Q1 - Equation with fractional and logarithmic exponents

I don't know what it means to "pass" a test. It is not difficult. I myself don't know how to use it, but it does not seem difficult. I think it is faster to type up what you are trying to say in LaTeX.And yes, your last "translation" was correct. You can check yourself. If 3^2+log925 = 45, then 3^{2 + \log_9 25} = 45. To see that this is true, write 45 as 9\cdot 5. Then the left side becomes 3^2 \cdot 3^{\log_9 25} = 9 \cdot
  • #1
ExamFever
31
0

Homework Statement



4 1/(x+1) · 8 1/(x+2) = 9log3 2

Homework Equations



n/a - same as 1

The Attempt at a Solution



To get rid of the exponents and be able to solve for x, I first took the logarithm with base 4 of all terms:

log44 1/(x+1) · log48 1/(x+2) = log49 log3 2

This equals:

1/(x+1) · 1/(x+2) · log48 = log32 · log49

When adding the fractions the left side equals:

log48/((x+1)(x+2))

Here I already feel I am on the wrong track, but it is still possible to get rid of the fraction by multiplying by the LCM (x+1)(x+2):

log4 8 = (x+1)(x+2)log32 · log49

Now it is possible to get the x's on one side by dividing both sides by log32 · log49:

log48/(log32 · log49) = (x+1)(x+2)

The x's can be worked free as: x2+3x+2, thus:

log48/(log32 · log49) -2 = x2+3x

The right side can now be made to look like: x(x+3), however, this does not solve x!

Now I am at a loss here, I have the feeling the three exponents at the start should be freed much sooner and in a cleaner way then I tried above, but this is the closest I came to a solution for x. Some help would be appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can simplify the right side before you even take the log base 4 of both sides. Note that
[tex]b^{\log_b n} = n[/tex], so

[tex]\begin{aligned}
9^{\log_3 2} &= (3^2)^{\log_3 2} \\
&= 3^{2 \log_3 2} \\
&= 3^{\log_3 4} \\
&= 4
\end{aligned}[/tex]

Now take the log base 4 of both sides. When you did that originally, I noticed that on the left side you had this:
log44 1/(x+1) · log48 1/(x+2)

You should use a single log for the product, instead of a log for each factor, like this:
[tex]\log_4 \left( 4^{1/(x + 1)} \cdot 8^{1/(x + 2)} \right)[/tex]

Furthermore, [tex]\log_4 8[/tex] can be simplifed to a rational number:
[tex]\log_4 8 = \log_4 4^{3/2} = \frac{3}{2}[/tex]69
 
Last edited:
  • #3
ExamFever said:

Homework Statement



4 1/(x+1) · 8 1/(x+2) = 9log3 2
...
To get rid of the exponents and be able to solve for x, I first took the logarithm with base 4 of all terms:

log44 1/(x+1) · log48 1/(x+2) = log49 log3 2

Wrong. log(a*b)=log(a)+log(b).

ehild
 
  • #4
Can't you write 4=2^2, and 8=2^3 to obtain:
[tex]
2^{2/(1+x)}\cdot 2^{3/(x+2)}=3^{4\log 3}
[/tex]
Which when rearranged shows:
[tex]
2^{2/(1+x)+3/(x+2)}=3^{4\log 3}
[/tex]
From here it looks straight forward to solve.

Mat
 
  • #5
Thank you all for the quick responses.

I have one more quick question about taking the logarithm of a side of an equation.

Consider the equation

32x+1 - 28 * 3x + 9 = 0

Now, it is obvious that a logarithm with base 3 needs to be taken, what I am wondering about is whether I have distributed the signs appropriately in the following calculation:

log332x+1 - (log328 + log33x) + log39 = 0

implies

2x + 1 - log328 - x + 2 = 0

implies the solution

x = log328 - 3
 
  • #6
write u=3^{x}, then your equation reduces to:
[tex]
3u^{2}-28u+9=0
[/tex]
Solve this and then take logs to base 3.
 
  • #7
I don't seem to follow you completely.

If 3x = u

How is 32x+1 = 3u2 ??
 
  • #8
This use nothing but the laws of powers.
[tex]
(3^{x})^{2}=3^{2\cdot x}=3^{2x}
[/tex]
Then:
[tex]
3\cdot 3^{2x}=3^{2x+1}
[/tex]
 
  • #9
Ok got it...wow, I really should learn to take all rules into account, I find it hard to see those things straight away like you seem to be able to :S

Here is one last one:

lg(x2-5x+7) / lg(4-x) = 0

I assume with lg log10 is meant.

Because this is a fraction both the numerater and denominator may be multiplied by the same number, in this case:

log1010(x2-5x+7)/log1010(4-x)

Is this correct?
 
  • #10
You have an equation:
[tex]
\frac{\log(x^{2}-5x+7)}{\log (4-x)}=0
[/tex]
Multiply though by log (4-x), to obtain:
[tex]
\log (x^{2}-5x+7)=0
[/tex]
So this means that:
[tex]
x^{2}-5x+7=1\Rightarrow x^{2}-5x+6=0
[/tex]
 
  • #11
I am teaching this sortof stuff at the moment, so don't feel too bad.
 
  • #12
Allright, one more and I should have a clear understanding of everything they can throw at me (hopefully).

32+log925 + 251-log52 + 10-lg4

Now, From the previous problem, I have a feeling that before doing anything to all of the terms, first the terms have to be simplified individually.

For the last one I can see that:

10-lg4 = 10lg4-1 = 4-1 = 1/4

For

32+log925

I can see there is a 32 in there somewhere, but how to get it out of the 2+log925?

Is

32(1+.5log925) = 91+.5log925

A valid way of doing this? If so, how to continue from here?

For

251-log52 = 52(1-log52)

And if I continue

52-2log52 = 52-log54 = 2-4 ?

What to do with those numbers that are not part of the logarithm?
 
  • #13
Is replacing 2 with the logarithm with base 5 that equals 2 a solution?

5log525-log54 = 5log5(25/4) = 25/4?
 
  • #14
Sort of, I can't quite read your equations, can you make then a little clearer please.
 
  • #15
Hmm and for

32+log925 = 32(1+.5log925) = 91+log95

This would mean:

9log99+log95 = 9log9(9*5) = 45

Please tell me I'm right...
 
  • #16
ExamFever said:
For

32+log925

I can see there is a 32 in there somewhere, but how to get it out of the 2+log925?

Is

32(1+.5log925) = 91+.5log925

A valid way of doing this? If so, how to continue from here?

Note that
[tex]a^{m + n} = a^m \cdot a^n[/tex]
and
[tex]b\log a = \log a^b[/tex]

You'll need these rules to simplify further.

For

251-log52 = 52(1-log52)

And if I continue

52-2log52 = 52-log54 = 2-4 ?

What to do with those numbers that are not part of the logarithm?
This is not correct. Use this rule:
[tex]a^{m - n} = \frac{a^m}{a^n}[/tex]69
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Ok I hope this is clearer:

10^-lg 4 = 10^lg 4-1 = 4-1 = 1/4

3^2+log925 = 3^2(1+.5 log925) = 9^1+log95 = 9^log99+log95 = 9^log9(9*5) = 45
 
  • #18
And for the last:

25^1-log52 = 5^2(1-log52) = 5^2-2 log52 = 5^2-log54 = 5^log525-log54 = 5^log5(25/4) = 25/4
 
  • #19
Actually, not really. I'd learn LaTeX if I were you.
ExamFever said:
3^2+log925 = 3^2(1+.5 log925) = 9^1+log95 = 9^log99+log95 = 9^log9(9*5) = 45
Or,
[tex]3^{2 + \log_9 25} = 3^{2(1 + 0.5\log_9 25)} = 9^{1 + 0.5\log_9 25} = 9^1 \cdot 9^{0.5\log_9 25} = 9 \cdot 9^{\log_9 5} = 9 \cdot 5 = 45[/tex]


69
 
  • #20
Well, I'd rather spend time studying these problems at the moment, I have an exam to pass on friday...

Anyway, is it difficult? I mean if it's easy I might as well use it.

Anyhow, the last "translation" you did was what I wrote...is it correct?
 
  • #21
ExamFever said:
Well, I'd rather spend time studying these problems at the moment, I have an exam to pass on friday...
I cannot speak for everyone here, but my point was that some people are less likely to help you if they cannot read your problem/work.

Anyhow, the last "translation" you did was what I wrote...is it correct?
What I posted previously was not a "translation" of what you wrote, but an alternate way of arriving at the solution. You rewrote 1 as [tex]\log_9 9[/tex], while I used the product of powers property [tex]a^{m + n} = a^m \cdot a^n[/tex]. You get the same answer either way.69
 
  • #22
Okay, I understand that.

The "translation" part was more of a joke, you translated my bad writing into latex ;)

Thank you very much for the help, it is greatly appreciated!
 
  • #23
It's not so important for you to learn LaTeX for this type of expression. You can get superscripts and subscripts using, respectively, the sup and sub tags. It's more important that you write it correctly. For example, you wrote 25^1-log5 2. According to the standard rules of precedence, this is actually equal to 25-log5 2 = 25-0.431 = 24.569, not 25/4. What you meant was

25^(1-log5 2)

or

251-log5 2.
 
  • #24
I've made very good progress in solving logarithmic equations. I thought I had all of them covered until I ran into the following problem:

log2(x+1) + logx+12 = 5/2

I've tried several things here, but never managed to work out all logarithms.

Some equations up to where I got and feel I'm in a right place:

x+1=u

u2 + logu16 = 32

Worked away the first logarithm, got an integer number on the RHS, but still this annoying logarithm!

u2 + 4 = 2u5/2

All logarithms are gone, but in order to get that u5/2 down we'll have to introduce logarithms again...

I'm running in circles here. Help would be greatly appreciated!
 
  • #25
[tex]
\log_{a}b=\frac{1}{\log_{b}a}
[/tex]
 
  • #26
That is very good to know. So when working away logarithms, how will the fraction be treated?

log2(x+1) + (1 / log2(x+1)) = 5/2
x + 1 + (1 / (x+1)) = 4 sqrt(2

Is this correct?
 
  • #27
[tex]
u=\log_{2}(x+1)
[/tex]
Then:
[tex]
u+\frac{1}{u}=\frac{5}{2}
[/tex]
 

FAQ: Q1 - Equation with fractional and logarithmic exponents

How do I solve equations with fractional exponents?

To solve equations with fractional exponents, we can use the properties of exponents to rewrite the equation in a form where the exponents have a common denominator. Then, we can solve the equation by isolating the variable and using inverse operations.

What is a logarithmic exponent?

A logarithmic exponent is a type of exponent that uses logarithms to represent the power of a number. It is written as logbx, where b is the base and x is the number being raised to the power.

Can I use the change of base formula for logarithmic exponents?

Yes, the change of base formula can be used for logarithmic exponents. It states that logbx = logax / logab, where a is the base of the original logarithm and b is the desired base.

How do I simplify equations with both fractional and logarithmic exponents?

To simplify equations with both fractional and logarithmic exponents, we can first use the properties of exponents to combine the terms with the same base. Then, we can use the power rule for logarithms to rewrite the equation in terms of a single logarithmic expression.

Can equations with fractional and logarithmic exponents have multiple solutions?

Yes, equations with fractional and logarithmic exponents can have multiple solutions. This is because logarithmic functions are not one-to-one, meaning that different inputs can have the same output. It is important to check for extraneous solutions when solving these types of equations.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Back
Top