Proving $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$ with 3 Real Numbers

In summary, the statement $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$ can be proven using the contradiction method, using any three real numbers, or by applying the fundamental theorem of algebra or a geometric approach. This statement is directly related to the concept of radicals in mathematics.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Let $a,\,b$ and $c$ be three distinct real numbers.

Prove that $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My solution:

Let's write the inequality as:

\(\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}\ne\sqrt[3]{a-c}\)

Cube both sides:

\(\displaystyle a-b+3\sqrt[3]{(a-b)^2}\sqrt[3]{b-c}+3\sqrt[3]{a-b}\sqrt[3]{(b-c)^2}+b-c\ne a-c\)

Combine like terms and then divide through by 3:

\(\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{(a-b)^2}\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{a-b}\sqrt[3]{(b-c)^2}\ne0\)

Divide through by \(\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{a-b}\sqrt[3]{b-c}\ne0\) (recall the 3 variables are distinct)

\(\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}\ne0\)

Rearrange:

\(\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{a-b}\ne\sqrt[3]{c-b}\)

Cube:

\(\displaystyle a-b\ne c-b\)

Add through by $b$:

\(\displaystyle a\ne c\)

This is true, hence the original inequality is true. :)
 
  • #3
anemone said:
Let $a,\,b$ and $c$ be three distinct real numbers.

Prove that $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$.

using if $x+y+z=0$ => $x^3+y^3+z^3= 3xyz$
we get
$\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}= 0$
=> $(a-b)+ (b-c)+(c-a) = \sqrt[3]{(a-b)(b-c)(c-a)}$
or $\sqrt[3]{(a-b)(b-c)(c-a)} = 0$
or $(a-b)(b-c)(c-a) = 0$ => $a\,b\,c$ cannot be distinct
as they are distinct given expression cannot be zero
 

FAQ: Proving $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$ with 3 Real Numbers

How do I prove that $\sqrt[3]{a-b}+\sqrt[3]{b-c}+\sqrt[3]{c-a}\ne 0$ with 3 real numbers?

To prove this statement, you can use the contradiction method. Assume that the expression is equal to 0 and then manipulate the equation to show that it leads to a contradiction. This will prove that the expression is not equal to 0 and therefore, the statement is true.

Can I use any three real numbers to prove this statement?

Yes, you can use any three real numbers to prove this statement. The proof will still hold regardless of the specific numbers chosen.

Is there a specific mathematical concept or theorem that can be used to prove this statement?

Yes, the proof relies on the fundamental theorem of algebra which states that the degree of a polynomial with complex coefficients is equal to the number of its complex roots (counting multiplicity). In this case, the expression can be rewritten as a polynomial in terms of the cube root of the three real numbers, and the theorem can be applied to prove that the expression is not equal to 0.

Can I prove this statement using a geometric approach?

Yes, this statement can also be proved using a geometric approach. By representing the three real numbers as the coordinates of points in a three-dimensional coordinate system, the expression can be interpreted as the sum of the distances between these points. Using geometric properties, it can be shown that the sum of distances can never be equal to 0, proving the statement.

How does this statement relate to the concept of radicals in mathematics?

This statement is directly related to the concept of radicals in mathematics. The expression involves the cube root of the three real numbers, which is a type of radical. By proving that the expression is not equal to 0, it shows that the cube root of any real number is non-zero, which is an important property of radicals.

Similar threads

Back
Top