Proving limit of rational function

In summary, proving the limit of a rational function involves evaluating the function as the variable approaches a specific value. This can often be done by direct substitution, provided the function is defined at that point. If direct substitution yields an indeterminate form (like 0/0), techniques such as factoring, simplifying, or applying L'Hôpital's rule are used to find the limit. It is essential to consider the behavior of the function near the point of interest to accurately determine the limit.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1715475352922.png

The solution is,
1715475387370.png

However, I'm confused how ##0 < | x - 1|< 1## (Putting a bound on ##| x- 1|##) implies that ##1 < |x+1| < 3##. Does someone please know how?

My proof is,
##0 < | x - 1|< 1##
##|2| < | x - 1| + |2| < |2| + 1##
##2 < |x - 1| + |2| < 3##
Then take absolute values of all three sides of the equation,
##|2| < ||x - 1| + |2|| < |3|##
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2. Thus,
##|2| < |x - 1 + 2| < |3|##
##|2| < |x + 1| < |3|##
##2 < |x + 1| < 3##

However, the two on the LHS side is wrong.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex]\frac{x}{x+1}=1-\frac{1}{x+1}[/tex]
The problem is reduced to prove
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{1}{x+1} = \frac{1}{2}[/tex] or further
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} x = 1[/tex]
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
[tex]\frac{x}{x+1}=1-\frac{1}{x+1}[/tex]
The problem is reduced to prove
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{1}{x+1} = \frac{1}{2}[/tex] or further
[tex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 1} x = 1[/tex]
Thank you for your reply @anuttarasammyak! That is actually a very interesting idea to prove a rational function converges from first principles by decomposing the rational function by using partial fractions then using algebra of limits. I think you could also use first principles on ##x## and ##x + 1## by using the definition of limit, then maybe add the results? I.e prove that x goes to 1 as x goes to 1, and x + 1 goes to 2 as x goes to 1 respectively? However, how would we add these epsilon and delta proof to prove that our rational function converges to ##\frac{1}{2}##. Do you please know whether we just divide them, by each other or something like that?

However, do you please know how to solve using my method?

Thanks!
 
  • #4
We are interested in the neighborhood of ##x=1## so assuming ##0< |x-1|<1## is not a problem. The left inequality is always true, and the right one means
\begin{align*}
|x-1| < 1 \Longleftrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longleftrightarrow 1<x+1<3
\end{align*}
We get therefore
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2\cdot 1}=\dfrac{1}{2}
$$
But this isn't small enough. We have to narrow down ##|x-1|##. If ##\delta = 2\varepsilon ## and ##|x-1| < \delta ## then
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{\delta}{2|x+1|}=\dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2\cdot 1}=\varepsilon .
$$
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #5
fresh_42 said:
We are interested in the neighborhood of ##x=1## so assuming ##0< |x-1|<1## is not a problem. The left inequality is always true, and the right one means
\begin{align*}
|x-1| < 1 \Longleftrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longleftrightarrow 1<x+1<3
\end{align*}
We get therefore
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{1}{2\cdot 1}=\dfrac{1}{2}
$$
But this isn't small enough. We have to narrow down ##|x-1|##. If ##\delta = 2\varepsilon ## and ##|x-1| < \delta ## then
$$
\dfrac{|x-1|}{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{\delta}{2|x+1|}=\dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2|x+1|} < \dfrac{2\varepsilon }{2\cdot 1}=\varepsilon .
$$
Thank you for your reply @fresh_42!

That is very helpful. However, do you please know why my proof for the absolute value implication is wrong?

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #6
ChiralSuperfields said:
Thank you for your reply @fresh_42!

That is very helpful. However, do you please know why my proof for the absolute value implication is wrong?

Thanks!
What do you mean? The picture you uploaded was ok, except for the corrected factor ##2.##

Do you mean what you typed below your picture? I guess ...
ChiralSuperfields said:
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2.
... is the culprit, but I am notoriously bad with absolute values. I always have to scribble a lot to get it right.

My solution was ##0<|x-1|<1 \Longrightarrow 0<x<2 \Longrightarrow 1<x+1<3.## I don't understand why you made it so complicated.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #7
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, do you please know how to solve using my method?
[tex]d:= x-1[/tex]
[tex]|\frac{x}{1+x}-\frac{1}{2}|=\frac{1}{4}|\frac{d}{1+\frac{d}{2}}| < |d|[/tex]
for ##d## satisfying
[tex] -1 < d < 1[/tex]
[EDIT] I had confused the two and corrected. By contgrolling ##d## we can make it smaller than any given constant.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #8
anuttarasammyak said:
Say
[tex]\epsilon = x-1[/tex]
[tex]|\delta|=|\frac{x}{1+x}-\frac{1}{2}|=\frac{1}{4}|\frac{\epsilon}{1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}}| < |\epsilon|[/tex]
for ##\epsilon## satisfying
[tex] -1 < \epsilon < 1[/tex]
This is nothing but confusing.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes anuttarasammyak and member 731016
  • #9
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, I'm confused how ##0 < | x - 1|< 1## (Putting a bound on ##| x- 1|##) implies that ##1 < |x+1| < 3##. Does someone please know how?
Since ## |x-1| < 1, 0 < x < 2##. Therefore, ##1<x+1< 3##.
ChiralSuperfields said:
##|2| < ||x - 1| + |2|| < |3|##
This allows us to remove the absolute values around the x - 1 and 2. Thus,
##|2| < |x - 1 + 2| < |3|##
This is wrong. If ##x-1 < 0## then ##x-1+2 <2##. It is possible that ##|x-1+2| < 2##.
ChiralSuperfields said:
However, do you please know how to solve using my method?
I think it may be fundamentally flawed.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016
  • #10
It should be pointed out why the assumption ##|x-1| < 1## is made here: The purpose is to find a ##\delta## such that ##x/(x+1)## differs from 1/2 by at most ##\epsilon##. Restricting ##\delta < 1## is not a problem - if you could find a ##\delta \geq 1##, a ##\delta < 1## would clearly also suffice.

The issue if you do not restrict ##\delta## to some value smaller than 2, then ##x+1 = 0## becomes a possibility and ##|x/(x+1)|## is unbounded. Particularly larger than ##\epsilon## around ##x = -1##. So we choose to restrict ##\delta## to avoid this. Then, as mentioned above, we need to further restrict ##\delta## for values of ##\epsilon > 1/2##.

Note that we could have chosen ##\delta < k < 2## instead. This would imply
$$
\frac{|x-1|}{|x+1|} < \frac{k}{2-k}
$$
which is sufficient if ##\epsilon > k/(2(2-k))##. If not, then
$$
\frac{|x-1|}{|x+1|} < \frac{\delta}{2-k}
$$
and choosing ##\delta < (2-k)2\epsilon## works.
 
  • Love
Likes member 731016

FAQ: Proving limit of rational function

What is a rational function?

A rational function is a function that can be expressed as the quotient of two polynomials. In mathematical terms, it is of the form f(x) = P(x)/Q(x), where P(x) and Q(x) are polynomials, and Q(x) is not equal to zero.

How do you find the limit of a rational function as x approaches a specific value?

To find the limit of a rational function as x approaches a specific value, you can substitute the value of x into the function. If the result is a determinate form (i.e., not 0/0 or ∞/∞), that is the limit. If you encounter an indeterminate form, you may need to factor the numerator and denominator, cancel common factors, and then substitute again.

What should you do if direct substitution results in an indeterminate form?

If direct substitution results in an indeterminate form like 0/0, you should try to simplify the rational function. This can involve factoring both the numerator and denominator to cancel out common factors. After simplification, you can perform direct substitution again to find the limit.

Can limits of rational functions be evaluated at infinity?

Yes, limits of rational functions can be evaluated as x approaches infinity. To do this, you typically divide every term in the numerator and denominator by the highest power of x present in the denominator. After simplification, you can then evaluate the limit as x approaches infinity.

What happens to the limit if the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator?

If the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator, the limit as x approaches infinity will be infinity or negative infinity, depending on the leading coefficients of the polynomials. This indicates that the rational function will grow without bound as x becomes very large.

Similar threads

Back
Top