"Proving Nilpotent Element in R has Unique Solution

  • Thread starter rookandpawn
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Element
In summary, the proof shows that if a ring R has no nonzero nilpotent elements, then the only solution to the equation x^2=0 is 0 itself. Conversely, if 0 is the unique solution to x^2=0, then R cannot have any nonzero nilpotent elements. The proof uses a contradiction argument, showing that if there is a nonzero nilpotent element a, then it must satisfy a^n=0 for some positive integer n, but this contradicts the fact that 0 is the unique solution to x^2=0. The proof also considers the cases where n is even and odd, and shows that in both cases, it leads to a contradiction.
  • #1
rookandpawn
16
0

Homework Statement



An element a of a ring is nilpotent if a^n = 0 for some positive integer n.
Prove that R has no nonzero nilpotent elements if and only if 0 is the unique
solution of the equation x^2 = 0

Homework Equations



I think nilpotent means that not only that a^n = 0 for some positive integer
n but that n is the least positive integer such that a^n = 0. ?


The Attempt at a Solution



Proving ->
if R has no nonzero nilpotent elements then there is no nonzero element a such that a^n = 0, and specifically in the case of n = 2, there is no such a.
Hence 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0


Proving <-(via contradiction)
if 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0 then
if R does have some nonzero nilpotent element a, then a^n = 0 for
some positive inetger n.

then either
n is even where a^n = a^(n/2) * a^(n/2) = 0
but since 0 is the unique solution of x^2 = 0, then
a^(n/2) = 0. Which contradicts the fact that n is the least
positive integer for which a^n = 0.

Or n is odd, where
a^n = 0 ---> (a^n)*(a) = 0 * (a) (multiplying both sides by a)
---> a^(n+1) = 0, now n+1 is an even integer,
which can then be factored into a square
so a^(n+1/2) * a^(n+1/2) = 0, but since 0 is the unique
solution of x^2 = 0, then a^(n+1/2) = 0, which contradicts the
fact that n is the least positive integer for which a^n = 0.

I would very much appreciate any evaluation of my attempt. Especially because I feel unsure of the n is odd case, since I just multiplied both sides by a so i could get the square.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What could be wrong with that? I think you are just lacking confidence. You may want to say explicitly that a^n=0 and a^m!=0 for m<n. As you say, make sure n is the least nilpotent power of a.
 

FAQ: "Proving Nilpotent Element in R has Unique Solution

What does it mean for an element in R to be nilpotent?

An element in R is considered nilpotent if it can be raised to some power and result in the zero element. In other words, there exists a positive integer n such that a^n = 0, where a is the nilpotent element and 0 is the zero element in R.

Why is it important to prove the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element in R?

Proving the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element in R ensures that there is only one possible way to solve for the nilpotent element. This is important because it guarantees that there is no ambiguity or multiple solutions, making the solution more reliable and easier to work with in mathematical calculations.

What is the process for proving the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element in R?

The process typically involves using the properties of nilpotent elements, such as their relation to the zero element and their powers, as well as other properties of the ring R. This may also involve using mathematical induction to show that the solution is unique for all possible values of n.

What are some common techniques used to prove the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element in R?

Some common techniques used include direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by mathematical induction. Additionally, properties of nilpotent elements such as their relation to the zero element and their powers can also be used to prove uniqueness.

Are there any special cases or exceptions to proving the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element in R?

In some cases, the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element may not hold true. This can occur in non-commutative rings or in certain types of rings with zero divisors. It is important to carefully consider the properties of the specific ring R when attempting to prove the uniqueness of a solution for a nilpotent element.

Back
Top