Proving the Irrationality of Square Roots of Non-Perfect Squares

  • Thread starter end3r7
  • Start date
Can you do that part?In summary, the conversation discusses ways to prove that the expression √n - 1 + √n + 1 is irrational for every positive integer n. One method involves showing that the quantity under the square root is not a perfect square, while another method involves proving that the square root of a product of primes is irrational. The conversation also discusses the concept of relatively prime numbers and factors.
  • #1
end3r7
171
0

Homework Statement


Prove that [tex]\sqrt{n - 1} + \sqrt{n + 1}[/tex] is irrational for every positive integer n.

Homework Equations


[tex]\sqrt{n - 1} + \sqrt{n + 1}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\exists p,q \in Z[/tex] s.t. [tex]\sqrt{n - 1} + \sqrt{n + 1} = \frac{p}{q}[/tex]

Then [tex]2n + \sqrt{n^2 -1} = \frac{p^2}{q^2}[/tex]

So "all" I have to do is to show that [tex]\sqrt{n^2 - 1}[/tex] is irrational.

What's the easiest way? I could show that the quantity under the square root is not a perfect square, but since we have not learned that the square root of a non-perfectsquare is irrational, I'd appreciate a proof of that also.

What I did was
[tex]\exists p,q \in Z[/tex] s.t. [tex]\sqrt{n^2 - 1} = \frac{p}{q}[/tex] and gcd(p,q) = 1.Then [tex]n^2 -1 = \frac{p^2}{q^2}[/tex] or [tex]n^2 = \frac{p^2 + q^2}{q^2}[/tex]

Any rational solution is of the form [tex]\frac{m}{n}[/tex], where m divides [tex]\frac{p^2 + q^2}{q^2}[/tex]. That means m divides both p^2 and q^2, therefore they cannot be relatively prime.

Is that valid?
Or is there a more elegant way?
Also can anybody provide me with the proof that only square roots of perfect squares are rationals?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Since [tex]y=\sqrt{x^2-1}[/tex] is the upper half of a hyperbola with foci on the x-axis, for positive values of x, it approaches the line [tex]y=x[/tex].

Also, since [tex]\sqrt{x^2-1}[/tex] is monotonically increasing for positive x, [tex]\forall x \in \mathbb{N}, 0<x-\sqrt{x^2-1}<1[/tex].

Therefore, [tex]\forall x \in \mathbb{N}, \sqrt{x^2-1} \notin \mathbb{Q}[/tex].

Q.E.D.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
That's a neat way to do it, but I was really wondering about the methods I proposed. I'd like to see if my reasoning is correct.
 
  • #4
Actually I think I might know how to prove that any square of a composite nonperfect is an irrational.

let's x = (p1^n1)(p2^n2)...(pN^nN), where pi's are prime numbers.
In order for x to not be a nonperfect square then at least one ni is odd.

for each p, if the corresponding n>=2, then we can factor that p out of the square root until we are just left with p^1 power inside the square root. Therefore the square root only has a product of primes inside it.

To show that the square root of a product of primes is irrational is trivial by a proof by contradiction.

I think I'll proceed with that.

But again, thanks for helping foxjwill, your really was very prompt. =)
 
  • #5
I don't think either one of them are particularly valid. If sqrt(n)=p/q with p and q relatively prime, then q^2*n=p^2. If r is any prime divisor of n, then r must divide p^2. If r divides p^2 then r divides p, so r^2 divides p^2. r^2 doesn't divide q^2 since p and q are relatively prime. If r^2 divides p^2 then it must divide ___. Fill in the blank. Can you take it from there?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Dick said:
I don't think either one of them are particularly valid. If sqrt(n)=p/q with p and q relatively prime, then q^2*n=p^2. If r is any prime divisor of n, then r must divide p^2. If r divides p^2 then r divides p, so r^2 divides p^2. r^2 doesn't divide q^2 since p and q are relatively prime. If r^2 divides p^2 then it must divide ___. Fill in the blank. Can you take it from there?

Doesn't my post just above yours take care of it?
 
  • #7
end3r7 said:
Doesn't my post just above yours take care of it?

Sure. Once you prove the square root of a prime is irrational and that the square root of two or more different primes is also irrational.
 

FAQ: Proving the Irrationality of Square Roots of Non-Perfect Squares

What are irrationals and why are they important?

Irrationals are numbers that cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. They are important because they represent numbers that cannot be precisely measured or calculated, and they play a crucial role in many mathematical and scientific concepts.

How do you solve problems involving irrationals?

Problems involving irrationals can be solved by using approximation methods, such as rounding or using decimal approximations. Additionally, many advanced mathematical techniques, such as the quadratic formula or the Pythagorean theorem, involve irrationals.

Can irrational numbers be negative?

Yes, irrational numbers can be negative. The sign of a number is determined by whether it is greater or less than zero, not by whether it can be expressed as a ratio of two integers.

Why do we use the symbol "π" to represent the irrational number pi?

The symbol "π" comes from the Greek letter pi, which is the first letter of the Greek word for perimeter. This symbol was chosen because pi is commonly used in mathematical formulas and represents the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter.

What are some real-world applications of irrational numbers?

Irrational numbers are used in many real-world applications, such as calculating the area of a circle, designing buildings with curved surfaces, and analyzing data in statistics. They are also crucial in fields such as physics, engineering, and economics.

Back
Top