Proving Prime p≥3 Satisfies pr ≡ 1, 5, 7 or 11 (mod 12)

  • Thread starter Amannequin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Prime
In summary, the conversation is about proving that if p is a prime number greater than 3, then p^r is congruent to 1, 5, 7, or 11 (mod 12). The suggested approach is to consider the possibilities for k and p mod 12, and then show that any other possibility for p^r results in a contradiction.
  • #1
Amannequin
4
0

Homework Statement



If p is a prime and p>3, show that pr[itex]\equiv[/itex]1,5,7 or 11 (mod12)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Do I go about this by knowing that any prime p greater than 3 is of the form 6n+1 or 6n+5? Any direction on how to go about this will be helpful. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Amannequin said:

Homework Statement



If p is a prime and p>3, show that pr[itex]\equiv[/itex]1,5,7 or 11 (mod12)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Do I go about this by knowing that any prime p greater than 3 is of the form 6n+1 or 6n+5? Any direction on how to go about this will be helpful. Thanks.

Show any other possibility doesn't work. For example, suppose ##p^r\equiv 2 (mod 12)##. What's wrong with that?
 
  • #3
If k is an odd number, list the possibilities for k mod 12.
Next if p is a prime > 3, list the possibilities for p mod 12.
Then what conclusion can you draw about ##p^r##?
 

FAQ: Proving Prime p≥3 Satisfies pr ≡ 1, 5, 7 or 11 (mod 12)

1. What does "mod" mean in this statement?

"Mod" stands for "modulo" and refers to the remainder after dividing a number by another number. In this case, we are looking at the remainder when dividing prime numbers by 12.

2. Why is p≥3 specified in the statement?

This is because the statement only holds true for prime numbers greater than or equal to 3. Smaller prime numbers do not satisfy the given equation.

3. How do you prove that this statement is true?

This statement can be proven using mathematical induction. First, we can show that it holds true for the base case p=3. Then, we can assume that it is true for p=k and use this assumption to prove that it is also true for p=k+1. By repeating this process, we can prove that it holds true for all prime numbers greater than or equal to 3.

4. What are the implications of this statement?

This statement has important implications in number theory, specifically in the study of prime numbers. It shows that all prime numbers greater than or equal to 3 can be expressed as 1, 5, 7, or 11 when divided by 12. This can also be used to prove certain theorems and make predictions about the behavior of prime numbers.

5. Can this statement be generalized to other moduli?

Yes, this statement can be generalized to other moduli. For example, we can prove that all prime numbers greater than or equal to 5 satisfy pr ≡ 1, 3, 7, or 9 (mod 20). However, the specific values of 1, 5, 7, and 11 in the original statement are specific to the modulus of 12.

Back
Top