Proving ##C## is constant in 4-dim ##R_{\mu\nu}=Cg_{\mu\nu}##

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of metric compatibility and the input of the Ricci tensor to the left side of Einstein's equation. The question is raised about whether the manifold is maximally symmetric if Ricci tensor has the form of Cg_{\mu\nu}. The conversation also mentions the constant Ricci scalar and its relation to the desired conclusion.
  • #1
crime9894
5
2
Homework Statement
Suppose for a certain 4-dimensional manifold, the Ricci tensor is given by ##R_{\mu}{\nu}=Cg_{\mu}{\nu}## .
Show C is constant (make necessary assumption)
Relevant Equations
Einstein's equation: ##R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2} Rg_{\mu\nu}=8\pi GT_{\mu\nu}##
This question wasn't particularly hard, so I assume metric compatibility and input Ricci tensor to the left side of Einstein's equation.
$$R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2} Rg_{\mu\nu}=Cg_{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2} (4C)g_{\mu\nu}=-Cg_{\mu\nu}$$
Then apply covariant derivative on both side:
$$\nabla^{\mu}(-Cg_{\mu\nu})=8\pi G\nabla^{\mu}T$$
From metric compatibility and conservation of energy-momentum tensor
$$\nabla_{\nu}C=0$$
Covariant derivative reduce to partial derivative when acted on scalar and thus conclude C is constant.

But now I thought of a different approach:
Maximally symmetric space has its Riemann tensor of the form:
$$R_{abcd}\propto g_{ac}g_{bd}-g_{ad}g_{bc}$$
Contracting both side once reduce it to Ricci tensor
$$R_{ab}\propto g_{ab}$$

So my question is: does it works the way around? Does ##R_{\mu\nu}## having the form ##Cg_{\mu\nu}## concludes the manifold is maximally symmetric?
Maximally symmetric space has constant Ricci scalar ##R## and contracting the Ricci tensor immediately yield desire conclusion.
But I'm not sure if such argument is valid at the first place
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is C? Also, the notation doesn't seem to be working in LaTeX.
 
  • #4

FAQ: Proving ##C## is constant in 4-dim ##R_{\mu\nu}=Cg_{\mu\nu}##

What does the equation ##R_{\mu\nu}=Cg_{\mu\nu}## represent?

The equation ##R_{\mu\nu}=Cg_{\mu\nu}## is known as the Einstein field equation, and it is a fundamental equation in general relativity. It represents the relationship between the curvature of spacetime (represented by the Ricci tensor, ##R_{\mu\nu}##) and the energy and matter content of the universe (represented by the stress-energy tensor, ##T_{\mu\nu}##).

What is the significance of proving that ##C## is constant in this equation?

If ##C## is proven to be constant in this equation, it means that the curvature of spacetime is directly proportional to the energy and matter content of the universe. This is a key concept in general relativity and has important implications for our understanding of gravity and the structure of the universe.

How is the constant ##C## determined in this equation?

The constant ##C## is determined by solving the Einstein field equation using the appropriate boundary conditions and physical assumptions. It can also be calculated using observations and measurements of the energy and matter content of the universe.

What evidence supports the idea that ##C## is constant in this equation?

There is strong evidence from observations and experiments that support the idea that ##C## is constant in this equation. For example, the predictions of the Einstein field equation have been confirmed by various observations, such as the bending of light around massive objects and the gravitational redshift of light.

Are there any alternative theories that do not involve a constant ##C## in this equation?

Yes, there are alternative theories of gravity that do not involve a constant ##C## in the Einstein field equation. These theories attempt to modify or extend general relativity in order to better explain certain phenomena, such as the accelerating expansion of the universe. However, these theories have not been as successful in making accurate predictions as general relativity with a constant ##C##.

Similar threads

Back
Top