Proving \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k(k+1)} = 1 Using Deduction

  • MHB
  • Thread starter ChelseaL
  • Start date
In summary, the author shows that if you sum over the number of terms in a series, the series converges to 1.
  • #1
ChelseaL
22
0
Use the fact that [tex]\frac{1}{k}[/tex] - [tex]\frac{1}{k+1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{k(k+1)}[/tex] to show that


Deduce that

[tex]\infty[/tex]
sigma ([tex]\frac{1}{k(k+1)}[/tex]) = 1
r=1

How do I solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Take a look at what I posted for the $n$th sum of this same series, and see if you can't change in over to an infinite sum...
 
  • #3
ChelseaL said:
Use the fact that [tex]\frac{1}{k}[/tex] - [tex]\frac{1}{k+1}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{k(k+1)}[/tex] to show that


Deduce that

[tex]\infty[/tex]
sigma ([tex]\frac{1}{k(k+1)}[/tex]) = 1
r=1

How do I solve this?
Are you summing over r or over k? I'll assume k.

\(\displaystyle \sum _{k = 1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k(k + 1)} = \sum _{k = 1} ^{\infty} \left ( \frac{1}{k} - \frac{1}{k + 1} \right )\). You can break this up into two summations and evaluate them with the known rule, or you could note that this is a telescopic series and most of the terms will cancel out.

-Dan
 
  • #4
So basically they are equal?
 
  • #5
I would write:

\(\displaystyle S_{\infty}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k+1}\right)=1+\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)\)
 
  • #6
MarkFL said:
\(\displaystyle S_{\infty}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k+1}\right)=1+\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)\)
I am not sure I am familiar with the rule that allows writing \(\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k+1}\right)\).
 
  • #7
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I am not sure I am familiar with the rule that allows writing \(\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k+1}\right)\).

Yes, that was a bad post. The OP stated an unfamiliarity with limits, so I "winged it." What I would actually do is:

\(\displaystyle S_{\infty}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)\right)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)=1\)
 
  • #8
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I am not sure I am familiar with the rule that allows writing \(\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k(k+1)}\right)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k}\right)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{k+1}\right)\).
Ah, convergence issues. (Swearing) One of my favorite topics (to ignore.)

Thanks for the catch.

-Dan
 

FAQ: Proving \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k(k+1)} = 1 Using Deduction

What is deduction?

Deduction is a logical process of reaching a conclusion based on a set of premises or propositions that are assumed to be true. It involves applying general principles or rules to specific cases in order to arrive at a specific conclusion.

How is deduction different from induction?

Deduction is a form of reasoning that moves from general principles to specific instances, whereas induction is a form of reasoning that moves from specific instances to general principles. In other words, deduction is a top-down approach, while induction is a bottom-up approach.

What are the steps of deduction?

The steps of deduction are as follows: 1) identify the general principle or rule, 2) identify the specific case or premise, 3) apply the general principle or rule to the specific case, and 4) reach a conclusion based on the application of the general principle or rule.

What is the role of evidence in deduction?

Evidence plays a crucial role in deduction as it provides the premises or propositions on which the general principles or rules can be applied. The more reliable and relevant the evidence, the more likely the conclusion reached through deduction will be valid.

Can deduction be used in scientific research?

Yes, deduction is commonly used in scientific research to test hypotheses and theories. Scientists use deductive reasoning to make predictions based on their theories and then test those predictions through experimentation or observation. If the results of the experiments or observations match the predicted outcome, it provides support for the theory. However, if the results do not match the prediction, it may require revising the theory or coming up with a new one.

Back
Top