Proving divisibility by induction

In summary, the proof of n(n^2 +5) being divisible by 6 for n belonging to Z^+ can be done by first proving that P_1 is true, and then derive that if P_k is true then (k(K^2 +5))/6=r and if and only if (k(k^2 +5))=6r.
  • #1
leduc
2
0
Hello, I'm struggling with the question on induction.
I was wondering if you could help me?

Prove that n(n^2 +5) is divisible by 6 for n belonging to Z^+

P_1 is (1(1^2 + 5))/6=1 hence P_1 is true

If P_k is true then (k(K^2 +5))/6=r and if and only if (k(k^2 +5))=6r
then P_(k+1) is

(k+1)((K+1)^2 +5))=6r

We're looking for something with 6 as a factor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What have you done so far?
 
  • #3
leduc said:
If P_k is true then (k(K^2 +5))/6=r and if and only if (k(k^2 +5))=6r
Yes, that's true.
then P_(k+1) is
(k+1)((K+1)^2 +5))=6r
No, of course not. you just said 6r was equal to K(K^2+ 1). (K+1)^2= K^2+ 2k+ 1 so (K+1)((K+1)^2+ 5)= (K+1)(K^2+ 1+ 2k+ 5)= K(K^2+ 1)+ what?
 
  • #4
leduc said:
Hello, I'm struggling with the question on induction.
I was wondering if you could help me?

Prove that n(n^2 +5) is divisible by 6 for n belonging to Z^+

P_1 is (1(1^2 + 5))/6=1 hence P_1 is true

If P_k is true then (k(K^2 +5))/6=r and if and only if (k(k^2 +5))=6r
then P_(k+1) is

(k+1)((K+1)^2 +5))=6r
No- you want (k+1)((k+1)^2 +5))=6s for some s. You've already used r in P_k, you can't use it again to mean something different in P_(k+1). Also be careful about capital letters--if you define k as lowercase it should be lowercase throughout.

Also, "If P_k is true then (k(K^2 +5))/6=r and if and only if (k(k^2 +5))=6r" is true whether or not P_k is true--it's just algebra and doesn't help the induction. You want to start with P_k and then derive P_(k+1).
Start with assuming
(k(k^2 +5)) = 6r
and then SHOW that
(k+1)((k+1)^2 + 5) = 6s
for some integer s. One way to try it is to add something to both sides of your assumption--what is (k+1)((k+1)^2 + 5) - (k(k^2 +5))?
 

FAQ: Proving divisibility by induction

1. What is the concept of proving divisibility by induction?

The concept of proving divisibility by induction is a mathematical technique used to prove that a statement is true for all natural numbers. It involves breaking down the statement into smaller cases and proving its validity for each case, thus establishing a general proof for all natural numbers.

2. How do you use mathematical induction to prove divisibility?

To use mathematical induction to prove divisibility, you must first establish a base case where the statement is true for the smallest possible number. Then, you assume the statement is true for an arbitrary natural number, and use this assumption to prove that it is also true for the next natural number. This process is repeated until the statement is proven to be true for all natural numbers.

3. Can you give an example of proving divisibility by induction?

Yes, for example, to prove that 7 divides 6n+1 for all natural numbers n, we would first show that the statement is true for n=1 (base case). Then, assuming it is true for an arbitrary n, we can show that it is also true for n+1. This would involve substituting n+1 into the equation 6n+1 and showing that it is divisible by 7. By repeating this process, we can prove that the statement is true for all natural numbers.

4. Why is it important to prove divisibility by induction?

Proving divisibility by induction is important because it allows us to prove mathematical statements that hold true for all natural numbers. This can be particularly useful in number theory and other branches of mathematics, where divisibility plays a significant role.

5. Are there any limitations to proving divisibility by induction?

Yes, there are some limitations to this method. It can only be used for statements that involve natural numbers, and it may not work for more complex statements that involve irrational or negative numbers. Additionally, a valid base case must be established and the proof may become more complex for larger numbers.

Similar threads

Back
Top