Q: Why is it a reversible adiabatic process but not isentropic?

  • #1
tracker890 Source h
90
11
Homework Statement
Puzzled by why it's a reversible adiabatic process but not isentropic.
Relevant Equations
Wb,rev equation
Q1: Why can't set ##Q_{in,net}=0## and use equation (2) to obtain ##W_{act,in}=\left( \bigtriangleup U \right) _{cv}##?
Q2: If assume it's a reversible process, why can't equation (3) determine (△S)sys=0?
ref1.
ref2.
1695460453538.png

$$
W_{rev,in}=W_{act,in}-W_{surr}=W_{act,in}+P_0\left( V_2-V_1 \right) \cdots \text{(1)}
$$
$$
\ \ Q_{in,net}+W_{act,in}=\left( \bigtriangleup U \right) _{cv}\cdots \text{(2)}
$$
$$
\ \ T_0\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}=\sum{\left( \frac{T_0}{T_k} \right)}Q_k\cdots \text{(3)}
$$
$$
\ let\ \ Q_{in,net}=Q_k
$$
$$
\left( 2 \right) +\left( 3 \right) :\
$$
$$
\ \ W_{act,in}=\sum{\left( -1+\frac{T_0}{T_k} \right)}\cancel{Q_k}+\left( \bigtriangleup U \right) _{cv}-\ T_0\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}
$$
$$
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ =\left( U_2-U_1 \right) -T_0\left( S_2-S_1 \right) _{sys}\cdots \text{(4)}
$$
$$
Substitute\left( 4 \right) into\left( 1 \right)
$$
$$
W_{rev,in}=\left( U_2-U_1 \right) -T_0\left( S_2-S_1 \right) _{sys}+P_0\left( V_2-V_1 \right)
$$
$$
=m\left[ \left( u_2-u_1 \right) -T_0\left( s_2-s_1 \right) _{sys}+P_0\left( v_2-v_1 \right) \right]
$$
$$
=-m\left[ \left( u_1-u_2 \right) -T_0\left( s_1-s_2 \right) _{sys}+P_0\left( v_1-v_2 \right) \right] \cdots \text{(5)}
$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't understand your notation or what you did.

Here is my take on this: If the surroundings are at 100 kPa, and the saturated liquid water is at 120 kPa, that must mean that the weight of the piston must contribute 20 kPa. At 120 kPa, the specific volume of water from the steam tables is 1.047 liters/kg. So you have 0.8/1.047=0.764 kg of water in your system. The heat of vaporization at 120 kPa is 2247 kJ/kg. So it would take 1717 kJ to vaporize all the water. You are only adding 1400 kj, so that would vaporize 81.5% of the water, so, in the final state, you would have (0.764)(0.815)=0.623 kg water vapor and 0.141 kg saturated liquid water in the cylinder at 120 kPa and about 105 C.

I don't understand what they mean by "the minimum amount of work with which this process could be accomplished."
 
  • #3
Chestermiller said:
I don't understand your notation or what you did.

Here is my take on this: If the surroundings are at 100 kPa, and the saturated liquid water is at 120 kPa, that must mean that the weight of the piston must contribute 20 kPa. At 120 kPa, the specific volume of water from the steam tables is 1.047 liters/kg. So you have 0.8/1.047=0.764 kg of water in your system. The heat of vaporization at 120 kPa is 2247 kJ/kg. So it would take 1717 kJ to vaporize all the water. You are only adding 1400 kj, so that would vaporize 81.5% of the water, so, in the final state, you would have (0.764)(0.815)=0.623 kg water vapor and 0.141 kg saturated liquid water in the cylinder at 120 kPa and about 105 C.

I don't understand what they mean by "the minimum amount of work with which this process could be accomplished."
My question is quite simple, why is the entropy change not zero for this reversible adiabatic process?
##\left( s_1-s_2 \right) _{sys}\ne 0##
 
  • #4
tracker890 Source h said:
My question is quite simple, why is the entropy change not zero for this reversible adiabatic process?
##\left( s_1-s_2 \right) _{sys}\ne 0##
Oh, that's easy. If your system includes the heater plus the water, then entropy is generated in the heater (resistance). If your system includes the water only, then the water is not adiabatic, but the entropy change is equal to the heat from the heater divided by the constant water temperature. Basically, the entropy generated in the heater is transferred to the water.

So for the combination of water plus heater, the process is adiabatic but irreversible. For the water alone, it undergoes a non-adiabatic reversible change. For the heater alone, it generates entropy that is transferred to the water.
 
  • #5
Chestermiller said:
Oh, that's easy. If your system includes the heater plus the water, then entropy is generated in the heater (resistance). If your system includes the water only, then the water is not adiabatic, but the entropy change is equal to the heat from the heater divided by the constant water temperature. Basically, the entropy generated in the heater is transferred to the water.

So for the combination of water plus heater, the process is adiabatic but irreversible. For the water alone, it undergoes a non-adiabatic reversible change. For the heater alone, it generates entropy that is transferred to the water.
##Q_k=0##, but why is ##\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}## not equal to zero in equation (3)?
 
  • #6
tracker890 Source h said:
##Q_k=0##, but why is ##\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}## not equal to zero in equation (3)?
Are you aware that entropy can change not only by heat flow at the boundaries of a system, but also by entropy generation due to irreversibility? Eqn. 3 does not include entropy generation.

$$\Delta S_{heater}=-\frac{Q}{378}+\sigma=0$$where Q is the heat transferred from the heater to the water and ##\sigma## is the entropy generated within the heater as a results of irreversibility (ohmic resistance).
$$\Delta S_{water}=+\frac{Q}{378}$$
$$\Delta S_{system}=\Delta S_{heater}+\Delta S_{water}=\sigma=\frac{Q}{378}>0$$
 
  • #7
Chestermiller said:
Are you aware that entropy can change not only by heat flow at the boundaries of a system, but also by entropy generation due to irreversibility? Eqn. 3 does not include entropy generation.

$$\Delta S_{heater}=-\frac{Q}{378}+\sigma=0$$where Q is the heat transferred from the heater to the water and ##\sigma## is the entropy generated within the heater as a results of irreversibility (ohmic resistance).
$$\Delta S_{water}=+\frac{Q}{378}$$
$$\Delta S_{system}=\Delta S_{heater}+\Delta S_{water}=\sigma=\frac{Q}{378}>0$$
But isn't the question asking for reversible work? So, doesn't that mean we should assume ##S_{gen}=0##, and when ##S_{gen}=0,Q_k=0##, which implies that ##\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}## should also become 0?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
tracker890 Source h said:
But isn't the question asking for reversible work? So, doesn't that mean we should assume ##S_{gen}=0##, and when ##S_{gen}=0,Q_k=0##, which implies that ##\left( \bigtriangleup S \right) _{sys}## should also become 0?
I don't understand what the question is asking for. All I know is that the process as described in the problem statement is irreversible (for the overall system), as you yourself correctly ascertained by the fact that the entropy change is positive while no heat is transferred to or from the system.
 
  • #9
Chestermiller said:
I don't understand what the question is asking for. All I know is that the process as described in the problem statement is irreversible (for the overall system), as you yourself correctly ascertained by the fact that the entropy change is positive while no heat is transferred to or from the system.
Thank you for your patient and detailed explanation. I will try to understand it first.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #10
tracker890 Source h said:
Thank you for your patient and detailed explanation. I will try to understand it first.
There are two ways that the Exergy destruction can be determined for the system (water and heater) involved in this process.

Method 1:

1. Calculate the Exergy change of the system ##\Delta E##
2. Recognize that, since the system is insulated, the exergy transfer between system and surroundings due to heat flow is zero
3. Calculate the exergy transfer due to work: ##-[W-p_0(V_2-V_1)##
4. Subtract the exergy transfer due to work from the overall exergy change of the system. This gives minus the exergy destruction.

Method 2:

1. Determine the entropy change of the combined system (heater + water). This is equal to the entropy change of the water alone, since the entropy change of the heater is zero. The entropy change of the water is equal to the heat supplied by the heater divided by the system temperature (since the water experiences an internally reversible change).
$$\Delta S_{water}=\frac{1400}{378}=3.70\ kJ/K$$

2. Recognize that this is also equal to the entropy generated in the combined system, since the combined system is isolated: ##\sigma=\Delta S_{water}##

3. Calculate the exergy destruction form ##destruction=T_0\sigma##
 
  • Like
Likes tracker890 Source h

FAQ: Q: Why is it a reversible adiabatic process but not isentropic?

Q: Why is a reversible adiabatic process not necessarily isentropic?

A reversible adiabatic process is, by definition, one where no heat is exchanged with the surroundings, and the process is reversible. However, for it to be isentropic, the entropy of the system must remain constant. In a truly reversible adiabatic process, there is no entropy change because there are no irreversibilities or heat exchange, making it isentropic by nature. The confusion often arises from misunderstanding the definitions and conditions of the processes involved.

Q: What distinguishes a reversible adiabatic process from an isentropic process?

A reversible adiabatic process is one where no heat is transferred and the process can be reversed without any net change in the system and surroundings. An isentropic process is specifically one where the entropy of the system remains constant. In essence, while all reversible adiabatic processes are isentropic, not all isentropic processes are necessarily adiabatic. For example, an isentropic process could occur with heat transfer if the heat transfer is exactly balanced by work done in such a way that entropy remains constant.

Q: Can an adiabatic process be irreversible and still be isentropic?

No, an adiabatic process that is irreversible cannot be isentropic. Irreversibilities, such as friction or unrestrained expansion, generate entropy within the system, leading to an increase in entropy. Since an isentropic process requires that the entropy remain constant, any irreversible adiabatic process cannot be isentropic.

Q: What role does entropy play in distinguishing between reversible adiabatic and isentropic processes?

Entropy is a key factor in distinguishing between these processes. In a reversible adiabatic process, there is no entropy generation because the process is ideal and reversible. This lack of entropy change means that the process is also isentropic. However, if a process is adiabatic but irreversible, entropy will be generated within the system, and the process will not be isentropic. Thus, entropy generation is what differentiates a reversible adiabatic process from one that is merely adiabatic.

Q: How do practical considerations affect the relationship between reversible adiabatic and isentropic processes?

In practical scenarios, true reversible processes are idealizations and are rarely achieved. Most real-world adiabatic processes have some degree of irreversibility due to factors like friction, turbulence, and non-equilibrium states, leading to entropy generation. Therefore, while the theoretical relationship holds that reversible adiabatic processes are isentropic, practical considerations often mean that real adiabatic processes are not perfectly isentropic due to these inherent inefficiencies.

Back
Top