Proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$

  • Thread starter Kindayr
  • Start date
In summary, the author is trying to show that if it had less than p elements, then the union of the equivalence classes would not 'fill' \mathbb Z, and so \equiv would not partition \mathbb Z, and so it would not be an equivalence relation. They say they have unsuccessfully tried to show this, but they say they have a much easier route.
  • #1
Kindayr
161
0

Homework Statement



Fix an integer [itex]p>1[/itex]. Prove that [itex]\mathbb Z_{p}[/itex] has exactly [itex]p[/itex] elements.

Homework Equations


Define the relation [itex]\equiv[/itex] on [itex]\mathbb Z[/itex] by setting [itex]a\equiv b[/itex] iff [itex]p|b-a[/itex]. (We have shown [itex]\equiv[/itex] to be an equivalence relation on [itex]\mathbb Z[/itex]). Let [itex]\mathbb Z_{p}=\{[a]:a\in\mathbb Z\}[/itex], where [itex][a]=\{b\in\mathbb Z:a\equiv b\}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution


I've unsuccessfully tried to show that if it had less than [itex]p[/itex] elements, then the union of the equivalence classes would not 'fill' [itex]\mathbb Z[/itex], and so [itex]\equiv[/itex] would not partition [itex]\mathbb Z[/itex], and so it would not be an equivalence relation: a contradiction. But I just can't get there, and I feel that that is much more of a difficult way to go about, and that there is a much easier route, any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Maybe you can try to prove something stronger, namely that

[tex]\mathbb{Z}_p=\{[0],[1],...,[p-1]\}[/tex]

So there are two things to prove here:
- If [itex]a\in \mathbb{Z}[/itex], then [a]= for [itex]0\leq b\leq p-1[/itex].
- If [itex]0\leq a,b\leq p-1[/itex] and if [a]=, then a=b

Do you agree that this is what you need to prove?
 
  • #3
Yes I agree those two points prove what is necessary. I'll have a go:

Let [itex]a\in\mathbb Z[/itex]. We know that [itex]a=np+r[/itex]. Note that [itex]0\leq r\leq p-1[/itex] (if i have to prove this I will). Then we have [itex]|r-a|=np\implies \frac{|r-a|}{p}=n\in\mathbb Z[/itex]. So we have [itex]p|r-a[/itex], so [itex]a\in[r][/itex], as required.

Let [itex]0\leq a,b\leq p-1[/itex] and suppose [itex][a]=[/itex] with [itex]a\neq b[/itex]. Then we have [itex]p|b-a\implies |b-a|=np[/itex]. Since [itex]a\neq b\implies0<|b-a|[/itex], it follows that [itex]0<np\implies n\neq 0[/itex]. This tells us that the distance between [itex]a[/itex] and [itex]b[/itex] is a non-zero integer multiple of [itex]p[/itex]. Note [itex]a,b[/itex] are interchangeable without loss of generality. We know [itex]0\leq a\leq p-1[/itex] and [itex]b=np+a[/itex], so it follows that [tex]0\leq a\leq p-1\implies np\leq a+np\leq np+p-1\implies p-1<np\leq b\leq (n+1)p-1,[/tex] with [itex]n>0[/itex]: a contradiction. (EDIT: Made stronger conclusion)

Does that work? Your hints gave me a lot of help, thank you for getting my mind off my previous proof.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
That seems to work fine! Good job! :smile:
 

FAQ: Proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$

What is the significance of proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$?

Proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is important because it allows us to demonstrate the properties and behavior of prime numbers in the context of modular arithmetic. This can help us better understand the nature of prime numbers and their relationships to other numbers.

How do you prove p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$?

To prove p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$, we use the definition of an Elt, which states that an Elt is a number that has no divisors other than 1 and itself. In the case of $\mathbb{Z}_p$, we can show that p is the only number that evenly divides p, making it an Elt.

Can p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ be proven for all prime numbers?

Yes, p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ can be proven for all prime numbers. This is because the definition of an Elt applies to all prime numbers, and the properties of modular arithmetic are consistent for all primes.

What are some applications of proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$?

Proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has applications in various fields, such as cryptography, number theory, and computer science. In cryptography, proving p Elts can help in creating secure encryption algorithms. In number theory, it can aid in studying the distribution and behavior of primes. And in computer science, it can be used in developing efficient algorithms and data structures.

Are there any challenges in proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$?

Yes, there can be challenges in proving p Elts in $\mathbb{Z}_p$. One challenge is that the proof may require advanced mathematical concepts and techniques, such as modular arithmetic and number theory. It may also involve lengthy and complex calculations. Additionally, there may be cases where the proof is not straightforward and requires creative thinking and problem-solving skills.

Back
Top