Proving a sequence is convergent.

In summary: If the sequence {an} converges, then for any ε > 0, there is a number n1 such that |an2 - L2 | < ε when n >= n1. Given that the sequence {an} converges, can you use this to show that {an2} also converges?Yes, by using the fact that every convergent sequence is bounded from above.
  • #1
porroadventum
34
0
1. The problem is if an is convergent then prove or disprove by giving a counter example that an2 is also convergent.
2. Since an is convergent then for all ε>0 there exists n0[itex]\in[/itex] [itex]N[/itex] such that lan-Ll<ε for all n>=n0

So I then tried squaring (an-L) which gives an2 -2anL +L22
How do I manipulate this to show that an2 has a limit L too?

Or should I be looking for a counter example? I can't think of any!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
porroadventum said:
1. The problem is if an is convergent then prove or disprove by giving a counter example that an2 is also convergent.



2. Since an is convergent then for all ε>0 there exists n0[itex]\in[/itex] [itex]N[/itex] such that lan-Ll<ε for all n>=n0

So I then tried squaring (an-L) which gives an2 -2anL +L22
How do I manipulate this to show that an2 has a limit L too?

Or should I be looking for a counter example? I can't think of any!

If the sequence {an2} converges, then for any ε > 0, there is a number n1 such that |an2 - L2 | < ε when n >= n1. Given that the sequence {an} converges, can you use this to show that {an2} also converges?
 
  • #3
You can also start from:
[tex]|a^2_n-L^2|=|a_n+L|\cdot|a_n-L|[/tex]
 
  • #4
Mark44 said:
If the sequence {an2} converges, then for any ε > 0, there is a number n1 such that |an2 - L2 | < ε when n >= n1. Given that the sequence {an} converges, can you use this to show that {an2} also converges?
I'm quite sure Mark means, |an2 - L2 | < ε ...
 
  • #5
SammyS said:
I'm quite sure Mark means, |an2 - L2 | < ε ...
No, I meant L2, to distinguish it from L. It might turn out that L2 = L2, but I didn't want to make that assumption.
 
  • #6
[tex]
\forall \epsilon>0\ \exists N_1: n >N_1\ |a_n -L|< \epsilon[/tex]

but also

[tex]
\forall \epsilon>0\ \exists N_2: n >N_2\ |a_n -L|< \epsilon_1 = \frac{\epsilon}{M+L}[/tex]

Remember that every convergent sequence is bounded from above, say in this case by M.

Now we get:

[tex] |a_n^2 -L^2| = |a_n-L||a_n+L| <\epsilon_1 (M+L)<\epsilon [/tex] if [tex]n>max(N_1,N_2) [/tex]
 

FAQ: Proving a sequence is convergent.

What does it mean for a sequence to be convergent?

For a sequence to be convergent, it means that as the terms of the sequence continue, they get closer and closer to a single fixed value. In other words, the limit of the sequence exists and is a real number.

How can I prove that a sequence is convergent?

To prove that a sequence is convergent, you need to show that the terms of the sequence get closer and closer to a single fixed value. This can be done through various methods such as the epsilon-delta definition, the squeeze theorem, or the monotone convergence theorem.

What is the epsilon-delta definition of convergence?

The epsilon-delta definition of convergence is a mathematical method used to prove that a sequence is convergent. It states that for any positive value of epsilon, there exists a corresponding value of delta such that if the terms of the sequence are within delta of the limit, then they are also within epsilon of the limit.

Can a sequence have multiple limits?

No, a sequence can only have one limit. If a sequence has multiple limits, then it is not convergent.

What is the difference between a convergent and a divergent sequence?

A convergent sequence has a limit, meaning that its terms get closer and closer to a single fixed value. On the other hand, a divergent sequence has no limit, meaning that its terms do not approach a single fixed value, but instead either grow infinitely large or oscillate between multiple values.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
811
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top