Proving Induction Problem: P(x) is an Integer for all Natural Numbers n

  • Thread starter Yoss
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Induction
In summary: I've never been quite comfortable with induction, I guess I just need more practice. But thanks for the help!In summary, the conversation discusses using mathematical induction to prove that for all natural numbers n, the expression P(x) = (n^3)/3 + (n^5)/5 + (7n)/15 will always be an integer. The approach involves setting up a set S and proving that 1 is a member of S, then assuming that for some k, k is a member of S and showing that k+1 is also a member of S. Various methods are suggested, including using Fermat's Little Theorem and the binomial theorem. Ultimately, it is shown that the expression is divisible by 15
  • #1
Yoss
27
0
Use mathematical induction to prove for all natural numbers [tex]n[/tex].

P(x) = [tex]\frac{n^3}{3} + \frac{n^5}{5} + \frac{7n}{15} [/tex] is an integer.

Say [tex] S = \{ n\in N:P(x)\} [/tex]

Then [tex] 1\in S. [/tex] (1/3 + 1/5 + 7/15 = 15/15)

So assume for some [tex] k\in N, k\in S [/tex]

So, obviously I have to show [tex] (k+1)\in S [/tex].

I'm not sure how to start. In order for it to be an integer, then 15 must divide
[tex] 5n^3 + 3n^5 + 7n [/tex].

I've worked through, by substituting (k + 1), tried distributing throughout, but I can't seem to get anywhere to factor out a multiple of 15. Can anyone give a suggestion of how to manipulate this so I can prove it? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Also, what I'm trying to do, is after I substitute in (k+1), I'm trying to form the original equation, since that's divisible by 15, and with that part, I'm trying to get the other part to be divisible by 15. You think this is the way to go?
 
  • #3
Ah nevermind I got it. I messed up the first time. Heh, distributing is tedious.
 
  • #4
Another way to do it is to look at congruences. Since x^n==x modulo n by Fermat's little theorem, we can easily show that 5n^3 + 3n^5 + 7n==0+3+7 ==0 Modulo 5, which is to say that 5 always divides this expression. And then can do the same thing for Modulo 3.
 
  • #5
robert Ihnot said:
Another way to do it is to look at congruences. Since x^n==x modulo n by Fermat's little theorem, we can easily show that 5n^3 + 3n^5 + 7n==0+3+7 ==0 Modulo 5, which is to say that 5 always divides this expression. And then can do the same thing for Modulo 3.

Heh, too bad I don't konw Fermat's "little theorem", although I have been meaning to study it. Thanks though.
 
  • #6
Yoss said:
Ah nevermind I got it. I messed up the first time. Heh, distributing is tedious.
(I thought you were saying that you had found the answer, that is why I thought it O.K. to suggest a second solution.)

Anyway, it can be done strictly by induction. First proving for 1 and assuming that 5k^3+3k^5+7K ==0 Modulo 15, or if you like, divisible by 15. If we use the binominal theorem, for the value of k+1, we have: 5(k^3+3k^2+3k+1) + 3(k^5 + 5k^4+10k^3+10k^2+5k+1) +7(k+1) to show divisible by 15. So we subtract out the original expression for k, which we assume equals 0. Then we get ride of all terms that are a multiple of 15, and all that is left is 5+3+7 = 15.

Fermat's Little Theorem: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatsLittleTheorem.html
 
Last edited:
  • #7
robert Ihnot said:
(I thought you were saying that you had found the answer, that is why I thought it O.K. to suggest a second solution.)

Anyway, it can be done strictly by induction. First proving for 1 and assuming that 5k^3+3k^5+7K ==0 Modulo 15, or if you like, divisible by 15. If we use the binominal theorem, for the value of k+1, we have: 5(k^3+3k^2+3k+1) + 3(k^5 + 5k^4+10k^3+10k^2+5k+1) +7(k+1) to show divisible by 15. So we subtract out the original expression for k, which we assume equals 0. Then we get ride of all terms that are a multiple of 15, and all that is left is 5+3+7 = 15.

Fermat's Little Theorem: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatsLittleTheorem.html

Nono, I did actually solve the problem. The first time I tried distributing all the polynomials I made an arithmetical error. But I tried it again and found the original equation divisible by 15 and then the remaining equation that came out of that was also divisible by 15.
 
  • #8
robert Ihnot said:
(I thought you were saying that you had found the answer, that is why I thought it O.K. to suggest a second solution.)

Anyway, it can be done strictly by induction. First proving for 1 and assuming that 5k^3+3k^5+7K ==0 Modulo 15, or if you like, divisible by 15. If we use the binominal theorem, for the value of k+1, we have: 5(k^3+3k^2+3k+1) + 3(k^5 + 5k^4+10k^3+10k^2+5k+1) +7(k+1) to show divisible by 15. So we subtract out the original expression for k, which we assume equals 0. Then we get ride of all terms that are a multiple of 15, and all that is left is 5+3+7 = 15.

Fermat's Little Theorem: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatsLittleTheorem.html


Yea, after reading your post, that's exactly what I did.
 

FAQ: Proving Induction Problem: P(x) is an Integer for all Natural Numbers n

What is the induction problem?

The induction problem is the philosophical question of whether or not it is possible to justify the process of making generalizations or predictions based on past observations. It is a fundamental problem in the philosophy of science and has been debated for centuries.

Why is the induction problem important?

The induction problem is important because it challenges the validity of scientific reasoning and the reliability of knowledge gained through induction. If we cannot justify our generalizations or predictions, then the entire scientific method may be called into question.

How does the induction problem relate to the scientific method?

The scientific method involves making observations, formulating hypotheses, and testing those hypotheses through experimentation. The induction problem challenges the validity of using past observations to make generalizations or predictions, which is a key aspect of the scientific method.

What are some proposed solutions to the induction problem?

There have been various proposed solutions to the induction problem, including the falsification principle, Bayesian inference, and the concept of "inference to the best explanation." However, none of these solutions have been universally accepted and the induction problem remains a subject of debate.

How does the induction problem apply to real-world situations?

The induction problem can have practical implications in fields such as medicine, economics, and climate science. For example, a medical treatment that has been proven effective in a small sample size may not necessarily work for the general population, highlighting the uncertainty of using induction in real-world situations.

Back
Top