MHB Q_1, Median, and Q_3 of A,B,C,D & E

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Median
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the first quartile (Q1), median, and third quartile (Q3) for the data set A=18, B=19, C=23, D=31, and E=36. The values are confirmed as Q1=19, median=23, and Q3=31, leading to a calculated interquartile range of 12. However, Wolfram Alpha (W|A) provides an interquartile range of 11 due to its interpolation method, estimating Q1 as 19.25 and Q3 as 30.25. This discrepancy highlights the difference between standard quartile calculations and those that involve interpolation.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1129
$$A=18$$ (first data in list)
$$B=19 Q_1$$
$$C=23$$ (median of list)
$$D=31 Q_3$$
$$E=36$$ (last data of list)

altho the problem doesn't ask for it, but W|A says the interquartile range is $$11$$ but here
$$Q_3-Q_1$$ is $$31-19=12$$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: box plot

karush said:
View attachment 1129
$$A=18$$ (first data in list)
$$B=19 Q_1$$
$$C=23$$ (median of list)
$$D=31 Q_3$$
$$E=36$$ (last data of list)

altho the problem doesn't ask for it, but W|A says the interquartile range is $$11$$ but here
$$Q_3-Q_1$$ is $$31-19=12$$?

Hi karush!

Your answers are all correct using the regular and simple method to determine the quartiles.
The reason W|A gives something different is because W|A interpolates between the numbers.
The actual first quartile is between 19 and 20. W|A interpolates and makes it $$19\frac 14$$.
Similarly W|A interpolates the third quartile to be $$30\frac 14$$, resulting in an interquartile range of $$11$$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top