Proving the Equivalence of Solving Equations and Finding Functions

  • Thread starter tickle_monste
  • Start date
In summary, there is a proof that for all equations E(A1, ... , An), solving for Ai is equivalent to finding the function f(A1..A(i-1),A(i+1)...An), such that when f is substituted in E in place of Ai, E reduces to an identity. This proof uses the implicit function theorem and does not require any additional axioms. However, it should be noted that there may be multiple independent solutions to the equation, which must be accounted for in the wording of the problem.
  • #1
tickle_monste
69
1
I've got a proof but I'll wait a couple days to post mine to give you guys a chance to take a crack at it.

Prove that:

For all equations E(A1, ... , An), solving for Ai is equivalent to finding the function
f(A1..A(i-1),A(i+1)...An), such that when f is substituted in E in place of Ai, E reduces to an identity (i.e. 0 = 0, 1 = 1, a^2 + b^2 = c^2, etc.)

Use whatever axioms you'd like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Seems like implicit function theorem proof.
 
  • #3
Not necessary.
 
  • #4
I don't think this is true. If you consider the equation [tex]x_1=x_1^2[/tex] and the function [tex]f(x_2)=0[/tex] reduces to the identity 0 = 0, but misses the solution [tex]x_1=1[/tex].
 
  • #5
My wording of the problem was poor, I forgot to account for multiple independent solutions. So, here it is, better worded:
Finding a solution of Q in the equation is equivalent to finding a function f, such that when f is substituted for Q in the equation, the equation will reduce to an identity.

Both of your solutions satisfy this property, no other number satisfies this property and no other number is a solution.
 

FAQ: Proving the Equivalence of Solving Equations and Finding Functions

Can you provide evidence to support your claim?

Yes, as a scientist, it is important to provide evidence and data to support any claims or theories. This can include experiments, observations, and research studies.

What methods did you use to prove your hypothesis?

The methods used to prove a hypothesis can vary depending on the specific question being investigated. Some common methods include experiments, surveys, and statistical analysis.

How do you ensure the validity of your results?

To ensure the validity of results, scientists often use rigorous methods and controls in their experiments. This can include using a large sample size, randomization, and blinding techniques.

What if your results do not support your initial claim?

It is important to consider all possible outcomes and be open to new information as a scientist. If results do not support the initial claim, it may be necessary to revise the hypothesis or conduct further research to better understand the findings.

Can your findings be replicated by other scientists?

Replication is a crucial aspect of scientific research. To ensure the reliability of results, it is important for other scientists to be able to replicate the study and obtain similar findings. This also allows for further validation of the initial claim.

Similar threads

Back
Top