Proving the line lies on the plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter soulja101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Plane
Click For Summary
To determine if the line defined by (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1) lies in the plane given by (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 2) + s(1,1,-1) + t(2, -1, 1), the parametric equations for both the line and the plane were derived. The point (5, -4, 6) was identified as a specific point on the line by substituting u=0. The discussion emphasized that proving (5, -4, 6) minus (3, 0, 2) is a linear combination of the plane's direction vectors suffices to show the line lies in the plane. The conversation highlighted the simplicity of the approach, suggesting a more straightforward method to reach the conclusion. The key takeaway is that establishing the linear combination is essential for proving the line's presence in the plane.
soulja101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does the line with equation (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1) lie in the plane with equation (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 2) + s(1,1,-1) + t(2, -1, 1)? Justify your answer algebraically.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I started by getting the parametric equation of (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1)
x=5+u
y=-4+4u
z=6-u
I then subbed in u=0 to get a set of points
x=5
y=-4
z=6

I then got the parametric equation for (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 2) + s(1,1,-1) + t(2, -1, 1)
x=3+s+2t
y=0+s-t
z=2-s+t

I decided to use the points (5,-4,6)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi soulja101! :smile:
soulja101 said:
Does the line with equation (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1) lie in the plane with equation (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 2) + s(1,1,-1) + t(2, -1, 1)? Justify your answer algebraically.

I started by getting the parametric equation of (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1)
x=5+u
y=-4+4u
z=6-u
I then subbed in u=0 to get a set of points
x=5
y=-4
z=6

This is very long-winded :rolleyes:

you could just put u = 0 in (x, y, z) = (5, -4, 6) + u(1,4,-1), giving (5, -4, 6) immediately :wink:
I then got the parametric equation for (x, y, z) = (3, 0, 2) + s(1,1,-1) + t(2, -1, 1)
x=3+s+2t
y=0+s-t
z=2-s+t

why make it so complicated?

all you have to prove is that (5, -4, 6) minus (3, 0, 2) is a linear combination of (1,1,-1) and (2, -1, 1), and then the same for (1,4,-1) :smile:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
951
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K