Proving Parallelism of Vectors in 3-Space: Help with a Proof

  • Thread starter uman
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the conversation discusses the definition of parallel vectors and how to prove that if \vec{V_1}-\vec{V^'_1} is parallel to \vec{V_2}-\vec{V^'_2}, then \vec{V_1} is parallel to \vec{V_2}. The conversation also includes a discussion on vector subtraction and the use of scalars to show parallelism.
  • #1
uman
352
1
If we have two nonzero vectors in 3-space [itex]\vec{V_1}=a_1\vec{i}+b_1\vec{j}+c_1\vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{V_2}=a_2\vec{i}+b_2\vec{j}+c_2\vec{k}[/itex], define [itex]\vec{V^'_1}=a^2_1\vec{i}+b^2_1\vec{j}+c^2_1\vec{k}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{V^'_2}=a^2_2\vec{i}+b^2_2\vec{j}+c^2_2\vec{k}[/itex]. How can we prove that if [itex]\vec{V_1}-\vec{V^'_1}[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\vec{V_2}-\vec{V^'_2}[/itex], then [itex]\vec{V_1}[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\vec{V_2}[/itex]?

Any ideas? I've been thinking about this for a while and it's bugging me because I think it should be true but I can't figure out how to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Also I don't know if this problem counts as "calculus" per se. It arised when doing a problem in Apostol's Calculus that I showed to be logically equivalent to the statement I posted above (at least I think so... let's hope I didn't make a mistake :-p) so I decided this forum was as good as any.
 
  • #3
Well to start, if you know that two vectors are parallel, what does that mean? In your book do you have something that says "Two vectors are parallel if..."

Secondly what exactly is the vector [itex]\vec{V_1}-\vec{V^'_1}[/itex]?
 
  • #4
Two vectors [itex]\vec{A}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{B}[/itex] are parallel if there is a scalar [itex]t[/itex] such that [itex]\vec{A}=t\vec{B}[/itex]. Also I wasn't aware there was more than one way to define subtraction of vectors but here is the one I am using: [itex]\vec{V_1} - \vec{V^'_1}=(a1-a^2_1)\vec{i} + (b1-b^2_1)\vec{j} + (c1-c^2_1)\vec{k}[/itex]
 
  • #5
Also I'm screwing up the latex somehow. There is supposed to be an arrow over [itex]V^'_1[/itex] and [itex]V^'_2[/itex]. I don't know how to fix it :-/
 
  • #6
Ok, so based on your definition, if [itex]\vec{V_1}-\vec{V^'_1}[/itex] is parallel to [itex]\vec{V_2}-\vec{V^'_2}[/itex] then there is some scalar [tex] t[/tex] such that [itex]\vec{V_1}-\vec{V^'_1} = t (\vec{V_2}-\vec{V^'_2}) [/itex] ...

Can you take it from here? Think about the components of the vectors, can you get them to say that there is some scalar such that [itex]\vec{V_1} = t\vec{V_2}[/itex]
 

FAQ: Proving Parallelism of Vectors in 3-Space: Help with a Proof

What is a proof in science?

A proof in science is a logical demonstration of a theory or hypothesis using evidence and reasoning.

How do I write a scientific proof?

To write a scientific proof, you must first state your hypothesis or theory, then provide evidence and reasoning to support it. Make sure to use clear and concise language and follow the scientific method.

What should be included in a proof?

A proof should include a statement of the hypothesis or theory, a description of the experimental or observational evidence, and a logical explanation of how the evidence supports the hypothesis or theory.

How do I know if my proof is valid?

A valid proof is one that follows the rules of logic and is supported by sound evidence. It should also be replicable by other scientists and withstand scrutiny and criticism.

Can a scientific proof ever be considered absolute?

No, a scientific proof can never be considered absolute because new evidence or discoveries may arise that challenge or disprove the original proof. Science is a constantly evolving field and theories are subject to change based on new information.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top