QFT Ground State Analysis: Understanding e^(-iHT) |0>

In summary, the conversation discusses the expression e^{-iHT} |0>, which represents the ground state of the interacting theory in Peskin & Schroeders Introduction to QFT. It is equated to a sum of terms involving the interacting theory's Hamiltonian and ground state. The conversation also addresses the issue of the different Hilbert spaces that |n> and |0> belong to, and how this is addressed in the treatment of the expression. The conversation concludes with a clarification on the usage of this expression in reaching formula 4.31 in the text.
  • #1
silverwhale
84
2
Hello Everybody,

In page 86, in Peskin & Schroeders Introduction to QFT, the following expression is introduced to analyze [tex] \left | \Omega \right >; [/tex] the ground state of the interacting theory:

[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right >. [/tex]

Where |0> is the ground state of the free theory and H is the Hamiltonian of the interacting theory. What is this expression? It is not the dirac picture free theory ground state, and it can't be just a time translation of the free theory ground state. Well maybe it is but I never saw this in my QM days.

Furthermore, the expression is equated to

[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right > = \Sigma_n e^{-iE_nT} \left | n \right > \left < n \right | 0 >. [/tex]

Don't |n> and |0> belong to different Hilbert spaces? Am I missing something here?

Thanks for any clarification!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is this expression? It is not the dirac picture free theory ground state, and it can't be just a time translation of the free theory ground state.
Sure, I think that's what it is, it's the evolution of the free ground state in the Schrodinger picture.
Don't |n> and |0> belong to different Hilbert spaces?
Not in this example. In fact they specifically assume that <Ω|0> is nonzero.

[By the way, some of Peskin & Schroder is available on Google Books, including p86!]
 
  • #3
silverwhale said:
Don't |n> and |0> belong to different Hilbert spaces?
In general, yes.

In this type of treatment, one makes such assumptions -- and is punished much later as various divergences emerge. That's why regularization+renormalization are needed later -- to try and correct for the fact that one is not using quite the right Hilbert space.

There's a similar sleight of hand in P&S later on p109 where they say "if the formula (4.88) could somehow be justified, we could use it to retrieve...". They attempt such justification later in ch7 with discussion about field strength renormalization, and several other things.
 
  • #4
Got it! Many thanks.

So basically we have the ground state of the free theory in the shrödinger picture being at t_0 = 0, and we apply the time translation operator containing the (full) Hamiltonian as it should be.

And the second fact would be just that, well, they should be in different Hilbert spaces but we ignore this fact for now and try to reach expression 4.31!

Thanks!
 

FAQ: QFT Ground State Analysis: Understanding e^(-iHT) |0>

What is QFT?

QFT stands for Quantum Field Theory, which is a theoretical framework used to study the behavior of particles and their interactions in the quantum realm.

What is a ground state in QFT?

In QFT, a ground state refers to the lowest energy state of a quantum system. It is the state in which a system is in its most stable and least excited state.

What is the significance of e^(-iHT) in QFT ground state analysis?

e^(-iHT) is known as the time evolution operator in QFT, where e is Euler's number, i is the imaginary unit, H is the Hamiltonian operator, and T is the time variable. It is used to calculate the evolution of a quantum state over time.

What does |0> represent in "e^(-iHT) |0>"?

|0> represents the vacuum state in QFT, which is the state with no particles present. It is often used as the starting point for studying the behavior of particles in a quantum system.

Why is understanding e^(-iHT) important in QFT ground state analysis?

Understanding e^(-iHT) is crucial in QFT ground state analysis because it allows us to predict how a quantum state will evolve over time and the probability of different energy states. This information is essential in understanding the behavior of particles and their interactions in the quantum realm.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
958
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top