Proving Non-Conjugate Matrices with Characteristic and Minimal Polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Steph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Steph
11
0
I have a question where I must prove that none of the following matrices are conjugate:

1 1 0
0 1 1
0 0 1

1 1 0
0 1 0
0 0 1

1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1


I started by working out the characteristic polynomials since if these were different, the matrices couldn't be conjugate. But all three have the same characteristic polynomial [(1-t)^3], so that didn't help me.

I'm not sure what else I can do from here. I know that if A and B are conjugate, A = QBP where Q is the inverse of the matrix P. Also, matrices are conjugate if they represent the same linear transformation after a change of basis.

But I'm not sure how to apply these definitions to a specific example.

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
minimal polynomial, not characteristic polynomial.another way (equivalent) is to think of some other invariants under conjugation such as the number of eigenvectors.
 
I have written in my notes that conjugate matrices have the same characteristic polynomial -- am I correct if I say that conjugate matrices must have the same characteristic polynomial, but that matrices with the same characteristic polynomial are not necessarily conjugate? Is the point here that the minimal polynomials must also be the same for conjugate matrices, and that this is a more useful condition?


Many thanks for your help - I've used your suggestion and completed that and the rest of the question.
 
Of course conjugate matrices have the same char poly, but as you noted yourself that is not enough to differentiate between non-conjugate matrices. Minimal polys do differentiate between them.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top