Proving Convergent Sequence of x^t to 0

In summary: Now we have##t^2(t + 6) - 15t##This is always positive if ##t > 15##. So we can conclude that if I take ##t > 15##, then##t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t > 0##This means that if I am looking at the limit as ##t \rightarrow \infty##, I can assume that ##t > 15## without changing the limit. Sometimes it is easier to solve a problem if you are allowed to make a few assumptions. The examples that I did in post 13 were so that I could make the problem a little easier.
  • #1
squenshl
479
4

Homework Statement


Show, from the definition of what it means for a function to converge to a limit, that the sequence ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## with ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## as ##t## goes to infinity.

Homework Equations


A sequence converges to ##x^0 \in X## if for any ##\epsilon > 0##, there is ##N \in \mathbb{N}## such that if ##t > N##, then ##d(x^t,x^0) < \epsilon##.

The Attempt at a Solution


To show that ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## we must, for any ##\epsilon > 0##, find a value ##N## such that if ##t > N##, then
$$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} - 0\right| = \left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon$$.
Now sure how to simplify ##x^t## to show that it is less than or equal to some much simpler expression in ##t## that can clearly be made less than any given ##\epsilon## by choosing ##n## large enough. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First, you could note that ##t^2 +7 > t^2##
 
  • #3
Since t is positive so is the fraction so you can drop the absolute value sign: [itex]\frac{2t+ 5}{t^2+ 7}< \epsilon[/itex] so [itex]2t+ 5< \epsilon(t^2+ 7)[/itex]. For what t is [itex]\epsilon t^2- 2t+ 7\epsilon- 5> 0[/itex]?
 
  • #4
squenshl said:

Homework Statement


Show, from the definition of what it means for a function to converge to a limit, that the sequence ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## with ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## as ##t## goes to infinity.

Homework Equations


A sequence converges to ##x^0 \in X## if for any ##\epsilon > 0##, there is ##N \in \mathbb{N}## such that if ##t > N##, then ##d(x^t,x^0) < \epsilon##.

The Attempt at a Solution


To show that ##x^t = \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}## converges to ##0## we must, for any ##\epsilon > 0##, find a value ##N## such that if ##t > N##, then
$$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} - 0\right| = \left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon$$.
Now sure how to simplify ##x^t## to show that it is less than or equal to some much simpler expression in ##t## that can clearly be made less than any given ##\epsilon## by choosing ##n## large enough. Please help.


If you do not want the smallest possible ##N## giving ##|x_t| < \epsilon## for ## t > N##, but are satisfied with some ##N = N(\epsilon)## that 'works', the problem is quite straightforward. Do you agree that for ##t \geq 1## the numerator is ##\leq 7t##? Do you agree that the denominator is ##> t^2##?
 
  • #5
Yup that's obvious so is it as easy as saying ##\frac{2t}{t^2} = \frac{2}{t} < \epsilon##.
 
  • #6
squenshl said:
Yup that's obvious so is it as easy as saying ##\frac{2t}{t^2} = \frac{2}{t} < \epsilon##.
Well, no: ##5 + 2 \neq 2##.
 
  • #7
Then I'm a little stuck. That ##t^2## has lost me. It's easy if it's just ##t##.
 
  • #8
squenshl said:
Then I'm a little stuck. That ##t^2## has lost me. It's easy if it's just ##t##.

##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}##. Note that the original numerator is ##7 t##, not ##2 t## as you wrote (but otherwise you did exactly the same simplification, using 2 instead of 2+5 = 7).
 
  • #9
Ok why is the numerator ##\leq 7t## for ##t > 0##??
 
  • #10
squenshl said:
Ok why is the numerator ##\leq 7t## for ##t > 0##??

It isn't, and I never claimed it was. Go back and read what I wrote, word-for-word.
 
  • #11
So is it as easy as saying ##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##??
 
Last edited:
  • #12
EDIT:
squenshl said:
So is it as easy as saying ##\frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##??

Only if you understand how you got there...
Solve the two inequalities in terms of ##t##:

##2t + 5 \leq 7t##

and

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

What relationship do you get for t in each one? What does ##\left\{x^t\right\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## dictate for t?

If ##A \leq B## and ##B < C##, then ##A < C##, yes?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
For the first one ##t \geq 1## and second one ##t > 0##. Where am I going with this??
 
  • #14
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??
 
  • #15
squenshl said:
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??
Perfect! That's very good. (except it's for ##t \geq 1##, look at post #13 again... And our sequence specifies valid values for t (also t > n, which is a natural number...). Is our inequality ever violated?)

And if we can show ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##, then we know that ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} < \epsilon##, right?

If ##n \in \mathbb{N}##, is ##(7 \times n) \in \mathbb{N}##, as well?
If ##t > n## does it hold that ##7 \times t > 7 \times n##?

(Note: I will use lowecase n because I don't want to make it confusing between the variable and the set)
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Sorry, you were wrong in #13 and I didn't catch it. It's a minor error, but

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

##t^2 \leq t^2+7##

## 0 \leq 7##

thus, the second inequality is always true.
 
  • #17
squenshl said:
So ##\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} \leq \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t}## for ##t > 0##??

One thing you're missing is that you don't need inequalities to hold for all ##t > 0##. If you are taking the limit ##t \rightarrow \infty## then you can look for inequalities that hold for large enough t. For example,

For ##t > 5## we have ##2t + 5 < 3t##
 
Last edited:
  • #18
So ##t\geq 1##.
krebs said:
Sorry, you were wrong in #13 and I didn't catch it. It's a minor error, but

##\frac{1}{t^2 + 7} \leq \frac{1}{t^2}##

##t^2 \leq t^2+7##

## 0 \leq 7##

thus, the second inequality is always true.
 
  • #19
Not sure what u mean here.
PeroK said:
One thing you're missing is that you don't need inequalities to hold for all ##t > 0##. If you are taking the limit ##t \rightarrow \infty## then you can look for inequalities that hold for large enough t. For example,

For ##t > 5## we have ##2t + 5 < 3t##
 
  • #20
I chose ##N > \frac{7}{\epsilon}## and we shall have if that ##t > N##, then $$\left|\frac{2t+5}{t^2+7}\right| < \epsilon.$$
 
  • #21
squenshl said:
Not sure what u mean here.

What you are trying to do with this problem is show what happens to your function as ##t \rightarrow \infty##. This means that when you are working with your function, you can assume that ##t## is greater than a given value. Any concerns about what happens if ##t = 0## or ##t = 1## are irrelevant to the limit. Let me given you an example.

Suppose I wanted to show that ##t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 \rightarrow \infty## as ##t \rightarrow \infty##

Well, I could try to solve cubic equations. But, instead, I would do something like this:

For ##t > 0, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t^3 - 15t = t(t^2 - 15)##

For ##t > 4, \ t(t^2 - 15) > t##

Hence, for ##t > 4, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t##

And, then it's very easy.
 
  • #22
Ok thanks!
PeroK said:
What you are trying to do with this problem is show what happens to your function as ##t \rightarrow \infty##. This means that when you are working with your function, you can assume that ##t## is greater than a given value. Any concerns about what happens if ##t = 0## or ##t = 1## are irrelevant to the limit. Let me given you an example.

Suppose I wanted to show that ##t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 \rightarrow \infty## as ##t \rightarrow \infty##

Well, I could try to solve cubic equations. But, instead, I would do something like this:

For ##t > 0, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t^3 - 15t = t(t^2 - 15)##

For ##t > 4, \ t(t^2 - 15) > t##

Hence, for ##t > 4, \ t^3 + 6t^2 - 15t + 173 > t##

And, then it's very easy.
 
  • #23
I think you might be caught up on the wrong things. We are working backwards along the following proof. Normally I wouldn't post an entire proof, but you've already solved the problem. I want to make sure you have a complete understanding of how that solution worked.

  1. There exists a natural number ##a##, such that ##x > a## satisfies the inequality: ##\frac{1}{x} < \epsilon## This is known/obviously true because ##\lim_{x \to ∞} \frac{1}{x} = 0 < \epsilon##
  2. ##\frac{7}{7x} < \epsilon## 1
  3. ##\{7, a\} \in ℕ## 1 and definition of ℕ
  4. ##7a \in ℕ## 3 and closure of ℕ for multiplication
  5. let ##n = 7a##
    let ##t = 7x##
  6. ##7x > 7a## 1
    ##t > n## 1,5 and 7x > 7a
  7. ##n \in ℕ## 4,5
  8. ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon## 2, 5
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2} < \epsilon##
    To recap: We have shown that there exists a number "n" in ℕ, and that if t > n, then ##\frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##. The rest if the proof is algebra to show that ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7}{t} < \epsilon##
  9. ##7 > 0## axiom
    ##t^2 + 7 > t^2##
    ##\frac{1}{t^2} > \frac{1}{t^2+7}##
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2} > \frac{7t}{t^2+7}##
  10. ##t > 1## This is a new constraint on our solution that t is greater than 1, but it doesn't matter because we can make n (and therefore t) arbitrarily large
    ##5t > 5##
    ##7t > 5+2t##
    ##\frac{7t}{t^2+7} > \frac{5+2t}{t^2+7}##
  11. ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7t}{t^2+7} < \frac{7t}{t^2} < \epsilon## 10, 9, 8

∴ ##\frac{5+2t}{t^2+7} < \epsilon## 11, and ##t > n## 6, and ##n \in ℕ## 7
 
Last edited:
  • #24
squenshl said:
So ##t\geq 1##.

You were the one that said ##\{x_t\}_{t=1}^{\infty}## in post # 1, so that means you want ##t = 1, 2, 3, \ldots##. In other words, you only care about ##t \geq 1##. But, in fact, to analyze what happens as ##t \to \infty## you could assume ##t > 1,000,000## if you wanted to---because eventually you will be taking ##t## larger than any number you can name or write down. That's what ##t \to \infty## means.

So, ##t \geq 1##, agreed? Now, for ##t \geq 1## we have ##5 \leq 5 t##, so ##2t + 5 \leq 2t + 5t = 7t##. That's all there is to it: just basic properties of numbers.

You also have ##t^2 + 7 > t^2##, so for ##t \geq 1## you have
[tex] 0 < \frac{2t+5}{t^2+7} < \frac{7t}{t^2} = \frac{7}{t} [/tex]
 
  • #25
If you don't like the given sequence, you can work the problem on a simple equivalent in a neighborhood of ##+\infty##.
 

FAQ: Proving Convergent Sequence of x^t to 0

What is a convergent sequence?

A convergent sequence is a sequence of numbers that gets closer and closer to a specific value as you continue to add more terms. In other words, the terms of the sequence approach a specific limit as the number of terms increases.

How can you prove that a sequence of x^t converges to 0?

In order to prove that a sequence of x^t converges to 0, you can use the definition of convergence. This involves showing that for any given small number, epsilon, there exists a corresponding term in the sequence that is less than epsilon. In other words, no matter how small of a number you choose, there will always be a term in the sequence that is closer to 0 than that number.

What is the limit of a convergent sequence?

The limit of a convergent sequence is the specific value that the terms of the sequence approach as the number of terms increases. In the case of x^t converging to 0, the limit would be 0.

Can a sequence converge to a value other than 0?

Yes, a sequence can converge to a value other than 0. In fact, a sequence can converge to any number, including positive and negative numbers as well as fractions and irrational numbers.

What properties or criteria must a sequence satisfy in order to be considered convergent?

In order for a sequence to be considered convergent, it must satisfy the definition of convergence. This means that for any given small number, epsilon, there exists a corresponding term in the sequence that is less than epsilon. Additionally, the terms of the sequence must approach a specific limit as the number of terms increases.

Similar threads

Back
Top