Proving Equivalence of 0A=0, (-A)B=-AB, (-A)(-B)=AB

  • MHB
  • Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Equivalence
In summary: A)(-B)=AB, we can also prove 0A=0 and (-A)B=-AB. Therefore, 0A=0, (-A)B=-AB, and (-A)(-B)=AB are all equivalent to each other. In summary, we have proven that the statements 0A=0, (-A)B=-AB, and (-A)(-B)=AB are all equivalent to each other. This was done using the substitution method and the given axioms.
  • #1
solakis1
422
0
Given the following axioms:

For all A,B,C...we have:

1) A=A

2) A=B <=> B=A

3) A=B & B=C => A=C

4) A=B => A+C= B+C

5) A=B=> AC =BC ( NOTE :Instead of writing A.C or B.C e.t.c we write AB ,BC e.t.c)

6) A+B= B+A..........AB=BA

7) A+(B+C) = (A+B)+C............A(BC)=(AB)C

10) A+0=A...............1A=A

11) A+(-A)=0...............A=/=0 => (1/A)A=1

12).......(A+B)C= AC+BC.........

13) 1=/= 0
Then prove that: 0A=0, (-A)B=-AB, (-A)(-B) =AB are equivalent to each other
You may use as arule for substitution the following :

If S is a formula ,from S and t=s,or from S and s=t we mayderive T,provided that T is the result from S by replacing one or more occurances of t in S by s
The above was taken from the book : formal proofs in maths
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


First, let's define what we mean by "equivalent." In this context, it means that if we can prove one statement, we can derive the other two from it. So, we need to show that if we can prove 0A=0, then we can also prove (-A)B=-AB and (-A)(-B)=AB, and vice versa.

To prove 0A=0, we can use axiom 12, which states that (A+B)C=AC+BC. Let's let A=0 and B=0. This gives us (0+0)C=0C+0C. By axiom 10, we know that 0+0=0, so we can substitute that in and get 0C=0C. We can then use axiom 1 to say that C=C. Therefore, 0A=0 is proven.

Next, we can use the same approach to prove (-A)B=-AB. Let's let A=-A and B=0. This gives us (-A+0)C=(-A)C+0C. By axiom 11, we know that (-A)+0=0, so we can substitute that in and get 0C=(-A)C. We can then use axiom 1 to say that C=C. Therefore, (-A)B=-AB is proven.

Finally, we can use the same approach to prove (-A)(-B)=AB. Let's let A=-A and B=-B. This gives us (-A+-B)C=(-A)C+(-B)C. By axiom 11, we know that (-A)+(-B)=0, so we can substitute that in and get 0C=(-A)C+(-B)C. We can then use axiom 1 to say that C=C. Therefore, (-A)(-B)=AB is proven.

Now, to show that these three statements are equivalent, we just need to show that if we can prove one, we can derive the other two from it. So, if we can prove 0A=0, then we can also prove (-A)B=-AB and (-A)(-B)=AB using the same substitution method as above. Similarly, if we can prove (-A)B=-AB, we can also prove 0A=0 and (-A)(-B)=AB, and if
 

FAQ: Proving Equivalence of 0A=0, (-A)B=-AB, (-A)(-B)=AB

What is the meaning of "equivalence" in this context?

Equivalence refers to two mathematical expressions being equal to each other in all cases. In other words, they produce the same result no matter what values are substituted for the variables.

How can we prove that 0A=0?

In order to prove that 0A=0, we can use the property of multiplication by zero, which states that any number multiplied by zero is equal to zero. Therefore, when we multiply 0 by any number A, the result will always be 0, proving the equivalence of 0A and 0.

Is the statement (-A)B=-AB always true?

Yes, the statement (-A)B=-AB is always true. This is because of the commutative property of multiplication, which states that the order of multiplication does not affect the result. Therefore, whether we multiply (-A) by B or B by (-A), the result will be the same, proving the equivalence of the two expressions.

How can we prove that (-A)(-B)=AB?

To prove this statement, we can use the distributive property of multiplication, which states that the product of a number and the sum or difference of two other numbers is equal to the sum or difference of the products of the first number with each of the other numbers. In this case, we can expand (-A)(-B) as (-A)(-B) = (-A)(-1)(B) = (-1)(-1)(AB) = AB, proving the equivalence of the two expressions.

Can we use these equivalences in all mathematical equations?

Yes, these equivalences can be used in all mathematical equations. They are fundamental properties of multiplication and hold true for all numbers and variables. However, it is important to note that these equivalences may not hold true for other mathematical operations, such as division or addition.

Back
Top