Proving the Inequality: 0<A<B Implies 1/B<1/A

  • MHB
  • Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary: Instead, you prove a contradictory statement. In summary, the given proof is incorrect as it does not follow logical reasoning and does not prove the intended statement.
  • #1
solakis1
422
0
Is the following proof ,proving ; \(\displaystyle \forall A\forall B[0<A<B\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{B}<\frac{1}{A}]\) correct??

PROOF:

Let, 0<a<b................1

Let \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b}\)

Let,\(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}\)

But for \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}\Longrightarrow\neg(\frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b})\)

Hence we have: \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b}\wedge\neg(\frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b})\). a contradiction

Thus \(\displaystyle \neg(\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b})\)..................2

For \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b}\Longrightarrow (ab)\frac{1}{a}<(ab)\frac{1}{b}\Longrightarrow b<a(\),since a,b are different from zero and 0<ab

And by using (1) b<a& a<b => b<b = b<b & ~(b<b) ,a contradiction

Thus \(\displaystyle \neg(\frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b})\)..................3

Therefor ,from (2) and (3) we have: \(\displaystyle \neg(\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b})\).and \(\displaystyle \neg(\frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b})\) =>\(\displaystyle \neg((\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b})\vee(\frac{1}{a}<\frac{1}{b}))\Longrightarrow\frac{1}{b}<\frac{1}{a}\),by using the trichotomy law
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Therefore, for all A,B\in \mathbb{R}[0<A<B\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{B}<\frac{1}{A}]No, this proof is not correct. It does not make logical sense and the chain of reasoning is very hard to follow. Additionally, you never actually prove that "for all A,B\in \mathbb{R}[0<A<B\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{B}<\frac{1}{A}]".
 

FAQ: Proving the Inequality: 0<A<B Implies 1/B<1/A

1. Is the proof based on reliable data?

The reliability of the data used in a proof is crucial in determining its validity. Scientists must ensure that the data is accurate and collected through proper methods in order for the proof to be considered correct.

2. How rigorous is the testing process for the proof?

The testing process for a proof is typically rigorous and involves multiple steps to ensure its validity. This may include peer review, replicating results, and statistical analysis.

3. Are there any potential biases in the proof?

Scientists must always be aware of potential biases in their research and proof. This could include personal biases, funding biases, or cultural biases. It is important to address and minimize these biases to ensure the accuracy of the proof.

4. Are there any limitations to the proof?

Like any scientific study, a proof may have limitations that could affect its validity. This could be due to sample size, experimental design, or other factors. It is important to acknowledge and address these limitations in order to accurately interpret the results.

5. How does this proof contribute to the existing body of knowledge?

One of the main goals of scientific research is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge. When evaluating a proof, it is important to consider how it adds to our understanding of a particular topic and if it aligns with previous research in the field.

Back
Top