- #1
silverwhale
- 84
- 2
Hello Everybody,
In page 86, in Peskin & Schroeders Introduction to QFT, the following expression is introduced to analyze [tex] \left | \Omega \right >; [/tex] the ground state of the interacting theory:
[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right >. [/tex]
Where |0> is the ground state of the free theory and H is the Hamiltonian of the interacting theory. What is this expression? It is not the dirac picture free theory ground state, and it can't be just a time translation of the free theory ground state. Well maybe it is but I never saw this in my QM days.
Furthermore, the expression is equated to
[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right > = \Sigma_n e^{-iE_nT} \left | n \right > \left < n \right | 0 >. [/tex]
Don't |n> and |0> belong to different Hilbert spaces? Am I missing something here?
Thanks for any clarification!
In page 86, in Peskin & Schroeders Introduction to QFT, the following expression is introduced to analyze [tex] \left | \Omega \right >; [/tex] the ground state of the interacting theory:
[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right >. [/tex]
Where |0> is the ground state of the free theory and H is the Hamiltonian of the interacting theory. What is this expression? It is not the dirac picture free theory ground state, and it can't be just a time translation of the free theory ground state. Well maybe it is but I never saw this in my QM days.
Furthermore, the expression is equated to
[tex] e^{-iHT} \left | 0 \right > = \Sigma_n e^{-iE_nT} \left | n \right > \left < n \right | 0 >. [/tex]
Don't |n> and |0> belong to different Hilbert spaces? Am I missing something here?
Thanks for any clarification!