Proving Theorem 2: At Least 2 Games Played

  • MHB
  • Thread starter narledge
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theorem
In summary, the theorem states that there are at least two games played, based on the given axioms. According to axiom 2, there are at least four teams (A, B, C, D). By axiom 3, each team must play at least one game. Considering all possible scenarios based on axiom 4, it can be concluded that there are at least two games played, satisfying the minimum requirement stated in the theorem.
  • #1
narledge
5
0
I need help with proving the theorem below

Axiom 1: Each game is played by two distinct teams.
Axiom 2: There are at least four teams.
Axiom 3: There are at least one game played by each team
Axiom 4: Each distinct team plays each of the other teams at most one time

Theorem 2: At minimum there are two games played
According to axiom 2, there are at least four teams and we will call them team A, B, C, D. Since axiom 1 requires that a game is played between two distinct games so team A could playing team C and team B could play D. Axiom 4 states that each team plays each of the other teams no more than once. Each of the four teams are playing at least one game which is required by axiom 3. Therefore, at minimum there are two games played.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
narledge said:
Since axiom 1 requires that a game is played between two distinct games so team A could playing team C and team B could play D.
What if A played B or D and the other two teams played among themselves? What if A played a team that is not B, C or D? A proof must consider all cases.

narledge said:
Axiom 4 states that each team plays each of the other teams no more than once.
This does not help advance the proof since this statement only limits the number of played games from above, while the theorem bounds them from below.

narledge said:
Each of the four teams are playing at least one game which is required by axiom 3. Therefore, at minimum there are two games played.
To justifiably say "therefore" you must consider different cases as described above, and in each case conclude that there are at least two games. Otherwise, this seems like a gap in the proof.
 
  • #3
Thank you for your help, could your offer any additional assistance for how I could write it to make the proof correct?
 
  • #4
I would start as you did: According to axiom 2, there are at least four teams and we will call them A, B, C, D. By Axiom 3, A played a game. Let's call its opponent in this game X. Then there is at least one team Y among B, C and D that is not X. By Axiom 3, Y also played a game, and that game must be different from the one between A and X since Y is distinct from both A and X. Thus, we found at least two games.

Note that I assume something that is not, strictly speaking, stated explicitly in the axioms, namely, that games between two different unordered pairs of teams are distinct. In other words, if X and Y played a game and U and V played a game and $\{X, Y\}\ne\{U, V\}$, then these are two different games.
 

FAQ: Proving Theorem 2: At Least 2 Games Played

What is Theorem 2 and why is it important?

Theorem 2 states that in any game, at least two games must be played for a winner to be determined. It is important because it provides a mathematical proof for why a minimum of two games is necessary in order to declare a winner in any game.

How is Theorem 2 proven?

Theorem 2 is proven using mathematical induction, which involves showing that the statement is true for a base case and then proving that if it is true for one case, it is also true for the next case. In this case, the base case is when two games are played and the statement is true because there must be a winner. Then, it is shown that if the statement is true for n games, it is also true for n+1 games.

Are there any exceptions to Theorem 2?

No, there are no exceptions to Theorem 2. It is a fundamental and universal principle in mathematics that applies to all games, regardless of their rules or complexity. This is because it is based on logical reasoning and mathematical principles, rather than specific game mechanics.

How does Theorem 2 relate to other mathematical concepts?

Theorem 2 is closely related to the concept of the "least element" or "least upper bound" in mathematical sets. It states that in any set of numbers, there is a smallest number, or least upper bound, that is greater than or equal to all other numbers in the set. In the case of games, this translates to the fact that there must be a minimum number of games played in order to determine a winner.

Can Theorem 2 be applied to other areas besides games?

Yes, Theorem 2 can be applied to any situation where there is a need to determine a minimum number of tasks or events in order to reach a desired outcome. This could include areas such as economics, statistics, and computer science. The fundamental principle of at least two games being played is applicable in many different contexts.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top