Proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences

In summary, the conversation discusses the task of showing that the subset W, which consists of all sequences with only finitely many non-zero entries, is a subspace of the vector space V, which consists of all infinite real sequences. The main points of the conversation are that W needs to be checked for closure under addition and scalar multiplication, as well as for other properties of a subspace. Additionally, the maximum possible number of non-zero entries of the sum of two sequences in W is the sum of the maximum non-zero entries of each sequence.
  • #1
gtfitzpatrick
379
0

Homework Statement



let V be the vector space consisting of all infinite real sequences. Show that the subset W consisting of all such sequences with only finitely many non-0 entities is a subspace of V

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so i have to show 1.Closure under Addition,2. Closure under Scalar Multiplcation

let x=(x[tex]_{n}[/tex]),y=(y[tex]_{n}[/tex]) [tex]\in[/tex] W
x + y [tex]\in[/tex] W closed under addition and since W is a set of finite sequences [tex]\in[/tex] V as it consists of infinite sequences

[tex]\lambda[/tex] is a scalar and [tex]\lambda[/tex]x [tex]\in[/tex] W closed under scalar multiplication and since W is a set of finite sequences [tex]\in[/tex] V as it consists of infinite sequences

I think this proves it

...But if [tex]\lambda[/tex] is negative this proof doesn't work,is there something i am missing or have i provided the required proof?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


You want to check your definitions for V and W.
W is not closed under addition because the sequences in W are finite and those in V are infinite... you actually told us yourself that V consists of finite sequences.
What you need to check is that when you add two sequences with finitely many non-zero entries, you get something with finitely many non-zero entries.

So either look carefully at your proof, or at your definitions, because it looks like the proof doesn't belong to the exercise.
 
  • #3


whoops really sorry V consists of all infinite real sequences.

if W only consists of finitely many entries and V consists of infinite does it not follow that W has to be a sub space?
 
  • #4


Yes, it follows, but you still have to show it by checking the properties of a subspace.

For example: is W closed? I.e., if you take two infinite sequences with only finitely many non-zero entries, and you add them, do you get again a sequence with only finitely many non-zero entries?

What else do you have to show?
 
  • #5


Suppose u has n non-zero entries and v has m non zero entries. What is the maximum possible number of non-zero entries of u+ v?
 

FAQ: Proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences

What is a subspace?

A subspace is a subset of a vector space that satisfies all of the properties of a vector space. This means that it must be closed under addition and scalar multiplication, and it must contain the zero vector.

How do you prove that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences?

To prove that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences, you must show that it satisfies all of the properties of a vector space. This means that you must show that it is closed under addition, scalar multiplication, and contains the zero vector. Additionally, you must also show that it fulfills the closure property, which means that every sequence in the subspace must also be an infinite sequence.

Why is it important to prove that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences?

Proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences is important because it allows us to use the properties of vector spaces to analyze and manipulate these sequences. This can be particularly useful in fields such as linear algebra and functional analysis.

What are some examples of subspaces of all the infinite sequences?

Some examples of subspaces of all the infinite sequences include the set of all sequences with finite support, the set of all convergent sequences, and the set of all constant sequences.

Are there any exceptions to the rules for proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences?

Yes, there are some exceptions to the rules for proving that something is a subspace of all the infinite sequences. For example, if you are working with complex numbers or functions, the closure property may not hold. In these cases, you must use different methods to prove that something is a subspace.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
932
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
935
Back
Top