Proving no simplex has 2-fold symmetry

  • Thread starter zooxanthellae
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Symmetry
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of symmetry and the difficulty in determining axes of symmetry. The speaker requests clarification on the question and offers an example of how reflection symmetry can be present in most simplices. They suggest stating the question more clearly if there is a specific type of symmetry being referred to.
  • #1
zooxanthellae
157
1
Heck, I don't even know if this is true. Intuition seems to suggest that it is but I know of no way to prove it. In general I don't know of any way to rigorously determine axes of symmetry. And I am having trouble finding anything about this, so any links are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is there something unclear/asinine about my question? I fear it may be a little vague.
 
  • #3
It is a bit vague. If you allow reflections through arbitrary points, then most simplices have reflection symmetry. Ex: reflection through the midpoint of a 1-simplex. If you have something else in mind, then you should state it more clearly.
 

FAQ: Proving no simplex has 2-fold symmetry

What is a simplex?

A simplex is a geometric figure that is the simplest form of a polytope. It is a 3-dimensional shape that is made up of flat surfaces, called faces, that are all triangles. It can be thought of as the 3D version of a triangle.

What is 2-fold symmetry?

2-fold symmetry is a type of rotational symmetry where an object can be rotated 180 degrees and still look the same. This means that there is a point in the object that acts as a fixed point during the rotation.

Why is it important to prove that no simplex has 2-fold symmetry?

Proving that no simplex has 2-fold symmetry is important because it helps to understand the properties and limitations of simplexes. It also has implications in various fields such as mathematics, physics, and architecture.

How can one prove that no simplex has 2-fold symmetry?

To prove that no simplex has 2-fold symmetry, one can use mathematical proofs and geometric constructions. This involves showing that for any rotation of a simplex, at least one of the faces will not match up perfectly with the original position, thus breaking the 2-fold symmetry.

Are there any exceptions to this proof?

No, there are no exceptions to this proof. It is a mathematical fact that no simplex can have 2-fold symmetry. Even if a physical object appears to have 2-fold symmetry, it is due to limitations of our perception and not true symmetry within the object itself.

Back
Top