Proving Equivalence of Euler-Macheroni Constant

In summary, the conversation discusses the problem of showing the equivalence between two definitions of the Euler gamma constant. The first definition is an integral while the second is a limit of a summation. The conversation also mentions the product expression for the Gamma function and how it can be used to show the equivalence between the two definitions of the Euler gamma constant. The problem is reduced to proving the equivalence between the infinite product and integral definitions of the Gamma function.
  • #1
BigKissLilKis
1
0
Hi Everyone,

I just registered for PF today because this problem was driving me nuts and I was hoping to get some help. It comes from pg. 5 of Peter Miller's "Applied Asymptotic Analysis" and goes like this:

The Euler gamma constant has one definition as
[tex]\gamma := \int_0^\infty e^{-t}\log\left(\frac{1}{t}\right)\,dt[/tex].

The problem is to then show that this integral is equivalent to the summation representation of [tex]\gamma[/tex]:
[tex]\gamma:= \lim_{n\to\infty} \left[\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} - \log n\right][/tex]

Assuming a lot of stuff, you can prove the first definition from the Laplace transform of log and the properties of the gamma function. However, this problem is much more difficult because they want you to show the equivalence between this integral and difference limit with what I think is very little background information.

I'm sure that this can be solved with elementary techniques, because it's in a textbook, but I am still stumped on how to do this. I've tried using elementary calculus, like just taking the integral and various series expansions, and even tried fitting the Euler-MacClaurin summation formula. I think there is just some simple trick, but I'm not sure.

Any insight would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Do you know about the product expression for the Gamma function?
[tex]\Gamma(z) = \frac{e^{-\gamma z}}{z} \prod_{k=1}^\infty \left[ \left(1 + \frac{z}{k}\right)^{-1} e^{z/k} \right][/tex]
Taking the log of this:
[tex]\log \Gamma(z) = -\gamma z - \log z + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left[ - \log\left(1 + \frac{z}{k}\right) + \frac{z}{k} \right][/tex]
For [itex]z = 1[/tex], this becomes
[tex]0 = \log \Gamma(1) = -\gamma + \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left[ \frac{1}{k} - \log(k + 1) + \log k \right][/tex]
so that
[tex]\gamma = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \left[ \frac{1}{k} - \log(k + 1) + \log k \right] = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left[ \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} - \log(n+1) \right] = \lim_{n \to \infty} \left[ \sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{k} - \log n \right][/tex]
(the last equality because [itex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \log(n+1) - \log n = 0[/itex]).

The problem is reduced to showing that the infinite product definition and integral definition of the Gamma function are equivalent. Then [itex]\gamma = -\Gamma'(1)[/itex]; the first definition of [itex]\gamma[/itex] you give is easily derived from the integral definition of the Gamma function.
 

FAQ: Proving Equivalence of Euler-Macheroni Constant

What is the Euler-Mascheroni Constant?

The Euler-Mascheroni Constant, denoted by the letter γ, is a mathematical constant that arises in various areas of mathematics, such as number theory, calculus, and probability. It is approximately equal to 0.5772156649 and is an important number in the study of the distribution of prime numbers.

Why is it important to prove the equivalence of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant?

Proving the equivalence of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant is important because it helps us understand the relationship between different areas of mathematics. It also helps us make connections between seemingly unrelated concepts and can lead to new discoveries and applications.

What does it mean for two numbers to be equivalent?

Two numbers are equivalent if they have the same numerical value. In the case of proving the equivalence of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant, it means showing that two different mathematical expressions that represent the constant are equal.

How is the equivalence of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant proven?

The equivalence of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant is proven using mathematical techniques such as calculus, complex analysis, and number theory. This involves manipulating and simplifying the different expressions for the constant until they are equal.

What are some real-world applications of the Euler-Mascheroni Constant?

The Euler-Mascheroni Constant has applications in various areas of mathematics and science, such as in the calculation of probabilities, the study of prime numbers, and in the analysis of algorithms. It also has applications in physics, particularly in the study of quantum mechanics and the behavior of particles in a magnetic field.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
206
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top