Proving S(m*(2n-1)+n)=0 mod S(n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramsey2879
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving or disproving the equation S(m*(2n-1) + n) = 0 mod S(n) based on the recurrence relation S(n) = 6S(n-1) - S(n-2), with initial conditions S(0) = S(1) = 1. A proposed proof suggests extending the sequence backward to show that S(-1*(2n-1) + n) equals S(n), leading to a cyclical pattern in the sequence modulo S(n). The sequence is claimed to repeat, indicating that the original sequence modulo S(n) starts over after a certain point. The proof concludes with a question about its validity, inviting further discussion or confirmation. The exploration of this mathematical relationship highlights the complexity of modular arithmetic within the defined sequence.
ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
Given the following S(0) = S(1) = 1 and S(n) = 6S(n-1) - S(n-2)
Prove (or disprove for m,n integer) S(m*(2n-1) + n) = 0 mod S(n).
Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Ken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ramsey2879 said:
Given the following S(0) = S(1) = 1 and S(n) = 6S(n-1) - S(n-2)
Prove (or disprove for m,n integer) S(m*(2n-1) + n) = 0 mod S(n).
Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks, Ken
I am not sure but I believe I have a proof: If you extend the sequence backward S(-1) = S(2), S(-2) = S(3) and in general S(1-a)= S(a). Therefor, we have S(-1*(2n-1)+n) = S(-n+1) = S(n) and the sequence Mod S(n) from S(1-n) to S(n) is {0,a,b,...1,1,...b,a,0}. Now S(n+1) = 6*0-a =-a so the next 2n-1 terms are {-a,-b,...-1,-1,...-b,-a,0. Then the original sequence Mod S(n) starts over since 6*0 -(-a) = a. QED??
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
935