Proving the Sum of Cosines Using Euler's Formula

In summary, the equation \frac{1}{2} + \cos \alpha + . . . \cos N \alpha = \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} can be proven using Euler's formula and the formula for the sum of a geometric series. By expressing the left-hand side as a real part of a complex sum, the equation can be simplified to the expected right-hand side. This is a more elegant method than a proof by induction.
  • #1
Tony11235
255
0
Prove that for any real number [tex] \alpha \neq 0, \pm 2 \pi, \pm 4 \pi [/tex]. . . one has
[tex] \frac{1}{2} + \cos \alpha + . . . \cos N \alpha = \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} [/tex]
I know it involves Euler's formula that relates sin and cos to the exponential function, and the formula for the sum of a geometric series. I'm not sure how to start this simple proof. Any help with be great.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
HINT: Use Euler's formula and think geometric series! :)
 
  • #3
All I've came up with is the expression

[tex] \frac{2\cos(N \alpha) - \cos(\alpha) -1}{2(1 - \cos(\alpha))} [/tex]

When I plug in pi for alpha in the expression above, I get the same expression when I plug pi in for alpha in

[tex] \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} [/tex]

It would be a little hard, or time consuming to simplify the first expression with trig identities to the second. Or maybe that's just what I think.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Sorry that this comes so late, but have you solved the problem yet ?

I tried the "direct" method with complex numbers and geometric series and it gets nowhere fast, as you observed. It's very much easier to just prove this one by induction.

Verify for N = 0 (trivial).

Do the inductive step and group the terms together under the common denominator [itex]2\sin{\frac{\alpha}{2}}[/itex], making the observation that you can only do this for nonzero values for the denominator (hence the constraint stated in the question). You will find that to simplify this, you need at one point to reexpress [itex]\sin{(N+\frac{1}{2})\alpha}[/itex] as [itex]\sin{(N+1 - \frac{1}{2})\alpha}[/itex] and expand that out to cancel some terms. In the end, you'll be able to reduce it very easily to the "expected" RHS.

Post again if you're able to solve it, or if you need further help.
 
  • #5
Tony11235 said:
All I've came up with is the expression

[tex] \frac{2\cos(N \alpha) - \cos(\alpha) -1}{2(1 - \cos(\alpha))} [/tex]

When I plug in pi for alpha in the expression above, I get the same expression when I plug pi in for alpha in

[tex] \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} [/tex]

It would be a little hard, or time consuming to simplify the first expression with trig identities to the second. Or maybe that's just what I think.
How did you get that? I am coming up with what you have times -1:

[tex]\frac{1}{2}+\cos{a}+\cdots +\cos{na}=\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}\cos{kx}\right)-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

then I solve and come up with something that's off by a multiple of -1. Why is this? Is my series above correct?

Because once I get to your series I can get it into the other form; I'd like to know how you got there. I'll post later, I didn't mean to go off topic here, sorry.
 
  • #6
apmcavoy said:
How did you get that? I am coming up with what you have times -1:
[tex]\frac{1}{2}+\cos{a}+\cdots +\cos{na}=\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}\cos{kx}\right)-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]
then I solve and come up with something that's off by a multiple of -1. Why is this? Is my series above correct?
Because once I get to your series I can get it into the other form; I'd like to know how you got there. I'll post later, I didn't mean to go off topic here, sorry.

I don't know what I was doing. It had to be totally wrong. The best way is the following...

[tex] \frac{1}{2} + \cos \alpha + . . . \cos N \alpha [/tex] so

[tex] \frac{1}{2} (e^{-\imath N \alpha} + e^{-\imath (N - 1) \alpha} + . . . . . + e^{-\imath \alpha} + 1 + e^{\imath \alpha} + . . . . . + e^{\imath N \alpha} ) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{e^{-\imath N \alpha} (1 - e^{\imath (2N + 1) \alpha}) }{1 - e^{\imath \alpha} } [/tex]

then

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{e^{-\imath (N + 1) \alpha} - e^{\imath (N + 1) \alpha} }{e^{\tfrac {-\alpha} {2}} - e^{\tfrac {\alpha} {2}}}} }[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{-2\imath \sin[(N + \tfrac 1 {2})\alpha] }{-2\imath \sin(\tfrac \alpha {2}) } [/tex]

and finally

[tex] \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Tony11235 said:
I don't know what I was doing. It had to be totally wrong. The best way is the following...

[tex] \frac{1}{2} + \cos \alpha + . . . \cos N \alpha [/tex] so

[tex] \frac{1}{2} (e^{-\imath N \alpha} + e^{-\imath (N - 1) \alpha} + . . . . . + e^{-\imath \alpha} + 1 + e^{\imath \alpha} + . . . . . + e^{\imath N \alpha} ) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{e^{-\imath N \alpha} (1 - e^{\imath (2N + 1) \alpha}) }{1 - e^{\imath \alpha} } [/tex]

then

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{e^{-\imath (N + 1) \alpha} - e^{\imath (N + 1) \alpha} }{e^{\tfrac {-\alpha} {2}} - e^{\tfrac {\alpha} {2}}}} }[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{-2\imath \sin[(N + \tfrac 1 {2})\alpha] }{-2\imath \sin(\tfrac \alpha {2}) } [/tex]

and finally

[tex] \frac{sin[(N+\tfrac 1 {2}) \alpha ]}{ 2 \sin (\tfrac \alpha {2})} [/tex]

Yes, this is a very elegant method (I think there's a typo in the LaTex somewhere there, but the proof is evident). I tried expressing the LHS as a real part of a complex sum. I think you must've done the same sort of thing initially, that's why we got nowhere.

Much more satisfying than a proof by induction, certainly.
 
  • #8
Cool, I had been wondering what the non-induction proof was too. :smile:
 

FAQ: Proving the Sum of Cosines Using Euler's Formula

What is Euler's formula?

Euler's formula is a mathematical equation that expresses the relationship between trigonometric functions and complex numbers. It is written as eix = cos(x) + i*sin(x), where e is the base of the natural logarithm, i is the imaginary unit, and x is the angle in radians.

How is Euler's formula used in proofs?

Euler's formula can be used to simplify complex expressions and solve problems involving trigonometric functions and complex numbers. It is often used in proofs to demonstrate the relationships between these mathematical concepts.

What are some common applications of Euler's formula?

Euler's formula has wide-ranging applications in fields such as physics, engineering, and computer science. It is used in signal processing, quantum mechanics, and even in the design of video game graphics.

Is Euler's formula always true?

Yes, Euler's formula is a fundamental truth in mathematics and has been proven to be true for all values of x, whether positive, negative, or complex.

Are there any limitations to using Euler's formula?

While Euler's formula is a powerful tool in mathematics, it may not always be the most efficient or practical method for solving certain problems. In some cases, alternative methods may be more suitable or easier to understand.

Back
Top