Proving Set Inclusion: A \subseteq A \cup B

  • Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sets
In summary, the conversation discusses proving that for sets A and B, A intersect B is a subset of A, and A is a subset of A union B. The conversation also touches on using the definition of subset and the concept of elements belonging to sets. The final proof involves showing that if x is in A intersect B, then x is also in A, and if x is in A or B, then x is also in A. This leads to the conclusion that A intersect B is a subset of A, and A is a subset of A union B.
  • #1
flyingpig
2,579
1

Homework Statement




For the sets A and B, prove that

[tex]A \cap B \subseteq A \subseteq A \cup B[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



I am guessing I should look at only two of them first?

[tex]A \subseteq A \cup B[/tex]

What conditions do I need?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Definition of C ⊆ D ?

Let x ∊ A⋂B, then ...
 
  • #3
let x be in A intersect B..what does that mean...
 
  • #4
C is a subset of D

if x is in the intersection of A and B, then x belongs to both A and B
 
  • #5
so x is in A ... is x in the Union of A and B
 
  • #6
flyingpig said:
C is a subset of D

if x is in the intersection of A and B, then x belongs to both A and B

∴ x belongs to A .
 
  • #7
SammyS said:
∴ x belongs to A .

Ohhhh

so for

[tex]A \subseteq A \cup B[/tex]

Same argument? i.e.

[tex] A \cup B[/tex] for some element x, belongs to A or B and hence A also belongs to A? DOes the "or" say whether it can have elements in A or not? Is it a hasty conclusion?
 
  • #8
yeah your elements could be in either A or B, it helps to draw a picture
 
  • #9
If x is in A, then x is in (A or B).
 
  • #10
I want to do this elegantly

So

[tex]x \in A \cap B \iff x \in A [/tex] and [tex] x \in B[/tex]

[tex]\therefore x \in A[/tex]

So [tex]A \cap B \subseteq A[/tex]

[tex]x \in A \cup B \iff x \in A[/tex] or [tex]x \in B[/tex]

So [tex]A \subseteq A \cup B[/tex]

q.e.d
 
  • #11
I just want to ask, I don't need to show that [tex]A \cap B \subseteq A \cup B[/tex] right? Because this just follows from subset properties? Does this make a good proof?
 

FAQ: Proving Set Inclusion: A \subseteq A \cup B

What is a set?

A set is a collection of distinct objects, called elements, that are grouped together based on a common characteristic or property.

How do I prove that two sets are equal?

To prove that two sets are equal, you need to show that they have the same elements. This can be done by listing out the elements of both sets and comparing them, or by using set notation and proving that all elements in one set belong to the other set and vice versa.

Can I prove that a set is empty?

Yes, you can prove that a set is empty by showing that it has no elements. This can be done by listing out the elements of the set and showing that there are none, or by using set notation and proving that no elements belong to the set.

How do I prove that an element belongs to a set?

To prove that an element belongs to a set, you can either show that the element is explicitly listed as an element of the set or that it satisfies the defining property of the set. For example, if the set is defined as all even numbers, you can prove that 4 is an element of the set by showing that it is an even number.

What is the difference between a subset and a proper subset?

A subset is a set that contains all the elements of another set. A proper subset is a subset that contains some, but not all, of the elements of another set. In other words, a proper subset is a subset that is not equal to the original set.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top