Proving Delta x^2 & Delta p^2 for Harmonic Oscillator

In summary, it is shown that for a general state of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator, neither \Delta x nor \Delta p is generally constant (independent of time). It is proven that both (\Delta x)^2 and (\Delta p)^2 are of the form (\Delta)^2 = A + B cos^2 \omega t, where omega is the frequency associated with the oscillator. The expectation values of x and x^2 are calculated, and it is found that they can be expressed in terms of the harmonic oscillator frequency using the raising and lowering operators.
  • #1
stunner5000pt
1,461
2

Homework Statement


Show taht neither [itex] \Delta x [/itex] nor [itex] \Delta p [/itex] is generally constant (independant of time) for a general state of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator. Prove that [itex] (\Delta x)^2 [/itex] and [itex] (\Delta p)^2 [/itex] are both of the form

[tex] (\Delta)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t [/tex]
where omega is the frequency associated with the oscillator.

2. The attempt at a solution

First of all I am not really sure wht the Delta means. Does it mean Delta x should have that form??

something like

[tex] (\Delta x)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t[/tex]
where A and B are some constants??

this is where i think is a logical beginning to th solution

since we are talking about the genferla case of the harmonic oscillator then the wavefunction must be written as a superposition of states??

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_{n} \psi_{n}(x) e^{-iE_{n}t/\hbar} [/tex]

so we can calculate the expectation value of x
[tex] \left<x(t)\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

and [tex] \left<(x(t))^2\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x^2 \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

we're going to get cross terms like

[tex] \left<x\right> = \int \psi_{m}^* x \psi_{n} dx [/tex]
[tex] \left<x^2\right> =\int c_{m}^* c_{n} x_{m,n} \exp\left(\frac{iE_{m,n} t}{\hbar}\right) [/tex]

now I am just wondering how to evalue these integrals

thanks for any help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
stunner5000pt said:
First of all I am not really sure wht the Delta means. Does it mean Delta x should have that form??

[tex]\Delta x = \sqrt{|<x>^2-<x^2>|}[/tex]

I put the absolute value bars in there because I forget the actual order of subtraction. :redface:

now I am just wondering how to evalue these integrals

Do you know what the wavefunctions look like? The spatial part of the Harmonic oscillator wavefunctions are Hermite polynomials, modulated by a Gaussian exponential function. Does that help?
 
  • #3
Tom Mattson said:
[tex]\Delta x = \sqrt{|<x>^2-<x^2>|}[/tex]

I put the absolute value bars in there because I forget the actual order of subtraction. :redface:



Do you know what the wavefunctions look like? The spatial part of the Harmonic oscillator wavefunctions are Hermite polynomials, modulated by a Gaussian exponential function. Does that help?

hmmm we never actually went into determining these in class so I am just wondering

its not in the textbook either

but i can acquire the formula for the hermite polynomials and get an answer from there i think
 
  • #4
stunner5000pt said:

Homework Statement


Show taht neither [itex] \Delta x [/itex] nor [itex] \Delta p [/itex] is generally constant (independant of time) for a general state of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator. Prove that [itex] (\Delta x)^2 [/itex] and [itex] (\Delta p)^2 [/itex] are both of the form

[tex] (\Delta)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t [/tex]
where omega is the frequency associated with the oscillator.

2. The attempt at a solution

First of all I am not really sure wht the Delta means. Does it mean Delta x should have that form??

something like

[tex] (\Delta x)^2 = A + B \cos^2 \omega t[/tex]
where A and B are some constants??

this is where i think is a logical beginning to th solution

since we are talking about the genferla case of the harmonic oscillator then the wavefunction must be written as a superposition of states??

[tex] \Psi(x,t) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} c_{n} \psi_{n}(x) e^{-iE_{n}t/\hbar} [/tex]

so we can calculate the expectation value of x
[tex] \left<x(t)\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

and [tex] \left<(x(t))^2\right> =\int_{\infty}^{\infty} \Psi(x,t)^* x^2 \Psi(x,t) dx [/tex]

we're going to get cross terms like

[tex] \left<x\right> = \int \psi_{m}^* x \psi_{n} dx [/tex]
[tex] \left<x^2\right> =\int c_{m}^* c_{n} x_{m,n} \exp\left(\frac{iE_{m,n} t}{\hbar}\right) [/tex]

now I am just wondering how to evalue these integrals

thanks for any help!


The question does not quite make sense to me. If you take a really general state, you won't get an expression lik ethey give but rather a sum of several cosine terms all with different values of angular frequency so I am confused by that question.

This siad, what you should do is NOT carry out the integrations but give them a name "A" or "B" and so on. All you need to know is that those are real parameters. You will find that some of those constants will multiply complex exponentials but the complex exponentials will come in pairs which wil be complex conjugate of each other. Using [itex] e^{i \theta} + e ^{-i \theta} = 2 cos (\theta) [/itex] you will end up with a bunch of cosine of [itex] \omega t [/itex]. But again, to get only one cos in your final answer, you woul dneed to consider a superposition of only two states of different energies, not more than that.
 
  • #5
There are analytic expressions for the matrix elements <m|x|n> and
<m|x^2|n> for the H.O.

In fact the elements <m|x|n> come up in the Fermi's golden rule treatment of infrared radiation causing transitions from state |m> to state |n>.

For anyone who's interested

[itex]<i|\hat{x}|j>=\delta_{j,i-1}\sqrt{(j+1)\hbar\
/2m\omega_0}+\delta_{j,i+1}\sqrt{j\hbar/2m\omega_0}$[/itex]
 
  • #6
christianjb said:
There are analytic expressions for the matrix elements <m|x|n> and
<m|x^2|n> for the H.O.

In fact the elements <m|x|n> come up in the Fermi's golden rule treatment of infrared radiation causing transitions from state |m> to state |n>.

For anyone who's interested

[itex]<i|\hat{x}|j>=\delta_{j,i-1}\sqrt{(j+1)\hbar\
/2m\omega_0}+\delta_{j,i+1}\sqrt{j\hbar/2m\omega_0}$[/itex]

Of course!:rolleyes: For some reason I thought this was about the infinite square well.

So indeed, using raising and lowering operators, One may find the expectation values of x and x^2 in an arbitrary state. The x will connect two states differing by one in the quantum number "n". The x^2 will connect two states of same n or differing by two. One can write the final result in terms of the harmonic oscillator omega.
Sorry for my mistake :frown:
 
  • #7
nrqed said:
Of course!:rolleyes: For some reason I thought this was about the infinite square well.

So indeed, using raising and lowering operators, One may find the expectation values of x and x^2 in an arbitrary state. The x will connect two states differing by one in the quantum number "n". The x^2 will connect two states of same n or differing by two. One can write the final result in terms of the harmonic oscillator omega.
Sorry for my mistake :frown:

There were two posts yesterday on QM wells. The other was asking for help on the infinite square well- hence the confusion. For some reason- I mixed them up in my mind too at first.
 
  • #8
nrqed said:
Of course!:rolleyes: For some reason I thought this was about the infinite square well.

So indeed, using raising and lowering operators, One may find the expectation values of x and x^2 in an arbitrary state. The x will connect two states differing by one in the quantum number "n". The x^2 will connect two states of same n or differing by two. One can write the final result in terms of the harmonic oscillator omega.
Sorry for my mistake :frown:

hmm i have seen the solution of the expectation value of x and x^2 using the ladder operators but we haven't covered that in class... and we won't in this course

but i will learn about this during the summer :smile:
 

FAQ: Proving Delta x^2 & Delta p^2 for Harmonic Oscillator

1. What is a harmonic oscillator?

A harmonic oscillator is a system that exhibits periodic motion in which the restoring force is directly proportional to the displacement from equilibrium. In other words, the force acting on the system always points towards the equilibrium point, causing the system to oscillate back and forth around this point.

2. Why is proving delta x^2 and delta p^2 important for a harmonic oscillator?

Proving delta x^2 and delta p^2 for a harmonic oscillator is important because it allows us to accurately describe the behavior of the system and make predictions about its future motion. These values represent the uncertainty in position and momentum of the oscillator, and understanding them is crucial in many areas of physics and engineering.

3. How do you prove delta x^2 and delta p^2 for a harmonic oscillator?

To prove delta x^2 and delta p^2 for a harmonic oscillator, we use the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum must be greater than or equal to a certain value, known as Planck's constant. By solving the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator, we can derive expressions for delta x^2 and delta p^2 in terms of the oscillator's energy and other parameters.

4. What are the implications of proving delta x^2 and delta p^2 for a harmonic oscillator?

The implications of proving delta x^2 and delta p^2 for a harmonic oscillator are significant in many fields of physics. It allows us to understand and describe the behavior of the oscillator with greater precision, and also has implications for quantum mechanics, as it demonstrates the inherent uncertainty in the position and momentum of a particle at the quantum level.

5. Are delta x^2 and delta p^2 the only uncertainties for a harmonic oscillator?

No, delta x^2 and delta p^2 are not the only uncertainties for a harmonic oscillator. There are other quantities that can have uncertainties, such as energy and time. However, delta x^2 and delta p^2 are the most commonly studied uncertainties for harmonic oscillators, as they are directly related to the position and momentum of the oscillator.

Back
Top