Proving the Limit of Integral over f:[a,b] to R

In summary, we are considering a function f:[a,b] --> R, which is integrable and bounded. We are asked to show that the limit of the integral of f(x) from a_n to b, as n approaches infinity, is equal to the integral of f(x) from a to b. One approach is to use the second fundamental theorem of calculus to define an anti-derivative of f, called F(x). Then, using the first fundamental theorem of calculus, we can write the integral as F(b)-F(a_n). We then need to show that lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} F(a_n)=0, which can be done by showing that F(z) is continuous and using the fact that
  • #1
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,807
32
Consider f:[a,b] --> R, an integrable and bounded (ain't that implied by "integrable"?!) function and consider {a_n} a sequence that converges towards a and such that a < a_n < b (for all n). Show and rigorously justify that

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a_n}^{b} f(x)dx = \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx[/tex]

All we found is the, imo, not very rigorous and seemingly too easy,

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = \int_{a}^{a_n} f(x)dx + \int_{a_n}^{b} f(x)dx \Rightarrow \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a}^{a_n} f(x)dx + \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a_n}^{b} f(x)dx[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow \int_{a}^{b} f(x)dx = 0 + \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\int_{a_n}^{b} f(x)dx[/tex] qed

Does anyone with more insight see how to do this more rigorously or is this the way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
quasar987 said:
Consider f:[a,b] --> R, an integrable and bounded (ain't that implied by "integrable"?!)

Yes. If it's Riemann integrable, then it must be bounded. I don't know anything about Lebesgue integrals.

quasar987 said:
Does anyone with more insight see how to do this more rigorously or is this the way?

I'd say, use the second fundamental theorem of calculus to define an anti-derivative of f... call it F(x).

Then use the first fundamental theorem of calculus, to write your integral of f(x) from [tex]a_n[/tex] to b, as F(b)-F(an). Then the rest should be easy using the properties of limits.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I think you're assuming that there exists a primitive. "Integrable" does not imply "there exist a primitive to f(x) such that the integral is F(b) - F(a)". Maybe f is discontinuous.
 
  • #4
quasar987 said:
I think you're assuming that there exists a primitive. "Integrable" does not imply "there exist a primitive to f(x) such that the integral is F(b) - F(a)". Maybe f is discontinuous.

Yes, you're right. Forget about the first fundamental theorem of calculus.

Your proof is right... except you need to show that:

[tex]lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \int_{a}^{a_n} f(x)dx =0[/tex]

According to the second fundamental theorem of calculus, we can define:

[tex]F(z)=\int_{a}^{z} f(x)dx [/tex]

We don't need f(x) to be continuous to do this. So:

[tex]F(a_n)=\int_{a}^{a_n} f(x)dx [/tex]

We can put this in your limit and the limit becomes:

[tex]lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} F(a_n)[/tex]

But according to the second fundamental theorem of calculus F(z) is continuous. So:

[tex]lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} F(a_n)= F(lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_n)[/tex]

which equals:

[tex]F(a)[/tex]

and [tex]F(a)=\int_{a}^{a} f(x)dx =0[/tex]

So that should do it.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Very nice! Thank you for that.
 

FAQ: Proving the Limit of Integral over f:[a,b] to R

1.

What is the purpose of proving the limit of an integral over a function?

The purpose of proving the limit of an integral over a function is to determine the behavior of the function as it approaches a certain value or point. This can provide insight into the overall behavior of the function and its relationship to the integral.

2.

What does the notation "f:[a,b] to R" mean?

The notation "f:[a,b] to R" indicates that the function f is being evaluated over the interval [a,b] and the result is a real number, denoted by R. This notation is commonly used in calculus to denote the domain and range of a function.

3.

How is the limit of an integral over a function calculated?

The limit of an integral over a function is typically calculated using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which states that the integral of a function can be expressed as the difference between the antiderivative of the function evaluated at the upper and lower bounds.

4.

What are some techniques for proving the limit of an integral?

Some techniques for proving the limit of an integral include using the definition of a limit, using the squeeze theorem, or using properties of integrals such as linearity and additivity.

5.

Why is it important to prove the limit of an integral?

Proving the limit of an integral can provide important information about the behavior of a function, such as its continuity and differentiability. It can also help in solving real-world problems that involve finding the area under a curve or determining the rate of change of a quantity.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
713
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top