Proving $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$: Is It Possible?

  • MHB
  • Thread starter evinda
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation is about proving the inequality $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$. The speaker suggests using the fact that $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq \sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{\rho}{i} (nq-1)^i$, but the listener points out that it does not hold for $n=1$. The listener also has three questions about the inequality, including clarifying the variables and their constraints.
  • #1
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
3,836
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to show that $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$.

I thought to use the fact that $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq \sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{\rho}{i} (nq-1)^i$.

I tried to prove this but for $n=1$ it doesn't hold. Does it hold for greater $n$ ?

Or do we have to use something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

I want to show that $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$.

I have three questions about this inequality:

1. Did you mean $\binom{n}{i}$, or did you mean $\binom{\rho}{i}$, or did you mean $\binom{p}{i}?$ If you did mean $\binom{n}{i}$, are there any constraints on the size of $n$, particularly relative to $\rho ?$

2. On the RHS, did you mean $(nq)^p$ or $(nq)^{\rho}?$

3. Are there any constraints on the size of $q$?
 

FAQ: Proving $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$: Is It Possible?

What is the significance of proving $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$?

The inequality $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$ has applications in combinatorics, algebra, and number theory. It also has implications in the study of polynomials and their roots. Proving this inequality allows us to gain a better understanding of these mathematical concepts.

What are the conditions for which $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$ is true?

The inequality $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$ is true for all positive integers $n,q,p$ and all non-negative integers $\rho$. Additionally, if $n=1$ or $q=1$, the inequality holds regardless of the values of $p$ and $\rho$.

How can we prove $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$?

The proof of this inequality involves using mathematical induction and properties of binomial coefficients. The full proof is beyond the scope of this answer, but it can be found in various mathematics textbooks and online resources.

Are there any known counterexamples to $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$?

No, there are no known counterexamples to this inequality. It has been extensively studied and proven to hold in all cases where the conditions mentioned in question 2 are satisfied.

What are the practical applications of $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$?

The inequality $\sum_{i=0}^{\rho} \binom{n}{i} (q-1)^i \leq (n q)^p$ has practical applications in fields such as computer science, statistics, and engineering. It can be used to analyze and optimize algorithms, estimate probabilities, and model systems with discrete components.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
446
Replies
2
Views
982
Back
Top