Proving Convergence with Cauchy Sequence Method

In summary, To show that a sequence is Cauchy, you must prove that |a_m - a_n| approaches 0 as m and n approach infinity independently. Using the given property, |a_{n+2} - a_n| can be expressed as the sum of |a_{n+2} - a_{n+1}| and |a_{n+1} - a_n|. This pattern continues for higher indices, allowing for the use of induction to show the general case. Therefore, (s_n) is a Cauchy sequence and converges.
  • #1
JamesF
14
0
Hello all. I'm having trouble on the following homework problem. It seems like it should be easy, but I'm just now sure how to approach it

Homework Statement



Let [tex](s_n)[/tex] be a sequence st [tex]|s_{n+1} - s_n | < 2^{-n}, \forall n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex]

show that [tex](s_n)[/tex] converges


The Attempt at a Solution



well I thought the easiest way to prove it would be to show it's a Cauchy sequence and therefore convergent, but perhaps that's the wrong approach. What's a good starting point for a problem like this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A good starting point is to show it's Cauchy. But you already knew that. Just do it. Cauchy means |s_n-s_m|<epsilon for n and m greater than N. The maximum difference between s_n and s_m involves summing a lot of large powers of 1/2. Use the triangle inequality.
 
  • #3
To show that a sequence is Cauchy you must show that [itex]|a_m- a_n|[/itex] goes to 0 as m and n go to infinity independently (in particular, you cannot assume that m= n+1).

But [itex]|a_{n+2}- a_n|\le |a_{n+2}- a{n+1}|+ |a{n+1}- a_n|[/itex], [itex]|a_{n+3}- a_n|\le |a_{n+3}- a_{n+2}|+ |a_{n+2}- a{n+1}|+ |a{n+1}- a_n|[/itex], etc.

You can use the given property on each of those and use induction to show the general case.
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
To show that a sequence is Cauchy you must show that [itex]|a_m- a_n|[/itex] goes to 0 as m and n go to infinity independently (in particular, you cannot assume that m= n+1).

But
[tex]|a_{n+2}- a_n|\le |a_{n+2}- a{n+1}|+ |a{n+1}- a_n|[/tex]
[tex]|a_{n+3}- a_n|\le |a_{n+3}- a_{n+2}|+ |a_{n+2}- a{n+1}|+ |a{n+1}- a_n|[/tex], etc.

You can use the given property on each of those and use induction to show the general case.
asaaaa
 

FAQ: Proving Convergence with Cauchy Sequence Method

What is the definition of a Cauchy sequence?

A Cauchy sequence is a sequence of numbers in which the terms become closer and closer together as the sequence progresses. In other words, for any given positive number, there exists a point in the sequence after which all subsequent terms are within that distance of each other.

How do you prove a sequence is Cauchy?

To prove a sequence is Cauchy, you must show that for any given positive number, there exists a point in the sequence after which all subsequent terms are within that distance of each other. This can be done by using the definition of a limit and proving that as the terms in the sequence get closer together, they eventually get within the given distance of each other.

What is the importance of proving a sequence is Cauchy?

Proving a sequence is Cauchy is important because it is a necessary condition for a sequence to be convergent. In other words, if a sequence is Cauchy, then it will converge to a limit. This is a fundamental concept in real analysis and is used in many mathematical proofs and applications.

What are some common techniques used to prove a sequence is Cauchy?

Some common techniques used to prove a sequence is Cauchy include the triangle inequality, the squeeze theorem, and the Cauchy criterion. These techniques involve manipulating the terms of the sequence and showing that they eventually get within a given distance of each other.

Can a sequence be both Cauchy and divergent?

No, a sequence cannot be both Cauchy and divergent. This is because a Cauchy sequence is defined as one in which the terms get closer and closer together as the sequence progresses, while a divergent sequence is one in which the terms do not have a limit and may become infinitely large or small. So, a sequence cannot be both convergent and divergent at the same time.

Back
Top