Proving $\sum_{k=1}^{n}e^{ik\theta}$ Formula

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Sum
In summary, the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ can be proven using mathematical induction or complex numbers. It has many applications in mathematics and physics, and can be extended to other series through the generalized geometric series formula. However, it is only valid for certain values of $k$ and $\theta$ and is closely related to other mathematical concepts such as Euler's formula and trigonometric identities and series.
  • #1
Dustinsfl
2,281
5
Prove the formula
$$
\sum_{k=1}^{n}e^{ik\theta} = \frac{e^{i\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}}{2i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}
$$

I have a hint that says consider the expression $e^{i\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}$.
How can I get the second exponential in the numerator to have that expression?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
dwsmith said:
Prove the formula
$$
\sum_{k=1}^{n}e^{ik\theta} = \frac{e^{i\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}}{2i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}
$$

I have a hint that says consider the expression $e^{i\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\left(n-\frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}$.
How can I get the second exponential in the numerator to have that expression?

Hi dwsmith, :)

We shall start from,

\[\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta} = \frac{e^{i\theta}\left(1 - e^{in\theta}\right)}{1 - e^{i\theta}}\]

With reference to your thread, http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f13/basics-fourier-series-1717/ we have obtained,

\[e^{i\theta} - 1 = 2ie^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\]

Therefore,

\begin{eqnarray}

\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta} &=& \frac{e^{i\theta}\left(e^{in\theta}-1\right)}{2ie^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}\\

&=& \frac{e^{\frac{i\theta}{2}}\left(e^{in\theta}-1\right)}{2i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}\\

&=& \frac{e^{i\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}}{2i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}\\

\end{eqnarray}

\[\therefore \sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta}=\frac{e^{i\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)\theta}-e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}}{2i\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}\]

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Sudharaka said:
Hi dwsmith, :)

We shall start from,

\[\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta} = \frac{e^{i\theta}\left(1 - e^{in\theta}\right)}{1 - e^{i\theta}}\]

With reference to your thread, http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f13/basics-fourier-series-1717/ we have obtained,

Shouldn't the sum be
$$
\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta} = \frac{\left(1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}\right)}{1 - e^{i\theta}}
$$
where did the $e^{i\theta}$ in the front come from?
 
  • #4
dwsmith said:
Shouldn't the sum be
$$
\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta} = \frac{\left(1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}\right)}{1 - e^{i\theta}}
$$
where did the $e^{i\theta}$ in the front come from?

Note that \(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta}\) is a geometric series with common ratio \(e^{i\theta}\). So do you know the sum of the first \(n\) terms of a geometric series?
 
  • #5
Sudharaka said:
Note that \(\sum\limits_{k = 1}^ne^{ik\theta}\) is a geometric series with common ratio \(e^{i\theta}\). So do you know the sum of the first \(n\) terms of a geometric series?

$$
s_N = 1 + e^{i\theta} + e^{2i\theta} + \cdots + e^{in\theta}
$$
Multiple by $z$.
$$
e^{i\theta}s_N = e^{i\theta} + e^{2i\theta} + e^{3i\theta} + \cdots + e^{i(n+1)\theta}
$$
Next make the subtraction $s_N - e^{i\theta}s_N$.
So
$$
s_n(1 - e^{i\theta}) = 1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}\iff s_n = \frac{1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}}{1 - e^{i\theta}}.
$$
 
  • #6
dwsmith said:
$$
s_N = 1 + e^{i\theta} + e^{2i\theta} + \cdots + e^{in\theta}
$$
Multiple by $z$.
$$
e^{i\theta}s_N = e^{i\theta} + e^{2i\theta} + e^{3i\theta} + \cdots + e^{i(n+1)\theta}
$$
Next make the subtraction $s_N - e^{i\theta}s_N$.
So
$$
s_n(1 - e^{i\theta}) = 1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}\iff s_n = \frac{1 - e^{i(n+1)\theta}}{1 - e^{i\theta}}.
$$

Note that we are starting from \(k=1\). So the first term should be, \(e^{i\theta}\).
 

FAQ: Proving $\sum_{k=1}^{n}e^{ik\theta}$ Formula

How can you prove the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$?

The formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$, also known as the geometric series, can be proven using mathematical induction. This involves breaking down the problem into smaller cases and showing that the formula holds true for each case. Alternatively, the formula can also be proven using complex numbers and the geometric representation of $e^{ik\theta}$ on the complex plane.

What is the significance of the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$?

The formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ has many applications in mathematics and physics. It is used in Fourier analysis, which is essential in signal processing and solving differential equations. It is also used in probability and statistics, as well as in quantum mechanics and electromagnetic theory.

Can the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ be extended to other series?

Yes, the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ can be extended to other series with different coefficients. This is known as the generalized geometric series formula, which states that for any complex number $z$ and positive integer $n$, the sum of the series $z^k$ from $k=0$ to $k=n$ is equal to $\frac{z^{n+1}-1}{z-1}$.

Are there any limitations to using the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$?

The formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ is only valid for certain values of $k$ and $\theta$. Specifically, it is only valid when $k$ is a positive integer and $\theta$ is a real number. Additionally, the formula may not hold true for infinite series or series with complex coefficients.

How is the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ related to other mathematical concepts?

The formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ is closely related to other mathematical concepts, such as the Euler's formula, which states that $e^{i\theta} = \cos(\theta) + i\sin(\theta)$. This can be seen by setting $k=1$ in the formula for summing $e^{ik\theta}$ and using the geometric representation of $e^{i\theta}$ on the complex plane. The formula is also related to other trigonometric identities and series, such as the Taylor series for $e^x$ and the Maclaurin series for $\cos(\theta)$ and $\sin(\theta)$.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top