Proving Convergence of a Sequence with a Geometric Condition

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sequence
In summary, the series $\sum c_n$ converges because it is a telescoping series with partial sums of the form $a_n - a_1$.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $0< \theta<1$ and a sequence $(a_n)$ for which it holds that $|a_{n+2}-a_{n+1}| \leq \theta |a_{n+1}-a_n|, n=1,2, \dots$.

Could you give me a hint how we could show that $(a_n)$ converges? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi mathmari,

Note that by hypothesis $\lvert a_{n+2} - a_{n+1}\rvert \le \theta^n\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$ for all $n \ge 1$. By the triangle inequality, for all $n > m$,

$$\lvert a_n - a_m\rvert \le \lvert a_{m+1} - a_m\rvert + \lvert a_{m+2} - a_{m+1}\rvert + \cdots + \lvert a_n - a_{n-1}\rvert$$ and the latter expression is no greater than
$$(\theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots + \theta^{n-2})\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$$ Note $$\theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots + \theta^{n-2} \le \theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots = \frac{\theta^{m-1}}{1 - \theta}$$as $0 < \theta < 1$. Hence $$\lvert a_n - a_m\rvert \le \frac{\theta^{m-1}}{1-\theta}\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$$ for all $n > m$. Take it from here.
 
  • #3
evinda said:
Let $0< \theta<1$ and a sequence $(a_n)$ for which it holds that $|a_{n+2}-a_{n+1}| \leq \theta |a_{n+1}-a_n|, n=1,2, \dots$.

Could you give me a hint how we could show that $(a_n)$ converges? :confused:
Let $c_n = a_{n+1} - a_n$. Use the ratio test to show that the series $\sum c_n$ converges. Then notice that $\sum c_n$ is a telescoping series with partial sums of the form $a_n - a_1$.

Edit. Sorry, I didn't see that Euge had got there first.
 
  • #4
Euge said:
Hi mathmari,

Note that by hypothesis $\lvert a_{n+2} - a_{n+1}\rvert \le \theta^n\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$ for all $n \ge 1$. By the triangle inequality, for all $n > m$,

$$\lvert a_n - a_m\rvert \le \lvert a_{m+1} - a_m\rvert + \lvert a_{m+2} - a_{m+1}\rvert + \cdots + \lvert a_n - a_{n-1}\rvert$$ and the latter expression is no greater than
$$(\theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots + \theta^{n-2})\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$$ Note $$\theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots + \theta^{n-2} \le \theta^{m-1} + \theta^{m} + \cdots = \frac{\theta^{m-1}}{1 - \theta}$$as $0 < \theta < 1$. Hence $$\lvert a_n - a_m\rvert \le \frac{\theta^{m-1}}{1-\theta}\lvert a_2 - a_1\rvert$$ for all $n > m$. Take it from here.

I see... thanks a lot! (Smile)
 

Related to Proving Convergence of a Sequence with a Geometric Condition

What does it mean for a sequence to converge?

A sequence converges if its terms get closer and closer to a single number as the sequence progresses. This number is called the limit of the sequence.

How do you show that a sequence converges?

To show that a sequence converges, you can use the definition of convergence which states that for any positive real number, there exists a term in the sequence after which all subsequent terms are within that distance from the limit.

What is the formal notation for showing convergence of a sequence?

The formal notation for showing convergence of a sequence is limn→∞an = L, where an is the n-th term of the sequence and L is the limit of the sequence.

Can a sequence have more than one limit?

No, a sequence can only have one limit. If a sequence has more than one limit, it is not considered to be convergent.

How is the convergence of a sequence related to the convergence of its subsequence?

If a sequence converges, then any subsequence of that sequence will also converge to the same limit. However, the converse is not always true and the convergence of a subsequence does not guarantee the convergence of the original sequence.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
852
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top