MHB Proving Equivalence of f(x) and g(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pappoelarry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
AI Thread Summary
To determine the equivalence of the functions f(x) and g(x), both must be simplified. The function f(x) simplifies to 3x² + 5x - 7, while g(x) simplifies to 3x² + 3x - 7. Since the coefficients of the x² terms are the same, but the coefficients of the x terms differ, f(x) and g(x) are not equivalent. Therefore, the two functions do not yield the same results. The conclusion is that f(x) and g(x) are not equivalent functions.
pappoelarry
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17) and g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11). If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The first function can be simplified by adding like terms: [math]f(x) = 3x^2 + 5x - 7[/math]. Do the same for g(x). Do they come out the same?

-Dan
 
pappoelarry said:
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17) and g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11). If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17)= (x^2+ 2x^2)+ (3x+ 2x)+(10- 17)
Can you finish that ?

g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11)= (4x^2- x^2)+ (4x- x)+ (4- 11)
Can you finish that?

Are they the same?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Proving Equivalence of f(x) and g(x)
Replies
5
Views
1K
MHB Equation 2: Prove that ##x^2+2x\sqrt x+3x+2\sqrt x+1=0##
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Is g(x) Equal to g(a) If Their Integrals Are Equivalent?
Replies
20
Views
2K
A Why the triangle inequality is greater than the 2 max{f(x),g(x)}
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB If f(3x) = f(3) + f(x) , then prove that : f(1) = f(3) =f(9) = f(27) = f(81) = 0
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB Find a,b,c,d for Max $a+b-c+d$
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB How to Simplify Rational Expressions with Variables
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB 33. Express sin 4x in terms of sin x and cos x
Replies
1
Views
4K
I Can the same argument be used for both radians and degrees in the sine function?
Replies
3
Views
2K
B Irrational inequalities √f(x)>g(x) and √f(x)>g(x)
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top