MHB Pythagorean Theorem: Unexpected Finding

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores an unexpected pattern discovered while experimenting with the Pythagorean theorem using combinations of integers up to 10. The user noted that the square roots of the sums of squares exhibit an increasing sequence of differences: 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, which themselves increase by 2. This observation leads to a deeper inquiry into the relationships between successive equations and their differences. Participants in the discussion analyze the mathematical implications of these findings, particularly focusing on the nature of the differences between successive sums of squares. The conversation emphasizes the intriguing connections within the Pythagorean theorem and invites further exploration of these patterns.
Angel11
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello, today i was playing around with the pythagorean theorem and found out something that i can't really explaing or atleast explain it with probably a false answer. So i was putting every possible combination with the max digit of 10. For example 1^2+1^2=\sqrt{2}, 1^2+2^2=\sqrt{5}... 10^2+1^2=\sqrt{101},10^2+2^2=\sqrt{104}. And then i found out that the square roots of the resolts are increasing by 3,5,7,9,11 and then i found out that those number are increasing by 2. so something like "1^2+2^2=\sqrt{(1^2+1^2)}+\sqrt{3} and then 1^2+3^2=\sqrt{(1^2+2^2)}+\sqrt{5}" so any idea how it works? my guess is WAY off i thought about it more and it is awful so i would appreciate anyones response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If I understand correctly, you have observed for example:

$$1^2+0^2=1$$

$$1^2+1^2=2$$

$$1^2+2^2=5$$

$$1^2+3^2=10$$

And you've seen that the difference between successive equations are the sequence of odd natural numbers. Let's look at the difference between two successive equations in general:

$$1^2+n^2=n^2+1$$

$$1^2+(n+1)^2=n^2+2n+2$$

What do we get when we subtract the former from the latter?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top