Proving Nested Intervals Converge to $\alpha$

  • MHB
  • Thread starter alexmahone
  • Start date
  • Tags
    intervals
In summary, I proved that if the left boundary of $I_{n}$ is formed by taking the first $n$ terms of the series expansion of $\alpha$, and the right boundary is $\frac{1}{2^{n}}$ bigger, then $\alpha\in I_{\infty}$.
  • #1
alexmahone
304
0
Let $\alpha$ be a real number between 0 and 1 written in binary: e.g.,

$\alpha=.1011001\ldots$ means $\alpha=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2^3}+\frac{1}{2^4}$$+\frac{1}{2^7}+\ldots$

Make a set of nested intervals by starting with $I_0=[0,\ 1]$, then defining recursively $I_n$ to be the (closed) left half of $I_{n-1}$ if the $n$-th place of $\alpha$ is 0, and the (closed) right half if the $n$-th place is 1.

Prove that the resulting sequence of nested intervals converges to $\alpha$, i.e., $\alpha$ is the unique number inside all the intervals.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How do I prove that $\alpha$ is always between the two endpoints?
 
  • #3
Hi there,

I'll call the $0.1011001\ldots$ bit the decimal expansion and the $\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2^{3}} + \ldots$ the series expansion. Let's define $\alpha_{k}$ to be the $k^{\text{th}}$ term in the decimal expansion of $\alpha$.

After some thought I think I can show that

$I_{n} = \left[ \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{\alpha_{k}}{2^{k}} , \frac{1}{2^{n}} + \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{\alpha_{k}}{2^{k}} \right].$

All this says is: the left boundary of $I_{n}$ is formed by taking the first $n$ terms of the series expansion of $\alpha$, and the right boundary is $\frac{1}{2^{n}}$ bigger!

I will leave you to prove this yourself, for which I recommend induction on $n$. I'd first convince myself by writing out the first few cases by hand (unless your really bright and can see it straight away, took me a while).

Once you have this, it shouldn't be too hard to show that

$\alpha \in I_{\infty} = \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\bigcap\limits_{k=0}^{n} I_{n}.$

Just showing that $\alpha\in I_{n}$ for arbitrary $n$ should do the trick.

On the other hand, what if $I_{\infty}$ contained some other element than $\alpha$? Could we get some contradiction?

---------- Post added at 08:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------

Actually, If you can prove that $I_{n}$ does indeed have the form I gave (which I haven't done yet, just going on my quick workings!), then since $\frac{1}{2^{n}}$ becomes zero and $\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{\alpha_{k}}{2^{k}}$ goes to $\alpha$ as $n$ goes to infinity, it should follow that $I_{\infty} = [\alpha,\alpha] = \alpha$.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Proving Nested Intervals Converge to $\alpha$

What is the definition of nested intervals?

Nested intervals refer to a sequence of intervals such that each interval contains the next one in the sequence. In other words, if we have a sequence of intervals [a1, b1], [a2, b2], [a3, b3], ..., then we have a1 ≤ a2 ≤ a3 ≤ ... ≤ b3 ≤ b2 ≤ b1.

What does it mean for nested intervals to converge to a number $\alpha$?

Convergence of nested intervals to a number $\alpha$ means that as we take the intersection of all the intervals in the sequence, the resulting interval will contain only the number $\alpha$. In other words, if the nested intervals [a1, b1], [a2, b2], [a3, b3], ..., converge to $\alpha$, then $\alpha$ will be the only number contained in the intersection of these intervals.

What is the significance of proving that nested intervals converge to $\alpha$?

Proving that nested intervals converge to $\alpha$ is significant because it allows us to make precise statements about the existence of certain numbers. This proof is a fundamental theorem in real analysis and it provides a way to rigorously define the concept of real numbers.

How do you prove that nested intervals converge to $\alpha$?

The proof involves using the completeness axiom of real numbers, which states that every non-empty set of real numbers that is bounded above has a least upper bound. We start by assuming that the nested intervals do not converge to $\alpha$, and then use the completeness axiom to show that this leads to a contradiction. This contradiction proves that the nested intervals must converge to $\alpha$.

Can nested intervals converge to a number other than $\alpha$?

No, the nested intervals can only converge to the number $\alpha$ that is contained in all the intervals in the sequence. This is because the definition of nested intervals and the completeness axiom of real numbers only allow for one number to be contained in the intersection of all the intervals.

Back
Top