Proving the conservation of momentum when two masses are not equal

In summary: This is obviously incorrect.The correct formula is:Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x VglassLHS has units of momentum; because it is momentum.RHS has units of velocity; because the mass units cancel out.In summary, the use of the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass is necessary in elastic collisions between steel and glass balls of different masses in order to account for the scaling factors of mass and velocity. This formula cannot be mathematically proved, but it is a necessary part of showing the conservation of momentum.
  • #1
Stan2309
2
0

Homework Statement



In this exercise we used steel and glass balls to calculate and prove the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions. I had to prove how momentum is conserved through displacements vectors and right triangles. All that stuff is easy and I got it. The last question is where I am stuck. The question states: When the mass of the 2marbles (glass and steel) are not the same, and they collide (the glass marble was initially at rest), why do you need to use the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass (in the brackets the mass of the glass marble is divided by the mass of the steel marble, but we are not given any variables and are just required to prove or derive this formula)?

Homework Equations


I attempted to derive this formula through P total initial= P total final and the conservation of kinetic energy. 1/2m1v1i^2(squared) + 1/2m2v2i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2


The Attempt at a Solution


when i expand the formulas and substitute them into each other, I just end up with the equations for 1D elastic collisions v1f=(m1-m2/m1+m2)v1i and respectively v2f=(2m1/m1+m2)v1i
I spent the whole night going through all 3 of my physics textbooks and many websites online but couldn't find the way to prove or derive that formula. My teacher said it was a hard question but I never thought it would be this difficult. Oh by the way this is Gr.12 Academic physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Stan2309 said:

Homework Statement



In this exercise we used steel and glass balls to calculate and prove the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions. I had to prove how momentum is conserved through displacements vectors and right triangles. All that stuff is easy and I got it. The last question is where I am stuck. The question states: When the mass of the 2marbles (glass and steel) are not the same, and they collide (the glass marble was initially at rest), why do you need to use the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass (in the brackets the mass of the glass marble is divided by the mass of the steel marble, but we are not given any variables and are just required to prove or derive this formula)?

Homework Equations


I attempted to derive this formula through P total initial= P total final and the conservation of kinetic energy. 1/2m1v1i^2(squared) + 1/2m2v2i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2


The Attempt at a Solution


when i expand the formulas and substitute them into each other, I just end up with the equations for 1D elastic collisions v1f=(m1-m2/m1+m2)v1i and respectively v2f=(2m1/m1+m2)v1i
I spent the whole night going through all 3 of my physics textbooks and many websites online but couldn't find the way to prove or derive that formula. My teacher said it was a hard question but I never thought it would be this difficult. Oh by the way this is Gr.12 Academic physics.

In this experiment you are measuring velocities [by referring to displacement in a fixed time]

You are then trying to show conservation of momentum.

The only measure you have is velocity, but momentum is the product of mass and velocity.

When you do the experiment with two equal steel balls, the mass of a steel ball is effectively just a scaling factor for the velocity - so you can do a diagram of velocity vectors - in arbitrary units - to show momentum is conserved.

When you use balls of different masses [steel and glass], to merely use the velocity of each ball is not suitable.
Since velocity is measured in arbitrary units - displacement / some time (perhaps the time taken to fall a set distance) - and mass is effectively a "scaling factor", we have to match those scaling factors. By using Mglass/ Msteel that is achieved.
or example; if the glass ball is 1/3rd the mass of the steel ball, it will be traveling 3-times a s fast for an equivalent momentum value.

Hope that all makes sense.

Peter
 
  • #3
yeah i get what we're doing and all, but my teacher want me to derive this formula. I'm suspecting it has something to do with the glass/steel ratio and the displacement vectors. Need mathematical proof D:
 
  • #4
Stan2309 said:
yeah i get what we're doing and all, but my teacher want me to derive this formula. I'm suspecting it has something to do with the glass/steel ratio and the displacement vectors. Need mathematical proof D:

You will never be able to prove it!

The formula you wrote was:

Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass

LHS has units of momentum; because it is momentum.

RHS has units of velocity; because the mass units cancel out.
 
  • #5




Firstly, I want to commend you for your efforts in trying to derive and understand this formula. It shows your dedication and determination as a scientist.

Now, to answer your question, the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass is used in cases where the two masses are not equal because it takes into account the difference in masses between the two objects. In an elastic collision, the total momentum before and after the collision must be equal. However, in the case where the masses are not equal, the velocities of the two objects after the collision will also be different. This is where the formula comes in.

By using the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass, we are able to calculate the velocity of the glass marble after the collision, taking into account the difference in masses between the glass and steel marbles. This is necessary in order to satisfy the conservation of momentum principle.

In order to derive this formula, you can use the momentum conservation equation, as you have already attempted. However, when substituting the velocities, you should use the formula for conservation of kinetic energy for elastic collisions, which is (1/2)m1v1i^2 + (1/2)m2v2i^2 = (1/2)m1v1f^2 + (1/2)m2v2f^2. From here, you can solve for v1f and substitute it into the momentum conservation equation. After some algebraic manipulation, you should arrive at the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the reasoning behind the formula and how to derive it. Keep up the good work and never stop questioning and seeking knowledge as a scientist.
 

FAQ: Proving the conservation of momentum when two masses are not equal

What is the law of conservation of momentum?

The law of conservation of momentum states that the total momentum in a closed system remains constant, meaning that the initial momentum of the system must equal the final momentum of the system.

How is momentum calculated?

Momentum is calculated by multiplying an object's mass by its velocity. The formula for momentum is p = mv, where p is momentum, m is mass, and v is velocity.

What happens to the momentum when two masses collide?

When two masses collide, the total momentum before the collision must equal the total momentum after the collision. This means that the momentum of one object will decrease, while the momentum of the other object will increase, in order to maintain the total momentum of the system.

How can the conservation of momentum be proven when two masses are not equal?

In order to prove the conservation of momentum when two masses are not equal, the total momentum of the system before the collision must be calculated and compared to the total momentum after the collision. If the two values are equal, then the conservation of momentum has been proven.

Why is it important to prove the conservation of momentum?

Proving the conservation of momentum is important because it is a fundamental principle in physics and helps us understand how objects interact with each other. It also allows us to make predictions about the outcomes of collisions and other interactions between objects.

Similar threads

Back
Top