Proving a graph is planar/nonplanar

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Ragnarok7
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Graph
In summary, the conversation discusses a homework problem involving a complex graph and determining if it is planar or not. The equation e\leq 3v-6 and the chromatic number of 4 suggest it may be planar, but there are also vertices of degree 5 or below and at least 5 vertices of degree 4 or above which could indicate a subgraph homeomorphic to K_{3,3} or K_5. However, after a few simplifications, the graph can be reduced to K_{3,3}, proving that it is non-coplanar. The speakers also discuss different methods for approaching the problem, with one using software to help visualize and manipulate the graph.
  • #1
Ragnarok7
50
0
I was given a rather complicated graph as a homework problem, and told to see if it is planar or not. It satisfies the equation \(\displaystyle e\leq 3v-6\) and has a chromatic number of 4 as well as vertices of degree 5 or below, so there's nothing to rule out planarity there. There are at least 5 vertices of degree 4 or above, and also at least 6 vertices of degree 3 or above, so perhaps it has a subgraph homeomorphic to \(\displaystyle K_{3,3}\) or \(\displaystyle K_5\) and so is nonplanar. But I've tried for a long time and I can't get any such subgraph. Is this a trial-and-error process, or is there a better way to go about it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Could you please post the graph?
 
  • #3
I believe this is reducible to \(\displaystyle K_5\), but I haven't double-checked it yet.

View attachment 1533
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 3.42.30 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-10-21 at 3.42.30 PM.png
    7.8 KB · Views: 90
  • #4
It's non-coplanar, but it's not isomorphic to either $K_{5}$ or $K_{3,3}$ directly. However, with a few simplifications, you can actually get it down to $K_{3,3}$. I've attached a picture to show you how:

View attachment 1534

So from the left graph, which is isomorphic to the one you were given, perform the following steps (all of which are simplifications; ergo, if the resulting graph is non-coplanar, then the original must have been non-coplanar.)

1. Remove edge BD.
2. Remove edge AD.
3. Consolidate edges HD and DF into one edge HF.
4. Consolidate edges EC and CG into one edge EG.

The result is the graph on the right, which is $K_{3,3}$. Therefore, your graph is non-coplanar.
 

Attachments

  • NonCoplanar Graph.png
    NonCoplanar Graph.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 75
  • #5
Thank you so much. It seems easier now that I've had a little more practice, but is it generally just a trial-and-error game?
 
  • #6
Ragnarok said:
Thank you so much. It seems easier now that I've had a little more practice, but is it generally just a trial-and-error game?

For me it was. There might be some nice mathematical trick to doing it in general. I used software: CaRMetal, a sort of open-source version of Geometer's SketchPad. It allows you to move vertices around easily while retaining the connectivity of the original graph.

What happened with me was this: after trying and trying (and failing, oddly enough) to get the graph to be coplanar, I tried to arranged it in a $K_{3,3}$ fashion. I knew $K_{5}$ wasn't going to be present, because there weren't enough vertices with degree 4 to make it isomorphic. So then it was a matter of grouping two sets of vertices to get both sides of $K_{3,3}$, and after some trial and error, I got it, as you can see. Without CaRMetal or some equivalent software, I'd have spent an enormous amount of time on this problem.
 
  • #7
Nice! I'll have to check out that software.
 

FAQ: Proving a graph is planar/nonplanar

1. How do you determine if a graph is planar or nonplanar?

To determine if a graph is planar or nonplanar, you can use the Kuratowski's theorem or the Euler's formula. Kuratowski's theorem states that a graph is nonplanar if it contains a subgraph that is a topological minor of either the complete graph K5 or the complete bipartite graph K3,3. Euler's formula states that for a connected planar graph with V vertices, E edges, and F faces, V - E + F = 2. If this formula holds true for a graph, then it is planar.

2. What is the difference between a planar and nonplanar graph?

A planar graph is a graph that can be drawn on a plane without any of its edges crossing. In other words, its edges do not intersect each other. On the other hand, a nonplanar graph is a graph that cannot be drawn on a plane without its edges crossing. Some examples of nonplanar graphs include the complete graph K5 and the complete bipartite graph K3,3.

3. Can a nonplanar graph be redrawn to make it planar?

No, a nonplanar graph cannot be redrawn to make it planar. This is because the nonplanarity of a graph is determined by its structure and not by its visual representation. Even if a nonplanar graph is redrawn, its edges will still cross and it will remain nonplanar.

4. How many edges can a planar graph have?

The maximum number of edges a planar graph can have is 3V - 6, where V is the number of vertices in the graph. This is known as the maximum edge formula for planar graphs. If a graph has more than 3V - 6 edges, then it is nonplanar.

5. Can a graph with crossing edges still be considered planar?

No, a graph with crossing edges cannot be considered planar. In a planar graph, none of its edges can cross each other. If a graph has crossing edges, then it is nonplanar. However, there are some exceptions in which crossing edges can still be considered planar, such as in the case of a Möbius strip or a Klein bottle.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
816
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top