Proving x^n - x is Divisible by n for Induction Method

In summary, the conversation discusses a proof involving natural numbers and their divisibility by n. The person is seeking help in proving whether the statement is true or not, and provides some work they have done so far. The other person suggests testing the statement with different values of n and using induction on n instead of x. They also provide a possible solution for the proof involving x^n - x.
  • #1
grizz45
5
0
im stuck on this proof can anyone help?

Is it true that for all natural numbers n, for each natural number x, x^n − x is
divisible by n? If so, prove it; if not, explain why not.


so far i have gotten:

make x=1, ((1)^n) -1 = 0, therefore x=1 is divisible by n

assume true for x=k, ie: (k^n) - k is divisible by n

make x=k+1; ((k+1)^n)-(k+1)...and that's it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Before attempting to prove it, you should first do some work to see if it's actually true. Test the statement with a number of values of n.

If you believe that it's true, you should be doing your induction on n, not x. Your base case is for n = 1. Can you show that x^1 - x is divisible by 1? If that's too obvious, see if if holds for n = 2. IOW, can you show that x^2 - x is divisible by 2?

x^2 - x = x(x - 1)
If x is even, you're done, since an even number times an odd number is even.
If x is odd, then x - 1 is even, and you're done.

Now, assume that x^n - x is divisible by n, which means that x^n - x = a*n for some integer a.
The final step is to show that x^(n + 1) - x is divisible by (n + 1), using the induction hypothesis that x^n - x is divisible by n.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


First of all, great job on starting the proof! You're on the right track. To finish the proof, you can use mathematical induction. This method involves three steps: base case, inductive hypothesis, and inductive step.

Base case: As you have already shown, when x=1, x^n - x is divisible by n.

Inductive hypothesis: Assume that for some natural number k, x^k - x is divisible by n.

Inductive step: We want to show that for x=k+1, x^(k+1) - x is also divisible by n. Let's expand this expression using the binomial theorem:

x^(k+1) = (k+1)^n = k^n + nk^(n-1) + ... + nC2*k^2 + nC1*k + nC0

Subtracting x = k from both sides, we get:

x^(k+1) - x = (k^n + nk^(n-1) + ... + nC2*k^2 + nC1*k + nC0) - k

= (k^n - k) + nk^(n-1) + ... + nC2*k^2 + nC1*k + nC0

Since we assumed that x^k - x is divisible by n, we can replace it with a multiple of n:

x^(k+1) - x = mn + nk^(n-1) + ... + nC2*k^2 + nC1*k + nC0

= n(m + k^(n-1) + ... + nC2*k + nC1) + nC0

Since n is a common factor in all terms, x^(k+1) - x is also divisible by n. This completes the inductive step.

Therefore, by the principle of mathematical induction, x^n - x is divisible by n for all natural numbers x.
 

FAQ: Proving x^n - x is Divisible by n for Induction Method

What is a proof by induction?

A proof by induction is a mathematical technique used to prove that a statement or property is true for all natural numbers. It involves breaking down the statement into smaller cases and using the principle of mathematical induction to show that it holds for each individual case.

How do you know when to use proof by induction?

Proof by induction is typically used to prove statements that involve natural numbers, such as equations, inequalities, and divisibility. It can also be used to prove the correctness of algorithms or theorems in computer science.

What is the process for a proof by induction?

The process for a proof by induction involves three steps: the base case, the inductive hypothesis, and the inductive step. The base case involves proving that the statement is true for the first natural number. The inductive hypothesis assumes that the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number, and the inductive step shows that it is also true for the next natural number. By repeating this process, it can be shown that the statement is true for all natural numbers.

Can you give an example of a proof by induction?

Sure, one common example of a proof by induction is proving the sum of the first n natural numbers is equal to n(n+1)/2. The base case is n=1, which is true since 1=1(1+1)/2. The inductive hypothesis is assuming the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number k, and the inductive step is showing that it is also true for k+1. By using the inductive hypothesis and algebraic manipulation, it can be shown that (k+1)(k+2)/2 = (k(k+1)/2) + (k+1) = (sum of first k natural numbers) + (k+1), which proves the statement for k+1. Therefore, the statement is true for all natural numbers.

Are there any common mistakes to avoid when using proof by induction?

One common mistake when using proof by induction is assuming the statement is true for all natural numbers without properly proving the base case. Another mistake is not properly using the inductive hypothesis in the inductive step. It is also important to make sure the statement is properly broken down into smaller cases and that the inductive step applies to all possible cases. Additionally, it is important to clearly and logically present the proof to avoid any confusion or errors.

Similar threads

Back
Top