Proving the Falsehood of the Homomorphism Property for Ω:Zp^n→Zp^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bachelier
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the homomorphism property of the function Ω defined as Ω(x) = x^p for the ring Zp^n. Participants explore whether this function preserves addition, applying the binomial theorem and noting that terms vanish due to the ring's characteristic p. A counterexample is presented using p = n = 2, demonstrating that Ω does not satisfy the homomorphism property, as Ω(1+1) does not equal Ω(1) + Ω(1). This leads to the conclusion that the proposed function is indeed not a homomorphism under addition for the specified conditions. The discussion highlights the importance of examining specific cases to validate mathematical properties.
Bachelier
Messages
375
Reaction score
0
Define ##\Omega: \mathbb{Z_{p^n}} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z_{p^n}}## where ##p## is prime

with ##\ \ \ \ \ \ \Omega(x) = x^{p}##


I am trying to prove this is a ##Hom## under addition.

any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Essentially just apply the binomial theorem. Since the ring has characteristic p all the undesired terms vanish.
 
The ring ##K## has order ##p^n## which makes it ##\cong \mathbb{Z_{p^n}}##
 
Last edited:
jgens said:
Essentially just apply the binomial theorem. Since the ring has characteristic p all the undesired terms vanish.

You did notice that the ring I am working with has ##p^n## elements. It is an extension field of ##\mathbb{Z_{p^n}}##.
 
Last edited:
Oh whoops you are right! Unless I am mistaken it turns out the result is actually false! Take p = n = 2 and consider the map Ω:Z4Z4 given by Ω(x) = x2. Then Ω(1+1) = Ω(2) = 22 = 0 but Ω(1)+Ω(1) = 12+12 = 2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jgens said:
Oh whoops you are right! Unless I am mistaken it turns out the result is actually false! Take p = n = 2 and consider the map Ω:Z4Z4 given by Ω(x) = x2. Then Ω(1+1) = Ω(2) = 22 = 0 but Ω(1)+Ω(1) = 12+12 = 2.

yes, even in the general case ##\Omega(1+1) = 2^p \neq 2 = \Omega(1) + \Omega(1) \ \forall n, p \geq 2##
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
853
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
878
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K