Proving the gravitational force of a solid sphere using integration

  • #1
Sam Jelly
15
1
Homework Statement
I am trying to calculate the gravitational force of mass m from a solid sphere with Radius R, mass M with uniform mass distribution. I am integrating the gravitaional force done by the thin circular plate. (I put mass m on top of every circular plate's center of mass). I know the solution to this is GmM/R^2, but my answer seems to be wrong. Is there any mistake? (mass m is on the surface of mass M)
Relevant Equations
dF = GmdM/r^2
D917654A-DC87-45BD-94A5-D8E816870D4B.png

This is my attempt at the solution. x from the equation dF = GmdM/x^2 represents the distance between the circular plate’s center of mass and mass m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It appears that you assume that the force between the plate and the mass ##m## is the same as if the mass ##dM## of the plate were in the center of the plate. Why would it be so?
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
  • #3
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
 
  • #4
Sam Jelly said:
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
This is wrong.

Essentially you are making an assumption about the overall gravity of an object where you cannot replace it by a point mass in the CoM, but you want to show it for a sphere - for which you can.
 
  • #5
Sam Jelly said:
I assumed that mass dM was in the center of each plate because the mass is distributed uniformly therefore it will be at the center of mass.
If that were assumed to be true in general, there would be no point in proving it for the special case of a sphere!
 
  • #6
As for a simple argument to see that it is not the case for a disc:

Consider the gravitational pull of a small part of the disc ##dm##. As long as the volume it is contained in is small, the gravitational pull at the point of interest can be approximated by the point source formula
$$
d\vec g = \frac{G\, dm}{x^2+r^2} \vec e,
$$
where ##\vec e## is a unit vector pointing from the point of interest towards the mass element. Now, by symmetry, the final gravitational field ##\vec g## must point towards the center of the disc, but there are two effects that both come into play for any ##r > 0##:
  1. The denominator ##x^2 + r^2 > x^2## so the first factor is always smaller than it would be if the mass ##dm## was on the symmetry axis.
  2. The component of the unit vector ##\vec e## will be smaller than 1
Both effects mean that the contribution of the mass ##dm## is smaller than it would be if you had put it at the center of mass. Since all mass elements (except for the one at ##r = 0##) give smaller contributions to the gravitational field than they would if they were at the center of mass, the result of approximating the full mass of the disc to be at the center of mass must overestimate the actual gravitational field.
 
  • Like
Likes Hill and PeroK

FAQ: Proving the gravitational force of a solid sphere using integration

1. What is the general approach to proving the gravitational force of a solid sphere using integration?

The general approach involves using Newton's law of universal gravitation and integrating the contributions of infinitesimal mass elements within the sphere. By considering the symmetry of the sphere, we can simplify the problem and integrate over the volume of the sphere to find the total gravitational force exerted by the sphere on a point mass outside it.

2. How do you set up the integral for the gravitational force of a solid sphere?

To set up the integral, we consider a small mass element within the sphere, typically expressed in spherical coordinates. We then express the gravitational force due to this mass element and integrate over the entire volume of the sphere. The integral takes the form of a triple integral over the radius, polar angle, and azimuthal angle, incorporating the density of the sphere and the distance between the mass element and the point mass.

3. What role does symmetry play in simplifying the integration process?

Symmetry plays a crucial role in simplifying the integration process. Due to the spherical symmetry of the problem, the gravitational force at a point outside the sphere can be shown to be equivalent to the force that would be exerted if the entire mass of the sphere were concentrated at its center. This allows us to reduce the complex three-dimensional integral into a simpler form, often using Gauss's law for gravity.

4. How do you handle the gravitational force calculation for a point inside the solid sphere?

For a point inside the solid sphere, the gravitational force is calculated by considering only the mass enclosed within the radius of the point. This involves integrating the mass distribution from the center of the sphere to the given radius. The result shows that the force inside the sphere varies linearly with the distance from the center, reflecting the fact that only the mass within the smaller sphere contributes to the gravitational force at that point.

5. Can you provide an example of the final expression for the gravitational force outside a solid sphere?

Yes, the final expression for the gravitational force outside a solid sphere of mass M and radius R, at a distance r from the center of the sphere (where r > R), is given by Newton's law of gravitation: \( F = \frac{G M m}{r^2} \), where G is the gravitational constant and m is the mass of the point object experiencing the force. This result shows that the sphere's gravitational influence behaves as if all its mass were concentrated at its center.

Back
Top