Proving Turan's Theorem (Dual Version) and its Implications for $ex(n, K_{p+1})$

In summary, the "dual version" of Turan's Theorem states that for a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $|E(T'(n,q))|$ edges, $\alpha (G) \geq q$. If $\alpha (G) = q$, then $G \cong T'(n,q)$. This theorem implies Turan's Theorem, which states that if $|E(G)| > |E(T(n,p))|$, then $\omega (G) \geq p+1$, where $\omega (G)$ is the size of the largest clique in $G$.
  • #1
joypav
151
0
I have already proved that for a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $|E(T'(n,q))|$ edges, $\alpha (G) \geq q$. Additionally, if $\alpha (G) = q$ then it must be that $G \cong T'(n,q)$.

Apparently this is the "dual version" of Turan's Theorem. How does this theorem imply Turan's?

That $ex(n, K_{p+1}) = |E(T(n,p))|$

Where:

- $T'(n,q)$ : $q$ disjoint cliques with size as equal as possible
- $\alpha (G)$ : independence number of $G$
- $ex(n, K_{p+1})$ : max number of edges in an n-vertex graph with no $K_{p+1}$ subgraph
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For completeness, here is the proof I wrote.
I'm not sure it is correct! May be some mistakes in the details.

Known Theorem:
Define $T'(n,q)$ to be q disjoint cliques with sizes of vertex sets as equal as possible. Let G be a graph with n vertices and $|E(T'(n,q))|$ edges. Then,
$$\alpha (G) \geq q$$
and if $\alpha (G) = q$ then $G \cong T'(n,q)$.To prove Turan's theorem, it suffices to show that if $|E(G)|>|E(T(n,p))|$ then $\omega (G) \geq p+1$, (where $\omega (G)$ is the size of the largest clique in G).\\
Assume $|E(G)|>|E(T(n,p))|$ then $|E(\overline{G})| \leq |E(T'(n,p))|$. By the in class proof, $\alpha (\overline{G}) \geq p+1$.
Notice that $\omega(G) = \alpha(\overline{G})$. Then we have, $\omega(G) = \alpha(\overline{G}) \geq p+1$, completing the proof.
 

FAQ: Proving Turan's Theorem (Dual Version) and its Implications for $ex(n, K_{p+1})$

What is Turan's Theorem and its dual version?

Turan's Theorem is a fundamental result in graph theory that provides a lower bound on the number of edges in a graph without a certain subgraph. Its dual version is a similar result but provides an upper bound on the number of edges in a graph with a certain subgraph.

What is the implication of Turan's Theorem for $ex(n, K_{p+1})$?

Turan's Theorem has important implications for the problem of finding the maximum number of edges in a graph without a complete subgraph of a given size (denoted by $ex(n, K_{p+1})$). It provides a tight bound on this maximum number of edges, making it a powerful tool in graph theory.

How is Turan's Theorem proved?

Turan's Theorem is typically proved using the extremal graph theory approach, which involves constructing a graph with the desired properties and showing that it has the maximum number of edges possible. This often involves using the greedy algorithm or the probabilistic method.

What are the implications of Turan's Theorem for the study of graphs?

Turan's Theorem has many implications for the study of graphs, including providing a lower bound on the number of edges in a graph without a certain subgraph and a tight bound on the maximum number of edges in a graph without a complete subgraph. It also has applications in other areas of mathematics, such as number theory and combinatorics.

Can Turan's Theorem be extended to other types of graphs?

Yes, Turan's Theorem has been extended to other types of graphs, such as directed graphs and hypergraphs. These extensions have important implications for the study of these types of graphs and have led to further developments in graph theory.

Similar threads

Back
Top