Proving the i,j Corner Relationship in a Divided Square

In summary, the problem states that a square is divided into n^2 smaller squares with corners (i, j). The goal is to prove that for every whole value of k, k= (i+1) + (n+1)*j for all possible choices of i and j. The values of i and j represent the corners of the smaller squares, and k is a specific value related to the position of a corner. By understanding the maximum values of i and the differences between k values for different pairs of i and j, the proof can be solved.
  • #1
monsmatglad
76
0

Homework Statement


A square is divided into smaller n^2 smaller squares with corners (i,j)
Show that for every whole value of k, k= (i+1) + (n+1)*j and this is specific for every choice of i and j.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



i see what i have to prove, but i don't know how to prove it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
monsmatglad said:

Homework Statement


A square is divided into smaller n^2 smaller squares with corners (i,j)
Show that for every whole value of k, k= (i+1) + (n+1)*j and this is specific for every choice of i and j.

This is not very clear to me. I understand that you are dividing a square into 1, 4, 9, ..., or n2 smaller squares, but what does "corners (i, j)" mean?

I also don't understand where k fits into things.

Have you given us the exact wording of this problem?
 
  • #3
i and j are the corers of the smaller squares. the corner farthest down to the left would have i=0 and j=0. The next corner, moving to the right would be i=1 j=0.

K is just a value that according to the problem is related to the position of a corner.
if, for example i=1 and j= 2, then k would be k= (1+1) + (n+1)*2 which is a specific value for that specific pair of i and j.

mons
 
  • #4
It's really like counting.
Try like this: if you only change i, what is the maximum value you can get? (what is the maximum value of i?)
Now, let i be 0 again and change j by one. What is the difference between k(i_max,j=0) and k(i=0,j=1) ? Does this help you?
 
  • #5
aha. thank you, that solves it!
 

FAQ: Proving the i,j Corner Relationship in a Divided Square

What is the i,j corner relationship in a divided square?

The i,j corner relationship in a divided square refers to the relationship between the horizontal (i) and vertical (j) coordinates of a corner point in a divided square. This relationship follows a specific pattern and can be used to prove the division of a square into smaller equal squares.

Why is proving the i,j corner relationship important?

Proving the i,j corner relationship is important because it provides a mathematical proof for the division of a square into smaller equal squares. This proof can be used in various fields such as geometry, engineering, and computer graphics.

How is the i,j corner relationship proven?

The i,j corner relationship can be proven using the method of mathematical induction. This involves showing that the relationship holds true for a base case (usually a small square), and then proving that if it holds true for a particular square, it also holds true for the next square. This process is repeated until the relationship is proven for all squares.

Can the i,j corner relationship be applied to other shapes?

While the i,j corner relationship is commonly used for squares, it can also be applied to other shapes such as rectangles, triangles, and hexagons. The key is to identify the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the corner points and use the same method of mathematical induction to prove the relationship.

What are the practical applications of the i,j corner relationship?

The i,j corner relationship has practical applications in various fields such as architecture, map-making, and computer graphics. It can be used to accurately divide a square or other shapes into smaller equal parts, which can be useful in creating precise diagrams, layouts, and designs. It can also be used in coding and programming to create algorithms for dividing shapes.

Similar threads

Back
Top