MHB Proving lim sqrt(n) alpha^n is 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the limit of $\sqrt{n} \alpha^n$ approaches 0 for $0 < \alpha < 1$. The initial proof attempts to express $\alpha$ as $1/x$ with $x > 1$, but a participant points out that it should be $\alpha = 1/(1+x)$ where $x > 0$. The proof involves bounding $\sqrt{n} \alpha^n$ and showing it converges to 0 as $n$ approaches infinity. Overall, the approach is deemed correct with a minor adjustment needed in the expression for $\alpha$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise mathematical definitions in proofs.
OhMyMarkov
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I want to prove that $\lim \sqrt(n) \alpha ^n \rightarrow 0$ whenever $0 <\alpha < 1$. I got the following proof:

(1) Write $\alpha$ as $\alpha = 1/x$ where $x > 1$.
(2) $\sqrt{n} \alpha ^n = \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{n}}{(1+x)^n}\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{1+nx}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+x\sqrt{n}}\leq\frac{1}{x\sqrt{n}}\rightarrow 0$ as $n\rightarrow \infty$.

Is the proof I provided correct?

Thanks! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Proving $\lim \sqrt(n) \alpha ^n \rightarrow 0$

OhMyMarkov said:
Hello everyone!

I want to prove that $\lim \sqrt(n) \alpha ^n \rightarrow 0$ whenever $0 <\alpha < 1$. I got the following proof:

(1) Write $\alpha$ as $\alpha = 1/x$ where $x > 1$.
(2) $\sqrt{n} \alpha ^n = \displaystyle \frac{\sqrt{n}}{(1+x)^n}\leq\frac{\sqrt{n}}{1+nx}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+x\sqrt{n}}\leq\frac{1}{x\sqrt{n}}\rightarrow 0$ as $n\rightarrow \infty$.

Is the proof I provided correct?

Thanks! :)
The idea seems correct, but in line (1) you should have written $\alpha = 1/(1+x)$ where $x > 0$.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K