Puck on a sphere, energy & Newton's 2nd

In summary: So you can easily use it to solve the exercise. But I think that the simplest way is the previous one.In summary, the problem asks to find the vertical height that a puck will descend before leaving the surface of a fixed sphere, given a tiny nudge and using conservation of energy and Newton's second law. The first part of the hint is solved, but the second part involves finding the normal force and considering the effect of the centrifugal force. However, it can be solved easier by taking the components of the forces perpendicular to the tangent of the sphere and using the concept of centripetal force. Another solution involves using a non-inertial reference frame and considering the centrifugal force.
  • #1
Habeebe
38
1

Homework Statement



Consider a small frictionless puck perched at the top of a fixed sphere of radius R. If the puck is given a tiny nudge so that it begins to slide down, through what vertical height will it descend before it leaves the surface of the sphere? [Hint: Use conservation of energy to find the puck's speed as a function of its height, then use Newton's second law to find the normal force of the sphere on the puck. At what value of this normal force does the puck leave the sphere?]

Homework Equations



F=[itex]\dot{p}[/itex]
ΔU+ΔT=0

The Attempt at a Solution



I use y=y(t) as the height of the puck at time=t.

I managed the first part of the hint, getting down to [itex]v=\sqrt{2g(R-y)}[/itex]

The next part is what's throwing me. Intuitively, I would think that the puck leaves the sphere when the normal force is zero. This would happen when the normal force vector is perpendicular to the weight vector, making it so that the puck falls of once it gets to the equator of the sphere. That would then be my answer, but if it were correct, I wouldn't have to find the velocity of the puck. It also stands to reason that the velocity of the puck at any given time affects whether it's about to fly off the surface.

Analytically, I tried: (N for normal and W for weight)
F=N+W=[itex]\dot{p}[/itex]
N=[itex]\dot{p}[/itex]-W , setting N=0 gives
[itex]\dot{p}[/itex]=W

I considered integrating both sides with respect to dt so I could sub in my velocity equation on the left, but the right hand side would give me a function of t, so I would get something like

p=Wt
mv=m[itex]\sqrt{2g(R-y)}=Wt[/itex]

If I solve that for y I don't have y explicitly, I have function y(t). Also, I didn't put arrows above all the vectors, but consider that W points down, Wt would also point down. This would mean that p also has to point down, which shouldn't happen even after the puck leaves the sphere, which is nonsense.

The only other thing I can think of is the "centrifugal force" lessening the magnitude of N, but since it's not a real force, I don't really know how to do math with it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Habeebe said:
[itex]\dot{p}[/itex]=W

I considered integrating both sides with respect to dt so I could sub in my velocity equation on the left, but the right hand side would give me a function of t, so I would get something like

p=Wt
I am not sure if you can integrate this equation, because you set [itex]\displaystyle{N=0}[/itex], so it's valid only for a specific moment.

But you can solve the exercise easier without integrating. Just take the Newton's 2nd law for the normal components of the forces. Imagine that every moment you take the tangent of the sphere at the point where the puck is and you take the components that are perpendicular to this line.

[itex]\displaystyle{\vec{N}}[/itex] is always perpendicular so you don't have to do something for it. But as you said [itex]\displaystyle{\vec{W}}[/itex] points down so you have to take only the perpendicular component. Take an angle [itex]\displaystyle{\theta }[/itex] and use it to analyze [itex]\displaystyle{\vec{W}}[/itex].

The resultant of these components is the centripetal force! You know how to find this force in terms of [itex]\displaystyle{v}[/itex] (known equation). So you get an equation and ofcourse set [itex]\displaystyle{N=0}[/itex]. Now you just have to do some geometry - trigonometry to find [itex]\displaystyle{\theta }[/itex] in terms of [itex]\displaystyle{y}[/itex] and the problem is solved.

There's also one solution with a little bit more mathematics, using polar coordinates, but I think that if you know the centripetal force the previous one is easier.

Habeebe said:
The only other thing I can think of is the "centrifugal force" lessening the magnitude of N, but since it's not a real force, I don't really know how to do math with it.
Centrifugal is a non-inertial force. So if you want to use it you have to take a non-inertial reference frame. Here you can take a reference frame in which the puck is not moving. Then Newton's first law says: [itex]\displaystyle{\Sigma \vec{F}=\vec{0}}[/itex]. This can be done only using an (imaginary) non-inertial force. The normal component of this is centrifugal force which turns out to have the same length and opposite direction of centripetal force.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

FAQ: Puck on a sphere, energy & Newton's 2nd

What is Puck on a sphere?

Puck on a sphere refers to a physical system in which a puck (a small, flat object) is placed on a spherical surface and can move freely along the surface.

What is energy in relation to Puck on a sphere?

In this system, energy refers to the ability of the puck to move and change its position on the sphere. It is dependent on factors such as the puck's mass, speed, and height on the sphere.

How does Newton's 2nd law apply to Puck on a sphere?

Newton's 2nd law states that the net force acting on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration. In the case of Puck on a sphere, this means that the puck's acceleration is dependent on the net force acting on it, which is influenced by factors such as the slope of the sphere and any external forces.

What is the relationship between energy and mass in Puck on a sphere?

The mass of the puck affects its energy in Puck on a sphere, as a heavier puck will require more energy to move and change its position on the sphere compared to a lighter puck.

How can energy be conserved in Puck on a sphere?

In order for energy to be conserved in this system, the total energy of the puck must remain constant. This can be achieved by minimizing external forces and maintaining a constant mass and height for the puck on the sphere.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top