Proving ln(x^2+y^2) is a Potential Function

In summary, we have shown that ln(x^2+y^2) is not a potential function for the given vector field. The correct potential function is found to be -2sqrt(x^2+y^2) + C, which is obtained by taking the gradient and equating it to the vector field.
  • #1
bugatti79
796
4

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi [/itex] as

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi [/itex] as

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks

It doesn't because you have calculated it incorrectly. ##\nabla f = \langle f_x, f_y\rangle##. Is that what you did?
 
  • #3
LCKurtz said:
It doesn't because you have calculated it incorrectly. ##\nabla f = \langle f_x, f_y\rangle##. Is that what you did?

I just took the gradient

[itex] \displaystyle \nabla \phi =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{2x \vec i}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{2y \vec j}{\sqrt{ x^2+y^2}}[/itex]..?
 
  • #4
bugatti79 said:
I just took the gradient

[itex] \displaystyle \nabla \phi =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{2x \vec i}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{2y \vec j}{\sqrt{ x^2+y^2}}[/itex]..?

You were supposed to show that ##\phi(x,y) = \ln{(x^2+y^2)}## is a potential function for your vector field. ##\phi## is what you should be taking the gradient of.
 
  • #5
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi [/itex] as

[itex] \displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks

To find the potential function, set [tex] f_{x}=\frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/tex]Then take the integral w.r.t. x. which then rewrite f(x,y)=...+g(y). Then take the derivative of this w.r.t. y and equate it to the second one. Then f(x,y), the potential function satisfies the vector field.
 
  • #6
HACR said:
To find the potential function, set [tex] f_{x}=\frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/tex]Then take the integral w.r.t. x. which then rewrite f(x,y)=...+g(y). Then take the derivative of this w.r.t. y and equate it to the second one. Then f(x,y), the potential function satisfies the vector field.

Thanks, noted.



LCKurtz said:
You were supposed to show that ##\phi(x,y) = \ln{(x^2+y^2)}## is a potential function for your vector field. ##\phi## is what you should be taking the gradient of.

Then I calculate this, I don't know where the sqrt comes into it unless its a typo in the question?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y}{x^2+y^2} \vec j +\frac{2x}{x^2+y^2} \vec i[/itex]
 
  • #7
bugatti79 said:
Thanks, noted.

Then I calculate this, I don't know where the sqrt comes into it unless its a typo in the question?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y}{x^2+y^2} \vec j +\frac{2x}{x^2+y^2} \vec i[/itex]

This is what I get also.

It looks like the correct potential for that vector field is [itex]\displaystyle \phi(x,\ y)=-2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+C[/itex]
 
  • #8
SammyS said:
This is what I get also.

It looks like the correct potential for that vector field is [itex]\displaystyle \phi(x,\ y)=-2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+C[/itex]

V. good.

Thank you SammyS.
 

FAQ: Proving ln(x^2+y^2) is a Potential Function

What is a potential function?

A potential function is a mathematical function that represents the potential energy of a system. It is often used in physics and engineering to describe the behavior of physical systems.

Why is proving ln(x^2+y^2) a potential function important?

Proving ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function is important because it allows us to simplify and solve complex equations involving potential energy. It also helps us better understand the behavior of physical systems.

How do you prove that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function?

To prove that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function, we need to show that its partial derivatives with respect to x and y are equal. This can be done using the chain rule and properties of logarithmic functions.

What are some practical applications of proving ln(x^2+y^2) as a potential function?

Some examples of practical applications of proving ln(x^2+y^2) as a potential function include analyzing the motion of a particle in a gravitational field, calculating the electric potential in a system of charges, and solving problems in fluid mechanics.

Are there any limitations to using ln(x^2+y^2) as a potential function?

Yes, there are limitations to using ln(x^2+y^2) as a potential function. It may not be applicable to all physical systems and may not accurately represent the behavior of all systems. In addition, it may not be valid for all values of x and y, as it is undefined for negative values.

Back
Top