Proving Prime Numbers in Quadratic Imaginary Fields

In summary: K that is not principal. Suppose that d = p_1 p_2, where p_1 and p_2 are distinct prime numbers. Then the norm of \sqrt{-p_1} is p_1, and the norm of \sqrt{-p_2} is p_2. Since p_1 and p_2 are both prime, this means that \sqrt{-p_1} and \sqrt{-p_2} are both irreducible in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-d}]. Therefore, their product \sqrt{-p_1}\sqrt{-p_2} = \
  • #1
Kubik
1
0
Hi,

I need your help with the next two problems:

1) If \(\displaystyle p\) is a prime number such that \(\displaystyle p\equiv{3}\;mod\;4\), prove that \(\displaystyle \sqrt{-p}\) is prime in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-p}]\) and in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}[\displaystyle\frac{1+\sqrt[ ]{-p}}{2}]\) too.

2) 2) We have \(\displaystyle d > 1\) a square-free integer. Consider the quadratic imaginary field \(\displaystyle K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-d})\). Suppose that \(\displaystyle d\equiv{1} \mod 4\) or that it is divisible by two prime numbers. Prove in both cases that in the ring of integers of \(\displaystyle K\) there exists a prime ideal which is not principal, but its square is principal.

Note

We have seen in class that if the norm is a prime then the element is irreducible.

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hello,

I would be happy to help you with these problems. Here are my solutions:

1) To prove that \sqrt{-p} is prime in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-p}], we need to show that it is irreducible in this ring. Let's assume that \sqrt{-p} = \alpha \beta, where \alpha and \beta are elements in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-p}]. Then we have \sqrt{-p}^2 = \alpha \beta \alpha \beta = -p. This means that either \alpha or \beta must be a unit in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-p}], since their product equals a prime element. However, the only units in this ring are \pm 1, and neither of these can be equal to \sqrt{-p} since p is a prime number. Therefore, \sqrt{-p} is irreducible in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt[ ]{-p}], and hence prime.

To show that \sqrt{-p} is prime in \mathbb{Z}[\displaystyle\frac{1+\sqrt[ ]{-p}}{2}], we can use a similar argument. Assume that \sqrt{-p} = \alpha \beta, where \alpha and \beta are elements in \mathbb{Z}[\displaystyle\frac{1+\sqrt[ ]{-p}}{2}]. Then we have \sqrt{-p}^2 = \alpha \beta \alpha \beta = -p. This means that either \alpha or \beta must be a unit in \mathbb{Z}[\displaystyle\frac{1+\sqrt[ ]{-p}}{2}]. However, the units in this ring are of the form \pm \frac{a+b\sqrt{-p}}{2}, where a and b are integers. Since p is a prime number, this means that a and b must both be even, and therefore \pm \frac{a+b\sqrt{-p}}{2} cannot equal \sqrt{-p}. Therefore, \sqrt{-p} is irreducible in \mathbb{Z}[\displaystyle\frac{1+\sqrt[ ]{-p}}{2}], and hence prime.

2) In the case where d\equiv{1}\mod 4, we can use the fact that the
 

FAQ: Proving Prime Numbers in Quadratic Imaginary Fields

What are prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields?

Prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields are numbers that can only be divided by 1 and themselves, and are expressed in the form a + bi, where a and b are integers and i is the imaginary unit equal to the square root of -1.

How are prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields proven?

Prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields are proven using the same methods as prime numbers in the real number system, such as the Sieve of Eratosthenes and the Lucas-Lehmer test. However, additional techniques such as the Kronecker's theorem and the Artin's conjecture are also used specifically for quadratic imaginary fields.

What are the applications of proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields?

Proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields is important in number theory and cryptography. It also has applications in algebraic number theory, which is used in fields such as coding theory, signal processing, and error-correcting codes.

Are there any limitations to proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields?

Yes, there are limitations to proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields. One limitation is that the techniques used for prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields are not as well-developed as those used for prime numbers in the real number system. Additionally, there are still many open questions and conjectures in this field.

How does proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields differ from proving prime numbers in other fields?

Proving prime numbers in quadratic imaginary fields differs from other fields in that it involves the use of complex numbers and specialized techniques such as Kronecker's theorem. It also has applications in specific areas such as cryptography and coding theory, which may not be applicable to other fields.

Back
Top