Proving the Inequality of Infimums for Bounded Functions on [0,1]

In summary, the homework statement is that f and g are bounded functions and it appears that the triangle inequality may be used to prove that the infimum of the sum of two functions is greater than or equal to the sum of the infima of the two functions.
  • #1
namekyd
5
0
I Just started Analysis 1 this week and I've encountered some tricky problems in the Assignment

Homework Statement


Let f,g : [0,1] -> R be bounded functions.
Prove that inf{ f(x) + g(1-x) : x (element of) [0,1]} >= inf{f(x) : x (element of) [0,1]} + inf{g(x) : x (element of) [0,1]}


Homework Equations


Perhaps the triangle inequality?


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that g(1-x) is still the same function over the same domain as g(x) however it runs in the opposite direction of the original function, thus making f(x) + g(1-x) a different function that f(x) + g(x). I do not know however, how that function is different.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The g(1-x) is just a read herring, since

[itex]inf_{x\in [0,1]}{g(1-x)}=inf_{x\in [0,1]}{g(x)}[/itex]

Convince yourself of that.

Anyway. To prove that inequality of yours. Take an [itex]x\in [0,1][/itex] arbitrary. Can you prove that

[tex]f(x)+g(1-x)\geq inf_{x\in [0,1]}{f(x)}+inf_{x\in [0,1]}{g(x)}[/tex]
??
 
  • #3
I'm having a bit of trouble with it.

I know that I can use the triangle inequality to say that |f(x) + g(1-x)| <= |f(x)| + |g(1-x)|
I am unsure as to how to proceed from there, I have been thinking perhaps using the Completeness Property to say that |f(x)| + |g(1-x)| >= -[f(x) + g(1-x)] but that doesn't seem right.P.s. thank you for the quick reply
 
  • #4
namekyd said:
I'm having a bit of trouble with it.

I know that I can use the triangle inequality to say that |f(x) + g(1-x)| <= |f(x)| + |g(1-x)|
I am unsure as to how to proceed from there, I have been thinking perhaps using the Completeness Property to say that |f(x)| + |g(1-x)| >= -[f(x) + g(1-x)] but that doesn't seem right.


P.s. thank you for the quick reply

Why use the triangle inequality anyway?? I see no absolute value signs anywhere...
 
  • #5
Perhaps I am misunderstanding the way to solve the problem here.
In my mind I would
a) show that Inf{ f(x) + g(1-x) } >= inf{f(x)} + inf {g(1-x)}
b) show that g(1-x) = g(x) for the domain [0,1] and hence that Inf{ f(x) + g(1-x) } >= inf{f(x)} + inf {g(x)}

I don't know how to show (a). nothing in my textbook is leading me to the conclusion that the infimum of the sum of two functions is greater than or equal to the sum of the infima of the two functions
 
  • #6
namekyd said:
Perhaps I am misunderstanding the way to solve the problem here.
In my mind I would
a) show that Inf{ f(x) + g(1-x) } >= inf{f(x)} + inf {g(1-x)}
b) show that g(1-x) = g(x) for the domain [0,1] and hence that Inf{ f(x) + g(1-x) } >= inf{f(x)} + inf {g(x)}

I don't know how to show (a). nothing in my textbook is leading me to the conclusion that the infimum of the sum of two functions is greater than or equal to the sum of the infima of the two functions

Well, what is the definition of an inf? It's the greatest lower bound right??
Why not show that [itex]inf(g(x))+inf(f(x))[/itex] is a lower bound. Then you have immediately your inequality since [itex]inf(f(x)+g(1-x))[/itex] is the greatest lower bound.

(b) is false, by the way. It's not true in general that g(1-x)=g(x). It is true that

[itex]inf(g(x))=inf(g(1-x))[/itex]

though...
 
  • #7
sorry that's what i meant for b
 
  • #8
Can you prove that for t in [0,1] that

[tex]f(t)\geq inf_{x\in [0,1]}f(x)[/tex]

and

[tex]g(1-t)\geq inf_{x\in [0,1]}g(x)[/tex]

??
 
  • #9
ahhh got it, thank you so much
 

FAQ: Proving the Inequality of Infimums for Bounded Functions on [0,1]

What is Real Analysis Problem?

Real Analysis Problem is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of real numbers, sequences, limits, continuity, differentiation, integration, and series. It involves the rigorous analysis and proof of mathematical concepts and theorems.

What are the key concepts in Real Analysis Problem?

The key concepts in Real Analysis Problem include the properties of real numbers, limits, continuity, differentiation, integration, and series. These concepts are used to study and prove various theorems in real analysis.

How is Real Analysis Problem different from Calculus?

Real Analysis Problem and Calculus are closely related, but there are some key differences. While Calculus focuses on computation and applications, Real Analysis Problem focuses on the rigorous proof and analysis of mathematical concepts. Real Analysis Problem also deals with more advanced topics such as metric spaces and topology.

What are some common applications of Real Analysis Problem?

Real Analysis Problem has many applications in various fields such as physics, engineering, economics, and computer science. It is used to study and analyze mathematical models and systems, and to prove theorems that are essential in these fields.

What are some good resources for learning Real Analysis Problem?

There are many good textbooks on Real Analysis Problem, such as "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin and "Real Analysis" by Royden and Fitzpatrick. Online resources such as lecture notes and video lectures from universities are also helpful for learning Real Analysis Problem.

Back
Top